Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FSHPR vs MS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FSHPR
Flag Ship Acquisition Corporation

Financial - Conglomerates

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$157K
5Y Perf.-42.9%
MS
Morgan Stanley

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$307.53B
5Y Perf.+58.8%

FSHPR vs MS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FSHPR logoFSHPR
MS logoMS
IndustryFinancial - ConglomeratesFinancial - Capital Markets
Market Cap$157K$307.53B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$103.14B
Net Income (TTM)$910K$16.18B
Gross Margin55.6%
Operating Margin17.1%
Forward P/E0.3x16.3x
Total Debt$0.00$360.49B
Cash & Equiv.$77K$75.74B

FSHPR vs MSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FSHPR
MS
StockAug 24May 26Return
Flag Ship Acquisiti… (FSHPR)10057.1-42.9%
Morgan Stanley (MS)100158.8+58.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FSHPR vs MS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FSHPR leads in 4 of 5 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. Morgan Stanley is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FSHPR
Flag Ship Acquisition Corporation
The Banking Pick

FSHPR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.07, yield 100.0%
  • EPS growth 9.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.07, current ratio 0.24x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
MS
Morgan Stanley
The Banking Pick

MS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 7.4% 10Y total return vs FSHPR's -33.4%
  • +66.7% vs FSHPR's -39.1%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
ValueFSHPR logoFSHPRLower P/E (0.3x vs 16.3x)
Stability / SafetyFSHPR logoFSHPRBeta 1.07 vs MS's 1.37
DividendsFSHPR logoFSHPR100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs MS's 2.0%
Momentum (1Y)MS logoMS+66.7% vs FSHPR's -39.1%
Efficiency (ROA)FSHPR logoFSHPR2.6% ROA vs MS's 1.2%

FSHPR vs MS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FSHPRFlag Ship Acquisition Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

MSMorgan Stanley
FY 2024
Wealth Management Segment
45.6%$28.4B
Institutional Securities Segment
45.0%$28.1B
Investment Management Segment
9.4%$5.9B

FSHPR vs MS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFSHPRLAGGINGMS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

MS and FSHPR operate at a comparable scale, with $103.1B and $0 in trailing revenue.

MetricFSHPR logoFSHPRFlag Ship Acquisi…MS logoMSMorgan Stanley
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$103.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$26.3B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$16.2B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$6.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+55.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+17.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+13.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-2.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+48.9%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Valuation Metrics

FSHPR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

At 0.3x trailing earnings, FSHPR trades at a 99% valuation discount to MS's 24.3x P/E.

MetricFSHPR logoFSHPRFlag Ship Acquisi…MS logoMSMorgan Stanley
Market CapShares × price$156,844$307.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$80,097$592.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS0.32x24.31x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.16.28x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.73x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple26.03x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.98x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.95x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
FSHPR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Profitability & Efficiency

FSHPR leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MS scores 5/9 vs FSHPR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricFSHPR logoFSHPRFlag Ship Acquisi…MS logoMSMorgan Stanley
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+14.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.6%+1.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+2.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+3.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–925
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage3.42x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$76,747$284.7B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$76,747$75.7B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$360.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.44x
FSHPR leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MS five years ago would be worth $24,217 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,658 for FSHPR. Over the past 12 months, MS leads with a +66.7% total return vs FSHPR's -39.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MS at 34.3% vs FSHPR's -12.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFSHPR logoFSHPRFlag Ship Acquisi…MS logoMSMorgan Stanley
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-45.1%+7.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-39.1%+66.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-33.4%+142.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-33.4%+142.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-33.4%+739.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-12.7%+34.3%
MS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FSHPR and MS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

FSHPR is the less volatile stock with a 1.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MS's 1.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MS currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs FSHPR's 36.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFSHPR logoFSHPRFlag Ship Acquisi…MS logoMSMorgan Stanley
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.07x1.37x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$0.22$194.83
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.00$117.21
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+36.5%+99.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10046.761.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2K5.4M
Evenly matched — FSHPR and MS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — FSHPR and MS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

For income investors, FSHPR offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs MS's 1.97%.

MetricFSHPR logoFSHPRFlag Ship Acquisi…MS logoMSMorgan Stanley
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$205.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts52
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+100.0%+2.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises111
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.49$3.81
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.4%
Evenly matched — FSHPR and MS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FSHPR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). MS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallFlag Ship Acquisition Corpo… (FSHPR)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FSHPR vs MS: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FSHPR or MS a better buy right now?

Flag Ship Acquisition Corporation (FSHPR) offers the better valuation at 0.

3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Morgan Stanley (MS) a "Buy" — based on 52 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FSHPR or MS?

On trailing P/E, Flag Ship Acquisition Corporation (FSHPR) is the cheapest at 0.

3x versus Morgan Stanley at 24. 3x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FSHPR or MS?

Over the past 5 years, Morgan Stanley (MS) delivered a total return of +142.

2%, compared to -33. 4% for Flag Ship Acquisition Corporation (FSHPR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MS returned +739. 4% versus FSHPR's -33. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FSHPR or MS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Flag Ship Acquisition Corporation (FSHPR) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

07β versus Morgan Stanley's 1. 37β — meaning MS is approximately 27% more volatile than FSHPR relative to the S&P 500.

05

Which is growing faster — FSHPR or MS?

On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flag Ship Acquisition Corporation grew EPS 947.

5% year-over-year, compared to 53. 5% for Morgan Stanley. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FSHPR or MS?

Morgan Stanley (MS) is the more profitable company, earning 13.

0% net margin versus 0. 0% for Flag Ship Acquisition Corporation — meaning it keeps 13. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MS leads at 17. 1% versus 0. 0% for FSHPR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MS leads at 55. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Which pays a better dividend — FSHPR or MS?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Flag Ship Acquisition Corporation (FSHPR) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 2. 0% for Morgan Stanley (MS).

08

Is FSHPR or MS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Morgan Stanley (MS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2.

0% yield, +739. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MS: +739. 4%, FSHPR: -33. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between FSHPR and MS?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FSHPR is a small-cap deep-value stock; MS is a large-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

FSHPR

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $20B
  • Dividend Yield > 40.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MS

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FSHPR and MS on the metrics below

P/E Ratio<
x
(FSHPR: 0.3x · MS: 24.3x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.