Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FSHP vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Diversified
FSHP vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $97M | $825.89B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $270.79B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $58.03B |
| Gross Margin | — | 58.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | 27.7% |
| Forward P/E | 109.4x | 13.8x |
| Total Debt | $678K | $751.15B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $77K | $469.32B |
FSHP vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flag Ship Acquisiti… (FSHP) | 100 | 109.5 | +9.5% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 136.3 | +36.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FSHP vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FSHP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.00, yield 1.9%
- EPS growth 439.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.00, Low D/E 1.0%, current ratio 0.24x
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 461.3% 10Y total return vs FSHP's 9.5%
- Lower P/E (13.8x vs 109.4x)
- +25.2% vs FSHP's +5.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.1% NII/revenue growth vs JPM's 14.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.8x vs 109.4x) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.00 vs JPM's 1.00, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +25.2% vs FSHP's +5.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC -1.9% vs 5.4% |
FSHP vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FSHP vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FSHP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM and FSHP operate at a comparable scale, with $270.8B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $270.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $546,034 | $81.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | $58.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$644,249 | -$119.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +58.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +27.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +21.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -15.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +43.3% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FSHP and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.5x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 86% valuation discount to FSHP's 109.4x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $97M | $825.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $98M | $1.11T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 109.40x | 15.51x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.19x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 13.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.41x | 2.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — FSHP and JPM each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 16.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $3 for FSHP. FSHP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JPM scores 5/9 vs FSHP's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.7% | +16.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.4% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.9% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.5% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 2.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $601,104 | $281.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $76,747 | $469.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $677,851 | $751.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $20,430 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,951 for FSHP. Over the past 12 months, JPM leads with a +25.2% total return vs FSHP's +5.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 32.9% vs FSHP's 3.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.8% | -5.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.4% | +25.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.5% | +134.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.5% | +104.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.5% | +461.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.1% | +32.9% |
Risk & Volatility
FSHP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FSHP is the less volatile stock with a 0.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 1.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FSHP currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs JPM's 90.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.00x | 1.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.00 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.37 | $248.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.5% | +90.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.5 | 59.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4K | 8.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FSHP and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, FSHP offers the higher dividend yield at 1.86% vs JPM's 1.68%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $338.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.20 | $5.13 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.5% |
FSHP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). JPM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
FSHP vs JPM: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FSHP or JPM a better buy right now?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (13. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FSHP or JPM?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 15. 5x versus Flag Ship Acquisition Corporation at 109. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FSHP or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +104. 3%, compared to +9. 5% for Flag Ship Acquisition Corporation (FSHP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +461. 3% versus FSHP's +9. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FSHP or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Flag Ship Acquisition Corporation (FSHP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
00β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 1. 00β — meaning JPM is approximately 125388% more volatile than FSHP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Flag Ship Acquisition Corporation (FSHP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FSHP or JPM?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flag Ship Acquisition Corporation grew EPS 439.
0% year-over-year, compared to 21. 7% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FSHP or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 6% net margin versus 0. 0% for Flag Ship Acquisition Corporation — meaning it keeps 21. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 27. 7% versus 0. 0% for FSHP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 58. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — FSHP or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Flag Ship Acquisition Corporation (FSHP) offers the highest yield at 1. 9%, versus 1. 7% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).
08Is FSHP or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Flag Ship Acquisition Corporation (FSHP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
00), 1. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FSHP: +9. 5%, JPM: +461. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FSHP and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FSHP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.