Financial - Conglomerates
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FSHPR vs MS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
FSHPR vs MS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Conglomerates | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $157K | $307.53B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $103.14B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $910K | $16.18B |
| Gross Margin | — | 55.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | 17.1% |
| Forward P/E | 0.3x | 16.3x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $360.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $77K | $75.74B |
FSHPR vs MS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flag Ship Acquisiti… (FSHPR) | 100 | 57.1 | -42.9% |
| Morgan Stanley (MS) | 100 | 158.8 | +58.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FSHPR vs MS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FSHPR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.07, yield 100.0%
- EPS growth 9.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.07, current ratio 0.24x
MS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.4% 10Y total return vs FSHPR's -33.4%
- +66.7% vs FSHPR's -39.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Value | Lower P/E (0.3x vs 16.3x) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.07 vs MS's 1.37 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs MS's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +66.7% vs FSHPR's -39.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.6% ROA vs MS's 1.2% |
FSHPR vs MS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FSHPR vs MS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MS and FSHPR operate at a comparable scale, with $103.1B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $103.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $26.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $16.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$6.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +55.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +17.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +13.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -2.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +48.9% |
Valuation Metrics
FSHPR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.3x trailing earnings, FSHPR trades at a 99% valuation discount to MS's 24.3x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $156,844 | $307.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $80,097 | $592.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.32x | 24.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 16.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.73x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 26.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.95x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FSHPR leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MS scores 5/9 vs FSHPR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +14.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.6% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +2.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +3.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 3.42x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$76,747 | $284.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $76,747 | $75.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $360.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MS five years ago would be worth $24,217 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,658 for FSHPR. Over the past 12 months, MS leads with a +66.7% total return vs FSHPR's -39.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MS at 34.3% vs FSHPR's -12.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -45.1% | +7.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -39.1% | +66.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.4% | +142.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.4% | +142.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.4% | +739.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.7% | +34.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FSHPR and MS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FSHPR is the less volatile stock with a 1.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MS's 1.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MS currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs FSHPR's 36.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.07x | 1.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.22 | $194.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.00 | $117.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +36.5% | +99.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.7 | 61.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2K | 5.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FSHPR and MS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, FSHPR offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs MS's 1.97%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $205.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.49 | $3.81 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.4% |
FSHPR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). MS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
FSHPR vs MS: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FSHPR or MS a better buy right now?
Flag Ship Acquisition Corporation (FSHPR) offers the better valuation at 0.
3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Morgan Stanley (MS) a "Buy" — based on 52 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FSHPR or MS?
On trailing P/E, Flag Ship Acquisition Corporation (FSHPR) is the cheapest at 0.
3x versus Morgan Stanley at 24. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FSHPR or MS?
Over the past 5 years, Morgan Stanley (MS) delivered a total return of +142.
2%, compared to -33. 4% for Flag Ship Acquisition Corporation (FSHPR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MS returned +739. 4% versus FSHPR's -33. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FSHPR or MS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Flag Ship Acquisition Corporation (FSHPR) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
07β versus Morgan Stanley's 1. 37β — meaning MS is approximately 27% more volatile than FSHPR relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — FSHPR or MS?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flag Ship Acquisition Corporation grew EPS 947.
5% year-over-year, compared to 53. 5% for Morgan Stanley. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FSHPR or MS?
Morgan Stanley (MS) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
0% net margin versus 0. 0% for Flag Ship Acquisition Corporation — meaning it keeps 13. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MS leads at 17. 1% versus 0. 0% for FSHPR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MS leads at 55. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — FSHPR or MS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Flag Ship Acquisition Corporation (FSHPR) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 2. 0% for Morgan Stanley (MS).
08Is FSHPR or MS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Morgan Stanley (MS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2.
0% yield, +739. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MS: +739. 4%, FSHPR: -33. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FSHPR and MS?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FSHPR is a small-cap deep-value stock; MS is a large-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.