Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FORM vs ACLS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FORM
FormFactor, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$11.62B
5Y Perf.+492.5%
ACLS
Axcelis Technologies, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.54B
5Y Perf.+536.9%

FORM vs ACLS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FORM logoFORM
ACLS logoACLS
IndustrySemiconductorsSemiconductors
Market Cap$11.62B$5.54B
Revenue (TTM)$840M$839M
Net Income (TTM)$68M$120M
Gross Margin42.1%44.9%
Operating Margin12.7%14.2%
Forward P/E68.5x46.9x
Total Debt$45M$42M
Cash & Equiv.$103M$145M

FORM vs ACLSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FORM
ACLS
StockMay 20May 26Return
FormFactor, Inc. (FORM)100592.5+492.5%
Axcelis Technologie… (ACLS)100636.9+536.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FORM vs ACLS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ACLS leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. FormFactor, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FORM
FormFactor, Inc.
The Growth Play

FORM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 2.8%, EPS growth -22.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.6%
  • 20.8% 10Y total return vs ACLS's 16.1%
  • 2.8% revenue growth vs ACLS's -17.6%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
ACLS
Axcelis Technologies, Inc.
The Income Pick

ACLS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.00
  • Lower volatility, beta 2.00, Low D/E 4.1%, current ratio 4.77x
  • Beta 2.00, current ratio 4.77x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFORM logoFORM2.8% revenue growth vs ACLS's -17.6%
ValueACLS logoACLSLower P/E (46.9x vs 68.5x)
Quality / MarginsACLS logoACLS14.3% margin vs FORM's 8.1%
Stability / SafetyACLS logoACLSBeta 2.00 vs FORM's 2.02, lower leverage
DividendsTieNeither stock pays a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)FORM logoFORM+407.6% vs ACLS's +212.7%
Efficiency (ROA)ACLS logoACLS8.8% ROA vs FORM's 5.6%, ROIC 9.6% vs 5.4%

FORM vs ACLS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FORMFormFactor, Inc.
FY 2025
Foundry & Logic Product Group
47.1%$370M
DRAM Product Group
31.5%$247M
Systems Product Group
18.7%$147M
Flash Product Group
2.6%$21M
ACLSAxcelis Technologies, Inc.
FY 2024
Systems
76.9%$783M
Aftermarket
23.1%$235M

FORM vs ACLS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLACLSLAGGINGFORM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ACLS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

FORM and ACLS operate at a comparable scale, with $840M and $839M in trailing revenue. ACLS is the more profitable business, keeping 14.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FORM's 8.1%. On growth, FORM holds the edge at +32.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFORM logoFORMFormFactor, Inc.ACLS logoACLSAxcelis Technolog…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$840M$839M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$152M$137M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$68M$120M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$5M$107M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+42.1%+44.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+12.7%+14.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+8.1%+14.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-0.6%+12.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+32.0%-5.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.2%-28.6%
ACLS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ACLS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 45.0x trailing earnings, ACLS trades at a 79% valuation discount to FORM's 216.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ACLS's 39.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FORM's 104.1x.

MetricFORM logoFORMFormFactor, Inc.ACLS logoACLSAxcelis Technolog…
Market CapShares × price$11.6B$5.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$11.6B$5.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS216.12x45.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.68.52x46.87x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.13x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple104.06x39.71x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue14.81x6.60x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share11.28x5.23x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF990.17x51.77x
ACLS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ACLS leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

ACLS delivers a 11.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $7 for FORM. ACLS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FORM's 0.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACLS scores 5/9 vs FORM's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricFORM logoFORMFormFactor, Inc.ACLS logoACLSAxcelis Technolog…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.7%+11.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+5.6%+8.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.4%+9.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.1%+10.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–945
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.04x0.04x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$58M-$103M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$103M$145M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$45M$42M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense252.69x33.79x
ACLS leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FORM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ACLS five years ago would be worth $42,463 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $38,975 for FORM. Over the past 12 months, FORM leads with a +407.6% total return vs ACLS's +212.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FORM at 74.7% vs ACLS's 12.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFORM logoFORMFormFactor, Inc.ACLS logoACLSAxcelis Technolog…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+151.9%+98.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+407.6%+212.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+433.1%+42.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+289.8%+324.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+2083.3%+1610.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+74.7%+12.5%
FORM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

ACLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

ACLS is the less volatile stock with a 2.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FORM's 2.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACLS currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs FORM's 93.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFORM logoFORMFormFactor, Inc.ACLS logoACLSAxcelis Technolog…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.02x2.00x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$159.09$171.60
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$26.08$52.55
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+93.7%+99.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10064.171.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.6M717K
ACLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates FORM as "Hold" and ACLS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -17.3% upside for FORM (target: $123) vs -25.1% for ACLS (target: $128).

MetricFORM logoFORMFormFactor, Inc.ACLS logoACLSAxcelis Technolog…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$123.38$128.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1912
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.2%+2.2%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ACLS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). FORM leads in 1 (Total Returns).

Best OverallAxcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FORM vs ACLS: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FORM or ACLS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, FormFactor, Inc.

(FORM) is the stronger pick with 2. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 6% for Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS). Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS) offers the better valuation at 45. 0x trailing P/E (46. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FORM or ACLS?

On trailing P/E, Axcelis Technologies, Inc.

(ACLS) is the cheapest at 45. 0x versus FormFactor, Inc. at 216. 1x. On forward P/E, Axcelis Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 46. 9x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FORM or ACLS?

Over the past 5 years, Axcelis Technologies, Inc.

(ACLS) delivered a total return of +324. 6%, compared to +289. 8% for FormFactor, Inc. (FORM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FORM returned +20. 8% versus ACLS's +1610%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FORM or ACLS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Axcelis Technologies, Inc.

(ACLS) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 00β versus FormFactor, Inc. 's 2. 02β — meaning FORM is approximately 1% more volatile than ACLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 4% for FormFactor, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FORM or ACLS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), FormFactor, Inc.

(FORM) is pulling ahead at 2. 8% versus -17. 6% for Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FormFactor, Inc. grew EPS -22. 5% year-over-year, compared to -38. 2% for Axcelis Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FORM leads at 1. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FORM or ACLS?

Axcelis Technologies, Inc.

(ACLS) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 3% net margin versus 6. 9% for FormFactor, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACLS leads at 14. 2% versus 8. 2% for FORM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACLS leads at 44. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FORM or ACLS more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Axcelis Technologies, Inc.

(ACLS) trades at 46. 9x forward P/E versus 68. 5x for FormFactor, Inc. — 21. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FORM: -17. 3% to $123. 38.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FORM or ACLS?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is FORM or ACLS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Axcelis Technologies, Inc.

(ACLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1610% 10Y return). FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACLS: +1610%, FORM: +20. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FORM and ACLS?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

FORM

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 15%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACLS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FORM and ACLS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FORM: 32.0% · ACLS: -5.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(FORM: 8.1% · ACLS: 14.3%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(FORM: 216.1x · ACLS: 45.0x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.