FOXF vs PATK

For growth investors, Patrick Industries, Inc.

(PATK) is the stronger pick with 6. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 3% for Fox Factory Holding Corp. (FOXF). Patrick Industries, Inc. (PATK) offers the better valuation at 24. 6x trailing P/E (18. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fox Factory Holding Corp. (FOXF) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Fox Factory Holding Corp.

is actually cheaper at 18. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Patrick Industries, Inc.

(PATK) delivered a total return of +59. 6%, compared to -87. 9% for Fox Factory Holding Corp. (FOXF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PATK returned +407. 9% versus FOXF's +4. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Patrick Industries, Inc.

(PATK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 93β versus Fox Factory Holding Corp. 's 1. 55β — meaning FOXF is approximately 66% more volatile than PATK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fox Factory Holding Corp. (FOXF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 139% for Patrick Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Patrick Industries, Inc.

(PATK) is pulling ahead at 6. 3% versus 5. 3% for Fox Factory Holding Corp. (FOXF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Patrick Industries, Inc. grew EPS -5. 1% year-over-year, compared to -82. 5% for Fox Factory Holding Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FOXF leads at -2. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Patrick Industries, Inc.

(PATK) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 4% net margin versus -37. 1% for Fox Factory Holding Corp. — meaning it keeps 3. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PATK leads at 7. 0% versus -35. 6% for FOXF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FOXF leads at 30. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Fox Factory Holding Corp.

(FOXF) trades at 18. 0x forward P/E versus 18. 3x for Patrick Industries, Inc. — 0. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PATK: 31. 9% to $126. 50.

In this comparison, PATK (1.

7% yield) pays a dividend. FOXF does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Patrick Industries, Inc.

(PATK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 93), 1. 7% yield, +407. 9% 10Y return). Fox Factory Holding Corp. (FOXF) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PATK: +407. 9%, FOXF: +4. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

PATK pays a dividend while FOXF does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.