FRSX
Foresight Autonomous Holdings Ltd.
Auto - Parts
Market Cap$4M
5Y Perf.-99.8%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
FRSX vs LIDR vs INVZ vs LAZR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
LIDR
AEye, Inc.
Auto - Parts
Market Cap$90M
5Y Perf.-99.4%
INVZ
Innoviz Technologies Ltd.
Auto - Parts
Market Cap$124M
5Y Perf.-94.4%
LAZR
Luminar Technologies, Inc.
Auto - Parts
Market Cap$2M
5Y Perf.-100.0%
FRSX vs LIDR vs INVZ vs LAZR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | FRSX | LIDR | INVZ | LAZR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts |
| Market Cap | $4M | $90M | $124M | $2M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $460K | $233K | $55M | $76M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $-34M | $-68M | $-234M |
| Gross Margin | 60.0% | -137.8% | 23.4% | -21.3% |
| Operating Margin | -27.4% | -136.2% | -123.0% | -332.8% |
| Total Debt | $2M | $235K | $65M | $535M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $43M | $9M | $83M |
FRSX vs LIDR vs INVZ vs LAZR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
FRSX
LIDR
INVZ
LAZR
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Foresight Autonomou… (FRSX) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
| AEye, Inc. (LIDR) | 100 | 0.6 | -99.4% |
| Innoviz Technologie… (INVZ) | 100 | 5.6 | -94.4% |
| Luminar Technologie… (LAZR) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FRSX vs LIDR vs INVZ vs LAZR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: INVZ leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Foresight Autonomous Holdings Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. LIDR also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FRSX
Foresight Autonomous Holdings Ltd.
The Income Pick
FRSX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- beta 2.01
- Beta 2.01, current ratio 4.50x
- Beta 2.01 vs INVZ's 2.73, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and defensive
LIDR
AEye, Inc.
The Defensive Pick
LIDR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.37, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 10.46x
- +254.0% vs LAZR's -98.4%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
INVZ
Innoviz Technologies Ltd.
The Growth Play
INVZ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 127.0%, EPS growth 40.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 109.1%
- -92.5% 10Y total return vs LIDR's -99.4%
- 127.0% revenue growth vs FRSX's -12.3%
- -123.1% margin vs LIDR's -145.7%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
LAZR
Luminar Technologies, Inc.
The Secondary Option
LAZR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | INVZ | 127.0% revenue growth vs FRSX's -12.3% |
| Quality / Margins | INVZ | -123.1% margin vs LIDR's -145.7% |
| Stability / Safety | FRSX | Beta 2.01 vs INVZ's 2.73, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | LIDR | +254.0% vs LAZR's -98.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | INVZ | -49.0% ROA vs FRSX's -142.7%, ROIC -46.9% vs -5.9% |
FRSX vs LIDR vs INVZ vs LAZR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
FRSX vs LIDR vs INVZ vs LAZR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLLIDRLAGGINGLAZR
Who Leads Where
LIDR leads in 2 of 6 categories
INVZ leads 1 • FRSX leads 0 • LAZR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓LAZRLuminar Technologies,…
0leads
FRSXForesight Autonomous …
0leads
INVZInnoviz Technologies …
1leads
LIDRAEye, Inc.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs INVZvs FRSXMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
INVZ3/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
LIDR5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
LIDR4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INVZ leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LAZR is the larger business by revenue, generating $76M annually — 325.1x LIDR's $233,000. INVZ is the more profitable business, keeping -123.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LIDR's -145.7%. On growth, LIDR holds the edge at +110.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FRSXForesight Autonom… | LIDRAEye, Inc. | INVZInnoviz Technolog… | LAZRLuminar Technolog… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $460,000 | $233,000 | $55M | $76M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$12M | -$32M | -$62M | -$229M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | -$34M | -$68M | -$234M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | -$20M | -$52M | -$209M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +60.0% | -137.8% | +23.4% | -21.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -27.4% | -136.2% | -123.0% | -3.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -26.5% | -145.7% | -123.1% | -3.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -24.5% | -86.1% | -94.4% | -2.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.1% | +110.9% | +110.3% | +21.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +31.7% | -41.7% | +9.1% | -2.6% |
INVZ leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FRSX and INVZ and LAZR each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FRSXForesight Autonom… | LIDRAEye, Inc. | INVZInnoviz Technolog… | LAZRLuminar Technolog… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4M | $90M | $124M | $2M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$1M | $47M | $180M | $454M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.39x | -1.35x | -2.15x | -0.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 10.15x | 384.80x | 2.25x | 0.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.66x | 5.66x | 1.88x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Evenly matched — FRSX and INVZ and LAZR each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LIDR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LIDR delivers a -72.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-73 in annual profit, vs $-2 for FRSX. LIDR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to INVZ's 0.83x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LIDR scores 5/9 vs FRSX's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | FRSXForesight Autonom… | LIDRAEye, Inc. | INVZInnoviz Technolog… | LAZRLuminar Technolog… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.2% | -72.7% | -87.2% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -142.7% | -59.2% | -49.0% | -81.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.9% | -100.7% | -46.9% | -123.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -100.8% | -64.7% | -64.1% | -118.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | 0.00x | 0.83x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$6M | -$43M | $56M | $452M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $43M | $9M | $83M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $235,000 | $65M | $535M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1408.44x | -9.65x | -39.12x | -3.73x |
LIDR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LIDR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INVZ five years ago would be worth $787 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2 for LAZR. Over the past 12 months, LIDR leads with a +254.0% total return vs LAZR's -98.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LIDR at -31.9% vs LAZR's -91.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FRSXForesight Autonom… | LIDRAEye, Inc. | INVZInnoviz Technolog… | LAZRLuminar Technolog… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -54.3% | -5.7% | -24.1% | -24.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -85.2% | +254.0% | +0.2% | -98.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.4% | -68.4% | -71.3% | -99.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | -99.3% | -92.1% | -100.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -99.4% | -92.5% | -100.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -64.2% | -31.9% | -34.0% | -91.4% |
LIDR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FRSX and LIDR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FRSX is the less volatile stock with a 2.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INVZ's 2.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LIDR currently trades 30.9% from its 52-week high vs LAZR's 1.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FRSXForesight Autonom… | LIDRAEye, Inc. | INVZInnoviz Technolog… | LAZRLuminar Technolog… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.01x | 2.37x | 2.73x | 2.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.57 | $6.44 | $2.54 | $4.82 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.97 | $0.50 | $0.58 | $0.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +12.8% | +30.9% | +28.8% | +1.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 32.0 | 49.4 | 50.7 | 36.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 123K | 5.0M | 2.4M | 418K |
Evenly matched — FRSX and LIDR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FRSX as "Buy", LIDR as "Hold", INVZ as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 503.0% upside for LIDR (target: $12) vs 173.4% for INVZ (target: $2).
| Metric | FRSXForesight Autonom… | LIDRAEye, Inc. | INVZInnoviz Technolog… | LAZRLuminar Technolog… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $12.00 | $2.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 4 | 5 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
LIDR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). INVZ leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
Best OverallAEye, Inc. (LIDR)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
FRSX vs LIDR vs INVZ vs LAZR: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FRSX or LIDR or INVZ or LAZR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Innoviz Technologies Ltd.
(INVZ) is the stronger pick with 127. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 3% for Foresight Autonomous Holdings Ltd. (FRSX). Analysts rate Foresight Autonomous Holdings Ltd. (FRSX) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FRSX or LIDR or INVZ or LAZR?
Over the past 5 years, Innoviz Technologies Ltd.
(INVZ) delivered a total return of -92. 1%, compared to -100. 0% for Luminar Technologies, Inc. (LAZR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INVZ returned -92. 5% versus LAZR's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FRSX or LIDR or INVZ or LAZR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Foresight Autonomous Holdings Ltd.
(FRSX) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 01β versus Innoviz Technologies Ltd. 's 2. 73β — meaning INVZ is approximately 36% more volatile than FRSX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AEye, Inc. (LIDR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 83% for Innoviz Technologies Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — FRSX or LIDR or INVZ or LAZR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Innoviz Technologies Ltd.
(INVZ) is pulling ahead at 127. 0% versus -12. 3% for Foresight Autonomous Holdings Ltd. (FRSX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Luminar Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 60. 5% year-over-year, compared to -226. 7% for AEye, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, INVZ leads at 109. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FRSX or LIDR or INVZ or LAZR?
Innoviz Technologies Ltd.
(INVZ) is the more profitable company, earning -123. 1% net margin versus -145. 7% for AEye, Inc. — meaning it keeps -123. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INVZ leads at -123. 0% versus -136. 2% for LIDR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FRSX leads at 60. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — FRSX or LIDR or INVZ or LAZR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is FRSX or LIDR or INVZ or LAZR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Innoviz Technologies Ltd.
(INVZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Luminar Technologies, Inc. (LAZR) carries a higher beta of 2. 40 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (INVZ: -92. 5%, LAZR: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between FRSX and LIDR and INVZ and LAZR?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FRSX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LIDR is a small-cap high-growth stock; INVZ is a small-cap high-growth stock; LAZR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(FRSX: 4.1% · LIDR: 110.9%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.