FOXF vs MFIN

For growth investors, Medallion Financial Corp.

(MFIN) is the stronger pick with 21. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 3% for Fox Factory Holding Corp. (FOXF). Medallion Financial Corp. (MFIN) offers the better valuation at 5. 3x trailing P/E (7. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fox Factory Holding Corp. (FOXF) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Medallion Financial Corp.

is actually cheaper at 7. 8x.

Over the past 5 years, Medallion Financial Corp.

(MFIN) delivered a total return of +22. 3%, compared to -87. 9% for Fox Factory Holding Corp. (FOXF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MFIN returned +54. 5% versus FOXF's +4. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Medallion Financial Corp.

(MFIN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 15β versus Fox Factory Holding Corp. 's 1. 55β — meaning FOXF is approximately 35% more volatile than MFIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fox Factory Holding Corp. (FOXF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 62% for Medallion Financial Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Medallion Financial Corp.

(MFIN) is pulling ahead at 21. 1% versus 5. 3% for Fox Factory Holding Corp. (FOXF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Medallion Financial Corp. grew EPS 17. 1% year-over-year, compared to -82. 5% for Fox Factory Holding Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Medallion Financial Corp.

(MFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 2% net margin versus -37. 1% for Fox Factory Holding Corp. — meaning it keeps 12. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MFIN leads at 50. 5% versus -35. 6% for FOXF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MFIN leads at 96. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Medallion Financial Corp.

(MFIN) trades at 7. 8x forward P/E versus 18. 0x for Fox Factory Holding Corp. — 10. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

In this comparison, MFIN (4.

8% yield) pays a dividend. FOXF does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Medallion Financial Corp.

(MFIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 15), 4. 8% yield). Fox Factory Holding Corp. (FOXF) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MFIN: +54. 5%, FOXF: +4. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (FOXF (Consumer Cyclical) and MFIN (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FOXF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock. MFIN pays a dividend while FOXF does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.