Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FSLR vs CSIQ vs SPWR vs JKS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FSLR
First Solar, Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$23.06B
5Y Perf.+3.5%
CSIQ
Canadian Solar Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • CA
Market Cap$1.18B
5Y Perf.-51.1%
SPWR
SunPower Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$866M
5Y Perf.-70.0%
JKS
JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd.

Solar

EnergyNYSE • CN
Market Cap$306M
5Y Perf.-45.0%

FSLR vs CSIQ vs SPWR vs JKS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FSLR logoFSLR
CSIQ logoCSIQ
SPWR logoSPWR
JKS logoJKS
IndustrySolarSolarSolarSolar
Market Cap$23.06B$1.18B$866M$306M
Revenue (TTM)$5.42B$5.60B$315M$75.16B
Net Income (TTM)$1.67B$-104M$-42M$-2.52B
Gross Margin41.7%18.3%50.4%7.3%
Operating Margin33.0%0.1%-2.7%-8.2%
Forward P/E12.0x5.1x
Total Debt$499M$7.68B$188M$53.16B
Cash & Equiv.$2.80B$1.91B$10M$22.95B

FSLR vs CSIQ vs SPWR vs JKSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FSLR
CSIQ
SPWR
JKS
StockJul 23May 26Return
First Solar, Inc. (FSLR)100103.5+3.5%
Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ)10048.9-51.1%
SunPower Inc. (SPWR)10030.0-70.0%
JinkoSolar Holding … (JKS)10055.0-45.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FSLR vs CSIQ vs SPWR vs JKS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FSLR leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Canadian Solar Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. SPWR and JKS also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FSLR
First Solar, Inc.
The Growth Play

FSLR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 24.1%, EPS growth 18.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.8%
  • 324.1% 10Y total return vs JKS's 40.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.39, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 2.67x
  • Beta 1.39, current ratio 2.67x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
CSIQ
Canadian Solar Inc.
The Momentum Pick

CSIQ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.

  • +97.1% vs SPWR's -42.4%
Best for: momentum
SPWR
SunPower Inc.
The Income Pick

SPWR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.13
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: income & stability
JKS
JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd.
The Income Pick

JKS is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.

  • 23.5% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: dividends
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFSLR logoFSLR24.1% revenue growth vs JKS's -30.9%
ValueSPWR logoSPWRBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsFSLR logoFSLR30.7% margin vs SPWR's -13.2%
Stability / SafetyFSLR logoFSLRBeta 1.39 vs CSIQ's 2.23, lower leverage
DividendsJKS logoJKS23.5% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CSIQ logoCSIQ+97.1% vs SPWR's -42.4%
Efficiency (ROA)FSLR logoFSLR12.6% ROA vs SPWR's -19.5%, ROIC 17.6% vs -5.3%

FSLR vs CSIQ vs SPWR vs JKS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FSLRFirst Solar, Inc.
FY 2025
Solar Module
100.0%$15.0B
CSIQCanadian Solar Inc.
FY 2024
Electricity
100.0%$85M
SPWRSunPower Inc.
FY 2024
Reportable Subsegments
100.0%$109M
JKSJinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd.
FY 2025
Sales of Other Solar Materials
100.0%$3.0B

FSLR vs CSIQ vs SPWR vs JKS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFSLRLAGGINGJKS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FSLR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

JKS is the larger business by revenue, generating $75.2B annually — 239.0x SPWR's $315M. FSLR is the more profitable business, keeping 30.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPWR's -13.2%. On growth, FSLR holds the edge at +23.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…SPWR logoSPWRSunPower Inc.JKS logoJKSJinkoSolar Holdin…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$5.4B$5.6B$315M$75.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$2.2B$284M-$6M-$3.8B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$1.7B-$104M-$42M-$2.5B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$1.7B-$1.7B-$15M$0
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+41.7%+18.3%+50.4%+7.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+33.0%+0.1%-2.7%-8.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+30.7%-1.9%-13.2%-3.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+30.8%-29.6%-4.6%-3.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+23.6%-20.0%-0.2%-34.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+65.1%-3.7%-101.3%-33.5%
FSLR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — SPWR and JKS each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
MetricFSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…SPWR logoSPWRSunPower Inc.JKS logoJKSJinkoSolar Holdin…
Market CapShares × price$23.1B$1.2B$866M$306M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$20.8B$7.0B$1.0B$4.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS15.10x-11.41x-15.25x-0.48x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.04x5.10x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.49x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.38x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.42x0.21x2.80x0.03x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.42x0.28x0.07x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF19.42x
Evenly matched — SPWR and JKS each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FSLR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

FSLR delivers a 18.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-8 for JKS. FSLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JKS's 1.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FSLR scores 7/9 vs CSIQ's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…SPWR logoSPWRSunPower Inc.JKS logoJKSJinkoSolar Holdin…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+18.0%-2.5%-7.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+12.6%-0.7%-19.5%-2.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+17.6%-0.2%-5.3%-9.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+15.9%-0.3%-7.2%-10.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–97153
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.05x1.80x1.93x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$2.3B$5.8B$179M$30.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2.8B$1.9B$10M$23.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$499M$7.7B$188M$53.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense53.51x0.02x-1.57x-2.92x
FSLR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FSLR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FSLR five years ago would be worth $28,755 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,872 for SPWR. Over the past 12 months, CSIQ leads with a +97.1% total return vs SPWR's -42.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FSLR at 6.5% vs SPWR's -42.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…SPWR logoSPWRSunPower Inc.JKS logoJKSJinkoSolar Holdin…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-21.8%-30.4%-38.2%-16.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+65.3%+97.1%-42.4%+37.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+20.9%-52.3%-81.3%-41.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+187.6%-55.4%-81.3%-14.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+324.1%+14.4%-81.3%+40.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+6.5%-21.9%-42.8%-16.5%
FSLR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

FSLR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

FSLR is the less volatile stock with a 1.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CSIQ's 2.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FSLR currently trades 75.0% from its 52-week high vs SPWR's 44.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…SPWR logoSPWRSunPower Inc.JKS logoJKSJinkoSolar Holdin…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.39x2.23x2.13x1.39x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$285.99$34.59$2.27$31.88
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$125.80$8.84$0.81$17.41
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+75.0%+51.1%+44.9%+73.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10064.362.445.951.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.1M2.5M1.7M597K
FSLR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SPWR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: FSLR as "Buy", CSIQ as "Buy", SPWR as "Hold", JKS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1450.0% upside for SPWR (target: $16) vs 2.8% for JKS (target: $24). JKS is the only dividend payer here at 23.53% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricFSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…SPWR logoSPWRSunPower Inc.JKS logoJKSJinkoSolar Holdin…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$264.13$28.88$15.81$24.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts73334522
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+23.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises010
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$37.37
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.1%+5.9%0.0%+0.2%
SPWR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

FSLR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SPWR leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallFirst Solar, Inc. (FSLR)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FSLR vs CSIQ vs SPWR vs JKS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FSLR or CSIQ or SPWR or JKS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) is the stronger pick with 24. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -30. 9% for JinkoSolar Holding Co. , Ltd. (JKS). First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) offers the better valuation at 15. 1x trailing P/E (12. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) a "Buy" — based on 73 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FSLR or CSIQ or SPWR or JKS?

On forward P/E, SunPower Inc.

is actually cheaper at 5. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FSLR or CSIQ or SPWR or JKS?

Over the past 5 years, First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) delivered a total return of +187. 6%, compared to -81. 3% for SunPower Inc. (SPWR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FSLR returned +324. 1% versus SPWR's -81. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FSLR or CSIQ or SPWR or JKS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 39β versus Canadian Solar Inc. 's 2. 23β — meaning CSIQ is approximately 60% more volatile than FSLR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 193% for JinkoSolar Holding Co. , Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FSLR or CSIQ or SPWR or JKS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) is pulling ahead at 24. 1% versus -30. 9% for JinkoSolar Holding Co. , Ltd. (JKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Solar, Inc. grew EPS 18. 2% year-over-year, compared to -1540. 3% for JinkoSolar Holding Co. , Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPWR leads at 65. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FSLR or CSIQ or SPWR or JKS?

First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 3% net margin versus -10. 5% for SunPower Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FSLR leads at 32. 3% versus -11. 1% for JKS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPWR leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FSLR or CSIQ or SPWR or JKS more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, SunPower Inc.

(SPWR) trades at 5. 1x forward P/E versus 12. 0x for First Solar, Inc. — 6. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPWR: 1450. 0% to $15. 81.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FSLR or CSIQ or SPWR or JKS?

In this comparison, JKS (23.

5% yield) pays a dividend. FSLR, CSIQ, SPWR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is FSLR or CSIQ or SPWR or JKS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JinkoSolar Holding Co.

, Ltd. (JKS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (23. 5% yield). SunPower Inc. (SPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JKS: +40. 8%, SPWR: -81. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FSLR and CSIQ and SPWR and JKS?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FSLR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CSIQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPWR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JKS is a small-cap income-oriented stock. JKS pays a dividend while FSLR, CSIQ, SPWR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

FSLR

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CSIQ

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SPWR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 30%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

JKS

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 9.4%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FSLR and CSIQ and SPWR and JKS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FSLR: 23.6% · CSIQ: -20.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.