Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FRPT vs CENT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FRPT
Freshpet, Inc.

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.69B
5Y Perf.-28.8%
CENT
Central Garden & Pet Company

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.29B
5Y Perf.+28.2%

FRPT vs CENT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FRPT logoFRPT
CENT logoCENT
IndustryPackaged FoodsPackaged Foods
Market Cap$2.69B$2.29B
Revenue (TTM)$1.14B$3.16B
Net Income (TTM)$200M$171M
Gross Margin38.9%32.2%
Operating Margin8.8%8.2%
Forward P/E40.4x13.0x
Total Debt$560M$1.44B
Cash & Equiv.$278M$882M

FRPT vs CENTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FRPT
CENT
StockMay 20May 26Return
Freshpet, Inc. (FRPT)10071.2-28.8%
Central Garden & Pe… (CENT)100128.2+28.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FRPT vs CENT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FRPT and CENT are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Central Garden & Pet Company is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FRPT
Freshpet, Inc.
The Growth Play

FRPT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth 183.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.8%
  • 5.2% 10Y total return vs CENT's 148.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.91, Low D/E 46.3%, current ratio 5.54x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
CENT
Central Garden & Pet Company
The Income Pick

CENT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.65
  • Beta 0.65, current ratio 3.67x
  • Lower P/E (13.0x vs 40.4x)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFRPT logoFRPT13.0% revenue growth vs CENT's -2.2%
ValueCENT logoCENTLower P/E (13.0x vs 40.4x)
Quality / MarginsFRPT logoFRPT17.6% margin vs CENT's 5.4%
Stability / SafetyCENT logoCENTBeta 0.65 vs FRPT's 0.91
DividendsTieNeither stock pays a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CENT logoCENT+6.6% vs FRPT's -32.1%
Efficiency (ROA)FRPT logoFRPT11.4% ROA vs CENT's 4.7%, ROIC 5.3% vs 9.1%

FRPT vs CENT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FRPTFreshpet, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$1.1B
CENTCentral Garden & Pet Company
FY 2025
Pet Products Segment
57.6%$1.8B
Garden Products Segment
42.4%$1.3B

FRPT vs CENT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCENTLAGGINGFRPT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FRPT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

CENT is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 2.8x FRPT's $1.1B. FRPT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CENT's 5.4%. On growth, FRPT holds the edge at +13.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFRPT logoFRPTFreshpet, Inc.CENT logoCENTCentral Garden & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.1B$3.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$165M$302M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$200M$171M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$223M$282M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+38.9%+32.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+8.8%+8.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+17.6%+5.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+19.6%+8.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+13.1%+8.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.5%+30.6%
FRPT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CENT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 14.4x trailing earnings, CENT trades at a 31% valuation discount to FRPT's 20.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CENT's 8.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FRPT's 16.4x.

MetricFRPT logoFRPTFreshpet, Inc.CENT logoCENTCentral Garden & …
Market CapShares × price$2.7B$2.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.0B$2.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS20.80x14.44x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.40.42x12.95x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate4.82x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple16.37x8.15x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.44x0.73x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.55x1.48x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF217.70x7.88x
CENT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FRPT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

FRPT delivers a 17.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $11 for CENT. FRPT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.46x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CENT's 0.91x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CENT scores 8/9 vs FRPT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFRPT logoFRPTFreshpet, Inc.CENT logoCENTCentral Garden & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+17.0%+10.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+11.4%+4.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.3%+9.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.0%+8.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–968
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.46x0.91x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$282M$558M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$278M$882M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$560M$1.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense13.29x1200.51x
FRPT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CENT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CENT five years ago would be worth $7,926 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,189 for FRPT. Over the past 12 months, CENT leads with a +6.6% total return vs FRPT's -32.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CENT at 7.8% vs FRPT's -6.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFRPT logoFRPTFreshpet, Inc.CENT logoCENTCentral Garden & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-8.7%+15.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-32.1%+6.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-18.8%+25.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-68.1%-20.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+515.1%+148.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-6.7%+7.8%
CENT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

CENT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

CENT is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FRPT's 0.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CENT currently trades 89.3% from its 52-week high vs FRPT's 61.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFRPT logoFRPTFreshpet, Inc.CENT logoCENTCentral Garden & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.91x0.65x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$89.80$41.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$46.76$28.77
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+61.2%+89.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10036.541.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.5M73K
CENT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates FRPT as "Buy" and CENT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.5% upside for CENT (target: $51) vs 33.7% for FRPT (target: $73).

MetricFRPT logoFRPTFreshpet, Inc.CENT logoCENTCentral Garden & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$73.42$51.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts2910
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+6.8%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

CENT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). FRPT leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency).

Best OverallCentral Garden & Pet Company (CENT)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FRPT vs CENT: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FRPT or CENT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Freshpet, Inc.

(FRPT) is the stronger pick with 13. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 2% for Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT). Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) offers the better valuation at 14. 4x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Freshpet, Inc. (FRPT) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FRPT or CENT?

On trailing P/E, Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) is the cheapest at 14.

4x versus Freshpet, Inc. at 20. 8x. On forward P/E, Central Garden & Pet Company is actually cheaper at 13. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FRPT or CENT?

Over the past 5 years, Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) delivered a total return of -20.

7%, compared to -68. 1% for Freshpet, Inc. (FRPT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FRPT returned +515. 1% versus CENT's +148. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FRPT or CENT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

65β versus Freshpet, Inc. 's 0. 91β — meaning FRPT is approximately 39% more volatile than CENT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Freshpet, Inc. (FRPT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 46% versus 91% for Central Garden & Pet Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FRPT or CENT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Freshpet, Inc.

(FRPT) is pulling ahead at 13. 0% versus -2. 2% for Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Freshpet, Inc. grew EPS 183. 9% year-over-year, compared to 57. 4% for Central Garden & Pet Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, FRPT leads at 22. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FRPT or CENT?

Freshpet, Inc.

(FRPT) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 6% net margin versus 5. 2% for Central Garden & Pet Company — meaning it keeps 12. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FRPT leads at 8. 6% versus 8. 5% for CENT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FRPT leads at 38. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FRPT or CENT more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) trades at 13.

0x forward P/E versus 40. 4x for Freshpet, Inc. — 27. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CENT: 38. 5% to $51. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FRPT or CENT?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is FRPT or CENT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Freshpet, Inc.

(FRPT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 91), +515. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FRPT: +515. 1%, CENT: +148. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FRPT and CENT?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FRPT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CENT is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

FRPT

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CENT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FRPT and CENT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FRPT: 13.1% · CENT: 8.7%)
Net Margin>
%
(FRPT: 17.6% · CENT: 5.4%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(FRPT: 20.8x · CENT: 14.4x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.