Financial - Capital Markets
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FRHC vs MKTX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
FRHC vs MKTX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $8.51B | $5.43B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.03B | $849M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $310M |
| Gross Margin | 52.6% | 69.9% |
| Operating Margin | 31.1% | 41.2% |
| Forward P/E | 99.3x | 18.0x |
| Total Debt | $1.95B | $285M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $837M | $520M |
FRHC vs MKTX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Freedom Holding Cor… (FRHC) | 100 | 804.0 | +704.0% |
| MarketAxess Holding… (MKTX) | 100 | 29.0 | -71.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FRHC vs MKTX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FRHC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 22.7%, EPS growth -77.9%
- 70.7% 10Y total return vs MKTX's 38.3%
- 22.7% NII/revenue growth vs MKTX's 3.8%
MKTX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta -0.28, yield 2.0%
- Lower volatility, beta -0.28, Low D/E 24.6%, current ratio 1.84x
- Beta -0.28, yield 2.0%, current ratio 1.84x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.7% NII/revenue growth vs MKTX's 3.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.0x vs 99.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs MKTX's 0.3% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (24.6% vs 160.9%) | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -8.0% vs MKTX's -31.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs MKTX's 0.3% |
FRHC vs MKTX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FRHC vs MKTX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MKTX leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FRHC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.0B annually — 2.4x MKTX's $849M. MKTX is the more profitable business, keeping 29.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FRHC's 4.2%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.0B | $849M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $470M | $443M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | $310M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.0B | $236M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.6% | +69.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +31.1% | +41.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +29.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +78.0% | +44.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.1% | +4.5% |
Valuation Metrics
MKTX leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.9x trailing earnings, MKTX trades at a 77% valuation discount to FRHC's 99.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MKTX's 12.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FRHC's 14.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.5B | $5.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.6B | $5.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 99.31x | 22.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 18.03x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.73x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.83x | 11.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.18x | 6.39x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.93x | 4.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.36x | 14.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MKTX leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MKTX delivers a 24.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $0 for FRHC. MKTX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FRHC's 1.61x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.2% | +24.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.0% | +15.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.8% | +18.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +25.4% | +25.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.61x | 0.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | -$235M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $837M | $520M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.0B | $285M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.94x | 168.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FRHC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FRHC five years ago would be worth $29,196 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,822 for MKTX. Over the past 12 months, FRHC leads with a -8.0% total return vs MKTX's -31.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FRHC at 20.5% vs MKTX's -18.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.9% | -14.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -8.0% | -31.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +75.1% | -46.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +192.0% | -61.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7066.5% | +38.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.5% | -18.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FRHC and MKTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MKTX is the less volatile stock with a -0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FRHC's 0.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FRHC currently trades 71.7% from its 52-week high vs MKTX's 65.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | -0.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $194.01 | $232.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $107.97 | $146.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.7% | +65.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.4 | 26.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 96K | 456K |
Analyst Outlook
MKTX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Consensus price targets imply 28.1% upside for MKTX (target: $196) vs -0.7% for FRHC (target: $138). MKTX is the only dividend payer here at 2.05% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $138.00 | $195.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.13 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +7.7% |
MKTX leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). FRHC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
FRHC vs MKTX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FRHC or MKTX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Freedom Holding Corp.
(FRHC) is the stronger pick with 22. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 8% for MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (MKTX). MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (MKTX) offers the better valuation at 22. 9x trailing P/E (18. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (MKTX) a "Hold" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FRHC or MKTX?
On trailing P/E, MarketAxess Holdings Inc.
(MKTX) is the cheapest at 22. 9x versus Freedom Holding Corp. at 99. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FRHC or MKTX?
Over the past 5 years, Freedom Holding Corp.
(FRHC) delivered a total return of +192. 0%, compared to -61. 8% for MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (MKTX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FRHC returned +71. 1% versus MKTX's +34. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FRHC or MKTX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MarketAxess Holdings Inc.
(MKTX) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 33β versus Freedom Holding Corp. 's 0. 95β — meaning FRHC is approximately -390% more volatile than MKTX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (MKTX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 161% for Freedom Holding Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FRHC or MKTX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Freedom Holding Corp.
(FRHC) is pulling ahead at 22. 7% versus 3. 8% for MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (MKTX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MarketAxess Holdings Inc. grew EPS -8. 5% year-over-year, compared to -77. 9% for Freedom Holding Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FRHC or MKTX?
MarketAxess Holdings Inc.
(MKTX) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 0% net margin versus 4. 2% for Freedom Holding Corp. — meaning it keeps 29. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MKTX leads at 41. 2% versus 31. 1% for FRHC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MKTX leads at 69. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FRHC or MKTX more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MKTX: 28.
1% to $195. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — FRHC or MKTX?
In this comparison, MKTX (2.
0% yield) pays a dividend. FRHC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FRHC or MKTX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MarketAxess Holdings Inc.
(MKTX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 33), 2. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MKTX: +34. 2%, FRHC: +71. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FRHC and MKTX?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FRHC is a small-cap high-growth stock; MKTX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. MKTX pays a dividend while FRHC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.