FRO vs STNG

For growth investors, Frontline Ltd.

(FRO) is the stronger pick with 13. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) offers the better valuation at 12. 0x trailing P/E (8. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Scorpio Tankers Inc.

(STNG) is the cheapest at 12. 0x versus Frontline Ltd. at 17. 1x. On forward P/E, Frontline Ltd. is actually cheaper at 6. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Frontline Ltd. wins at 0. 26x versus Scorpio Tankers Inc. 's 0. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Frontline Ltd.

(FRO) delivered a total return of +465. 7%, compared to +359. 0% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FRO returned +513. 5% versus STNG's +62. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Scorpio Tankers Inc.

(STNG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus Frontline Ltd. 's 0. 36β — meaning FRO is approximately 27% more volatile than STNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 160% for Frontline Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Frontline Ltd.

(FRO) is pulling ahead at 13. 8% versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Frontline Ltd. grew EPS -24. 4% year-over-year, compared to -46. 5% for Scorpio Tankers Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FRO leads at 39. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Scorpio Tankers Inc.

(STNG) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 7% net margin versus 24. 2% for Frontline Ltd. — meaning it keeps 36. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FRO leads at 38. 1% versus 33. 0% for STNG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STNG leads at 46. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Frontline Ltd. (FRO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus Scorpio Tankers Inc. 's 0. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Frontline Ltd. (FRO) trades at 6. 0x forward P/E versus 8. 6x for Scorpio Tankers Inc. — 2. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FRO: 1. 0% to $38. 50.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Frontline Ltd. (FRO) offers the highest yield at 5. 1%, versus 2. 0% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Frontline Ltd.

(FRO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 36), 5. 1% yield, +513. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FRO: +513. 5%, STNG: +62. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.