Chemicals - Specialty
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FSI vs NTIC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
FSI vs NTIC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $80M | $76M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $39M | $86M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $-306K |
| Gross Margin | 32.5% | 37.0% |
| Operating Margin | 21.0% | -4.3% |
| Forward P/E | 26.2x | 4438.9x |
| Total Debt | $11M | $13M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $7M |
FSI vs NTIC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flexible Solutions … (FSI) | 100 | 378.3 | +278.3% |
| Northern Technologi… (NTIC) | 100 | 107.8 | +7.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FSI vs NTIC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -0.2%, EPS growth 9.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.6%
- 402.2% 10Y total return vs NTIC's 39.6%
- -0.2% revenue growth vs NTIC's -1.0%
NTIC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.38, yield 2.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.38, Low D/E 17.1%, current ratio 1.86x
- Beta 0.38, yield 2.0%, current ratio 1.86x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -0.2% revenue growth vs NTIC's -1.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (26.2x vs 4438.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs NTIC's -0.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs FSI's 0.96, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, vs FSI's 1.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +77.2% vs NTIC's +10.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.1% ROA vs NTIC's -0.3%, ROIC 9.4% vs -5.6% |
FSI vs NTIC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FSI vs NTIC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTIC is the larger business by revenue, generating $86M annually — 2.2x FSI's $39M. FSI is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NTIC's -0.4%. On growth, FSI holds the edge at +13.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $39M | $86M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $10M | -$2M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | -$305,653 |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | -$3M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.5% | +37.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.0% | -4.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | -0.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.1% | -3.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.3% | +9.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +86.7% | -47.8% |
Valuation Metrics
NTIC leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.2x trailing earnings, FSI trades at a 99% valuation discount to NTIC's 4438.9x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $80M | $76M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $83M | $82M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 26.17x | 4438.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.10x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.16x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.08x | 0.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.93x | 1.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 132.03x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FSI leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FSI delivers a 10.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-0 for NTIC. NTIC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FSI's 0.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FSI scores 6/9 vs NTIC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.9% | -0.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.1% | -0.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.4% | -5.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.8% | -7.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.26x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | $6M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $7M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11M | $13M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.64x | 5.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FSI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FSI five years ago would be worth $20,092 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,931 for NTIC. Over the past 12 months, FSI leads with a +77.2% total return vs NTIC's +10.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FSI at 31.8% vs NTIC's -9.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.8% | -1.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +77.2% | +10.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +129.0% | -24.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +100.9% | -40.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +402.2% | +39.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +31.8% | -9.1% |
Risk & Volatility
NTIC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NTIC is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FSI's 0.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NTIC currently trades 79.7% from its 52-week high vs FSI's 54.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.96x | 0.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.48 | $10.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.55 | $7.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.7% | +79.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.3 | 44.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 19K | 10K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FSI and NTIC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, NTIC offers the higher dividend yield at 1.97% vs FSI's 1.58%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.6% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.10 | $0.16 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FSI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NTIC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
FSI vs NTIC: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FSI or NTIC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Flexible Solutions International, Inc.
(FSI) is the stronger pick with -0. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 0% for Northern Technologies International Corporation (NTIC). Flexible Solutions International, Inc. (FSI) offers the better valuation at 26. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FSI or NTIC?
On trailing P/E, Flexible Solutions International, Inc.
(FSI) is the cheapest at 26. 2x versus Northern Technologies International Corporation at 4438. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FSI or NTIC?
Over the past 5 years, Flexible Solutions International, Inc.
(FSI) delivered a total return of +100. 9%, compared to -40. 7% for Northern Technologies International Corporation (NTIC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FSI returned +402. 2% versus NTIC's +39. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FSI or NTIC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Northern Technologies International Corporation (NTIC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
38β versus Flexible Solutions International, Inc. 's 0. 96β — meaning FSI is approximately 156% more volatile than NTIC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Northern Technologies International Corporation (NTIC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 26% for Flexible Solutions International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FSI or NTIC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flexible Solutions International, Inc.
(FSI) is pulling ahead at -0. 2% versus -1. 0% for Northern Technologies International Corporation (NTIC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flexible Solutions International, Inc. grew EPS 9. 1% year-over-year, compared to -99. 7% for Northern Technologies International Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTIC leads at 4. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FSI or NTIC?
Flexible Solutions International, Inc.
(FSI) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 9% net margin versus 0. 0% for Northern Technologies International Corporation — meaning it keeps 7. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FSI leads at 14. 4% versus -7. 1% for NTIC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTIC leads at 37. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — FSI or NTIC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Northern Technologies International Corporation (NTIC) offers the highest yield at 2. 0%, versus 1. 6% for Flexible Solutions International, Inc. (FSI).
08Is FSI or NTIC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Northern Technologies International Corporation (NTIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
38), 2. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTIC: +39. 6%, FSI: +402. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FSI and NTIC?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.