Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FRPT vs CENT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
FRPT vs CENT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $2.69B | $2.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.14B | $3.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $200M | $171M |
| Gross Margin | 38.9% | 32.2% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | 8.2% |
| Forward P/E | 40.4x | 13.0x |
| Total Debt | $560M | $1.44B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $278M | $882M |
FRPT vs CENT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Freshpet, Inc. (FRPT) | 100 | 71.2 | -28.8% |
| Central Garden & Pe… (CENT) | 100 | 128.2 | +28.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FRPT vs CENT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FRPT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth 183.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.8%
- 5.2% 10Y total return vs CENT's 148.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.91, Low D/E 46.3%, current ratio 5.54x
CENT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.65
- Beta 0.65, current ratio 3.67x
- Lower P/E (13.0x vs 40.4x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.0% revenue growth vs CENT's -2.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.0x vs 40.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.6% margin vs CENT's 5.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs FRPT's 0.91 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.6% vs FRPT's -32.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.4% ROA vs CENT's 4.7%, ROIC 5.3% vs 9.1% |
FRPT vs CENT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FRPT vs CENT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FRPT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CENT is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 2.8x FRPT's $1.1B. FRPT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CENT's 5.4%. On growth, FRPT holds the edge at +13.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $165M | $302M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $200M | $171M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $223M | $282M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.9% | +32.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.8% | +8.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.6% | +5.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.6% | +8.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.1% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.5% | +30.6% |
Valuation Metrics
CENT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.4x trailing earnings, CENT trades at a 31% valuation discount to FRPT's 20.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CENT's 8.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FRPT's 16.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.7B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.0B | $2.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.80x | 14.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 40.42x | 12.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.82x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.37x | 8.15x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.44x | 0.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.55x | 1.48x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 217.70x | 7.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FRPT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FRPT delivers a 17.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $11 for CENT. FRPT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.46x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CENT's 0.91x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CENT scores 8/9 vs FRPT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.0% | +10.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.4% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.3% | +9.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.0% | +8.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | 0.91x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $282M | $558M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $278M | $882M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $560M | $1.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 13.29x | 1200.51x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CENT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CENT five years ago would be worth $7,926 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,189 for FRPT. Over the past 12 months, CENT leads with a +6.6% total return vs FRPT's -32.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CENT at 7.8% vs FRPT's -6.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.7% | +15.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -32.1% | +6.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.8% | +25.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.1% | -20.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +515.1% | +148.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.7% | +7.8% |
Risk & Volatility
CENT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CENT is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FRPT's 0.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CENT currently trades 89.3% from its 52-week high vs FRPT's 61.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.91x | 0.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $89.80 | $41.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $46.76 | $28.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.2% | +89.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.5 | 41.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 73K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FRPT as "Buy" and CENT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.5% upside for CENT (target: $51) vs 33.7% for FRPT (target: $73).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $73.42 | $51.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.8% |
CENT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). FRPT leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency).
FRPT vs CENT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FRPT or CENT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Freshpet, Inc.
(FRPT) is the stronger pick with 13. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 2% for Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT). Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) offers the better valuation at 14. 4x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Freshpet, Inc. (FRPT) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FRPT or CENT?
On trailing P/E, Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) is the cheapest at 14.
4x versus Freshpet, Inc. at 20. 8x. On forward P/E, Central Garden & Pet Company is actually cheaper at 13. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FRPT or CENT?
Over the past 5 years, Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) delivered a total return of -20.
7%, compared to -68. 1% for Freshpet, Inc. (FRPT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FRPT returned +515. 1% versus CENT's +148. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FRPT or CENT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
65β versus Freshpet, Inc. 's 0. 91β — meaning FRPT is approximately 39% more volatile than CENT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Freshpet, Inc. (FRPT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 46% versus 91% for Central Garden & Pet Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FRPT or CENT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Freshpet, Inc.
(FRPT) is pulling ahead at 13. 0% versus -2. 2% for Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Freshpet, Inc. grew EPS 183. 9% year-over-year, compared to 57. 4% for Central Garden & Pet Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, FRPT leads at 22. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FRPT or CENT?
Freshpet, Inc.
(FRPT) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 6% net margin versus 5. 2% for Central Garden & Pet Company — meaning it keeps 12. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FRPT leads at 8. 6% versus 8. 5% for CENT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FRPT leads at 38. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FRPT or CENT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) trades at 13.
0x forward P/E versus 40. 4x for Freshpet, Inc. — 27. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CENT: 38. 5% to $51. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FRPT or CENT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is FRPT or CENT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Freshpet, Inc.
(FRPT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 91), +515. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FRPT: +515. 1%, CENT: +148. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FRPT and CENT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FRPT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CENT is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.