FRO vs DHT vs INSW vs TEN vs STNG

For growth investors, Frontline Ltd.

(FRO) is the stronger pick with 13. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) offers the better valuation at 8. 7x trailing P/E (6. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) is the cheapest at 8.

7x versus Frontline Ltd. at 17. 1x. On forward P/E, Frontline Ltd. is actually cheaper at 6. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited wins at 0. 09x versus Scorpio Tankers Inc. 's 0. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Frontline Ltd.

(FRO) delivered a total return of +465. 7%, compared to +282. 2% for DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSW returned +1015% versus STNG's +62. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), DHT Holdings, Inc.

(DHT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 27β versus International Seaways, Inc. 's 0. 43β — meaning INSW is approximately 58% more volatile than DHT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 160% for Frontline Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Frontline Ltd.

(FRO) is pulling ahead at 13. 8% versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DHT Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 17. 0% year-over-year, compared to -46. 5% for Scorpio Tankers Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FRO leads at 39. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

DHT Holdings, Inc.

(DHT) is the more profitable company, earning 42. 5% net margin versus 21. 9% for Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited — meaning it keeps 42. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FRO leads at 38. 1% versus 33. 0% for STNG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STNG leads at 46. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 09x versus Scorpio Tankers Inc. 's 0. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Frontline Ltd. (FRO) trades at 6. 0x forward P/E versus 8. 6x for Scorpio Tankers Inc. — 2. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TEN: 13. 6% to $50. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) offers the highest yield at 5. 5%, versus 2. 0% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG).

For long-horizon retirement investors, International Seaways, Inc.

(INSW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 43), 3. 2% yield, +1015% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSW: +1015%, TEN: +77. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.