FSI vs HNNA

For growth investors, Hennessy Advisors, Inc.

(HNNA) is the stronger pick with 19. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 2% for Flexible Solutions International, Inc. (FSI). Hennessy Advisors, Inc. (HNNA) offers the better valuation at 8. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Hennessy Advisors, Inc.

(HNNA) is the cheapest at 8. 0x versus Flexible Solutions International, Inc. at 26. 2x.

Over the past 5 years, Flexible Solutions International, Inc.

(FSI) delivered a total return of +100. 9%, compared to +37. 6% for Hennessy Advisors, Inc. (HNNA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FSI returned +402. 2% versus HNNA's -35. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hennessy Advisors, Inc.

(HNNA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 30β versus Flexible Solutions International, Inc. 's 0. 96β — meaning FSI is approximately 219% more volatile than HNNA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Flexible Solutions International, Inc. (FSI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 26% versus 41% for Hennessy Advisors, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hennessy Advisors, Inc.

(HNNA) is pulling ahead at 19. 9% versus -0. 2% for Flexible Solutions International, Inc. (FSI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hennessy Advisors, Inc. grew EPS 38. 0% year-over-year, compared to 9. 1% for Flexible Solutions International, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Hennessy Advisors, Inc.

(HNNA) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 0% net margin versus 7. 9% for Flexible Solutions International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HNNA leads at 37. 0% versus 14. 4% for FSI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HNNA leads at 70. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Hennessy Advisors, Inc. (HNNA) offers the highest yield at 5. 3%, versus 1. 6% for Flexible Solutions International, Inc. (FSI).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Hennessy Advisors, Inc.

(HNNA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 30), 5. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HNNA: -35. 0%, FSI: +402. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (FSI (Basic Materials) and HNNA (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FSI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HNNA is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.