REIT - Specialty
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FPI vs AMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Specialty
FPI vs AMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Specialty | REIT - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $466M | $83.94B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $54M | $10.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $30M | $2.88B |
| Gross Margin | 78.7% | 73.4% |
| Operating Margin | 45.6% | 44.2% |
| Forward P/E | 50.1x | 27.5x |
| Total Debt | $161M | $44.96B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $1.47B |
FPI vs AMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Farmland Partners I… (FPI) | 100 | 154.8 | +54.8% |
| American Tower Corp… (AMT) | 100 | 69.8 | -30.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FPI vs AMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FPI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.56, yield 11.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.56, Low D/E 30.0%, current ratio 537.08x
- Beta 0.56, yield 11.6%, current ratio 537.08x
AMT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 5.1%, EPS growth 11.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.3%
- 114.4% 10Y total return vs FPI's 33.2%
- 5.1% FFO/revenue growth vs FPI's -10.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.1% FFO/revenue growth vs FPI's -10.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (27.5x vs 50.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 56.0% margin vs AMT's 26.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (30.0% vs 434.2%) | |
| Dividends | 11.6% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs AMT's 3.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +9.2% vs AMT's -16.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.5% ROA vs FPI's 4.1%, ROIC 6.9% vs 2.4% |
FPI vs AMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FPI vs AMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FPI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.8B annually — 201.0x FPI's $54M. FPI is the more profitable business, keeping 56.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMT's 26.6%. On growth, AMT holds the edge at +6.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $54M | $10.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $28M | $6.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $30M | $2.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $19M | $3.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.7% | +73.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +45.6% | +44.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +56.0% | +26.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +35.9% | +34.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.5% | +6.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -64.2% | +76.9% |
Valuation Metrics
AMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.2x trailing earnings, FPI trades at a 48% valuation discount to AMT's 33.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMT's 18.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FPI's 22.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $466M | $83.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $618M | $127.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.23x | 33.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 50.07x | 27.49x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.70x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.93x | 7.88x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.02x | 8.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.74x | 22.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMT delivers a 27.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $6 for FPI. FPI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMT's 4.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMT scores 7/9 vs FPI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.7% | +27.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.1% | +4.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.4% | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.0% | +8.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.30x | 4.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $152M | $43.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $161M | $45.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.34x | 3.99x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FPI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FPI five years ago would be worth $9,699 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,668 for AMT. Over the past 12 months, FPI leads with a +9.2% total return vs AMT's -16.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FPI at 6.2% vs AMT's 1.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.0% | +4.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +9.2% | -16.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.9% | +3.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.0% | -13.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.2% | +114.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.2% | +1.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FPI and AMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMT is the less volatile stock with a -0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FPI's 0.56 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FPI currently trades 80.7% from its 52-week high vs AMT's 76.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.56x | -0.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.23 | $234.33 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.37 | $165.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.7% | +76.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 29.2 | 49.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 408K | 2.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FPI and AMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FPI as "Hold" and AMT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 59.2% upside for FPI (target: $17) vs 20.1% for AMT (target: $216). For income investors, FPI offers the higher dividend yield at 11.64% vs AMT's 3.74%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.00 | $216.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 49 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +11.6% | +3.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.24 | $6.73 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.2% | +0.4% |
FPI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). AMT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
FPI vs AMT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FPI or AMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the stronger pick with 5.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 4% for Farmland Partners Inc. (FPI). Farmland Partners Inc. (FPI) offers the better valuation at 17. 2x trailing P/E (50. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate American Tower Corporation (AMT) a "Buy" — based on 49 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FPI or AMT?
On trailing P/E, Farmland Partners Inc.
(FPI) is the cheapest at 17. 2x versus American Tower Corporation at 33. 4x. On forward P/E, American Tower Corporation is actually cheaper at 27. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FPI or AMT?
Over the past 5 years, Farmland Partners Inc.
(FPI) delivered a total return of -3. 0%, compared to -13. 3% for American Tower Corporation (AMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMT returned +114. 4% versus FPI's +33. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FPI or AMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
04β versus Farmland Partners Inc. 's 0. 56β — meaning FPI is approximately -1590% more volatile than AMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Farmland Partners Inc. (FPI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 4% for American Tower Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FPI or AMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), American Tower Corporation (AMT) is pulling ahead at 5.
1% versus -10. 4% for Farmland Partners Inc. (FPI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: American Tower Corporation grew EPS 11. 8% year-over-year, compared to -41. 5% for Farmland Partners Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMT leads at 3. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FPI or AMT?
Farmland Partners Inc.
(FPI) is the more profitable company, earning 60. 5% net margin versus 23. 8% for American Tower Corporation — meaning it keeps 60. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMT leads at 45. 8% versus 44. 2% for FPI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMT leads at 73. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FPI or AMT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, American Tower Corporation (AMT) trades at 27.
5x forward P/E versus 50. 1x for Farmland Partners Inc. — 22. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FPI: 59. 2% to $17. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FPI or AMT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Farmland Partners Inc. (FPI) offers the highest yield at 11. 6%, versus 3. 7% for American Tower Corporation (AMT).
09Is FPI or AMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
04), 3. 7% yield, +114. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMT: +114. 4%, FPI: +33. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FPI and AMT?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FPI is a small-cap deep-value stock; AMT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.