FSM vs AG

For growth investors, First Majestic Silver Corp.

(AG) is the stronger pick with 128. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 6% for Fortuna Mining Corp. (FSM). Fortuna Mining Corp. (FSM) offers the better valuation at 11. 6x trailing P/E (7. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fortuna Mining Corp. (FSM) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Fortuna Mining Corp.

(FSM) is the cheapest at 11. 6x versus First Majestic Silver Corp. at 61. 1x. On forward P/E, Fortuna Mining Corp. is actually cheaper at 7. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fortuna Mining Corp. wins at 0. 14x versus First Majestic Silver Corp. 's 0. 78x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Fortuna Mining Corp.

(FSM) delivered a total return of +61. 9%, compared to +31. 0% for First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AG returned +128. 5% versus FSM's +73. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fortuna Mining Corp.

(FSM) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 15β versus First Majestic Silver Corp. 's 1. 56β — meaning AG is approximately 36% more volatile than FSM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 15% for Fortuna Mining Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Majestic Silver Corp.

(AG) is pulling ahead at 128. 2% versus -9. 6% for Fortuna Mining Corp. (FSM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Majestic Silver Corp. grew EPS 202. 9% year-over-year, compared to 119. 5% for Fortuna Mining Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AG leads at 26. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Fortuna Mining Corp.

(FSM) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 5% net margin versus 13. 1% for First Majestic Silver Corp. — meaning it keeps 31. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FSM leads at 38. 5% versus 27. 8% for AG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FSM leads at 48. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fortuna Mining Corp. (FSM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 14x versus First Majestic Silver Corp. 's 0. 78x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fortuna Mining Corp. (FSM) trades at 7. 1x forward P/E versus 20. 4x for First Majestic Silver Corp. — 13. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FSM: 34. 1% to $14. 00.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Fortuna Mining Corp.

(FSM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 15)). First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) carries a higher beta of 1. 56 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FSM: +73. 4%, AG: +128. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FSM is a small-cap deep-value stock; AG is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.