Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FSV vs WELL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
FSV vs WELL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | REIT - Healthcare Facilities |
| Market Cap | $5.78B | $150.14B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.52B | $11.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $146M | $1.43B |
| Gross Margin | 31.8% | 39.1% |
| Operating Margin | 6.1% | 4.4% |
| Forward P/E | 20.5x | 78.9x |
| Total Debt | $1.62B | $21.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $180M | $5.03B |
FSV vs WELL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FirstService Corpor… (FSV) | 100 | 134.6 | +34.6% |
| Welltower Inc. (WELL) | 100 | 422.9 | +322.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FSV vs WELL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FSV is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (20.5x vs 78.9x)
- 0.8% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs WELL's 1.3%
- 3.4% ROA vs WELL's 2.3%, ROIC 8.0% vs 0.5%
WELL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.13, yield 1.3%
- Rev growth 35.8%, EPS growth -11.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.7%
- 230.2% 10Y total return vs FSV's 196.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs FSV's 5.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.5x vs 78.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.3% margin vs FSV's 2.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.13 vs FSV's 0.64, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs WELL's 1.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.9% vs FSV's -27.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.4% ROA vs WELL's 2.3%, ROIC 8.0% vs 0.5% |
FSV vs WELL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FSV vs WELL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 2.1x FSV's $5.5B. WELL is the more profitable business, keeping 12.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FSV's 2.6%. On growth, WELL holds the edge at +40.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.5B | $11.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $521M | $2.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $146M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $322M | $2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.8% | +39.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +4.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | +12.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | +21.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.9% | +40.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.7% | +22.5% |
Valuation Metrics
FSV leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 39.8x trailing earnings, FSV trades at a 74% valuation discount to WELL's 154.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FSV's 13.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WELL's 66.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.8B | $150.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.2B | $166.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 39.77x | 154.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.51x | 78.89x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.25x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.85x | 66.76x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.05x | 14.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.09x | 3.37x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.84x | 52.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FSV leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FSV delivers a 8.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $3 for WELL. WELL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FSV's 0.87x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WELL scores 7/9 vs FSV's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.3% | +3.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.4% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.0% | +0.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.0% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.87x | 0.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.4B | $16.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $180M | $5.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.6B | $21.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.62x | 0.26x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WELL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $31,264 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,004 for FSV. Over the past 12 months, WELL leads with a +43.9% total return vs FSV's -27.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WELL at 41.3% vs FSV's -4.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.6% | +15.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -27.0% | +43.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.9% | +182.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.0% | +212.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +196.4% | +230.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.1% | +41.3% |
Risk & Volatility
WELL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WELL is the less volatile stock with a 0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FSV's 0.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WELL currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs FSV's 59.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.64x | 0.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $209.66 | $219.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $124.37 | $142.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +59.9% | +97.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 26.1 | 62.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 181K | 2.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FSV and WELL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FSV as "Buy" and WELL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.5% upside for FSV (target: $203) vs 5.7% for WELL (target: $227). For income investors, WELL offers the higher dividend yield at 1.29% vs FSV's 0.85%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $203.00 | $226.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +1.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 10 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.07 | $2.76 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
WELL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). FSV leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
FSV vs WELL: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FSV or WELL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger pick with 35. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 8% for FirstService Corporation (FSV). FirstService Corporation (FSV) offers the better valuation at 39. 8x trailing P/E (20. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FirstService Corporation (FSV) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FSV or WELL?
On trailing P/E, FirstService Corporation (FSV) is the cheapest at 39.
8x versus Welltower Inc. at 154. 2x. On forward P/E, FirstService Corporation is actually cheaper at 20. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FSV or WELL?
Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) delivered a total return of +212. 6%, compared to -20. 0% for FirstService Corporation (FSV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WELL returned +230. 2% versus FSV's +196. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FSV or WELL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 13β versus FirstService Corporation's 0. 64β — meaning FSV is approximately 379% more volatile than WELL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Welltower Inc. (WELL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 87% for FirstService Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FSV or WELL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is pulling ahead at 35. 8% versus 5. 8% for FirstService Corporation (FSV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FirstService Corporation grew EPS 6. 4% year-over-year, compared to -11. 5% for Welltower Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WELL leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FSV or WELL?
Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 8% net margin versus 2. 6% for FirstService Corporation — meaning it keeps 8. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FSV leads at 6. 1% versus 3. 3% for WELL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WELL leads at 39. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FSV or WELL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, FirstService Corporation (FSV) trades at 20.
5x forward P/E versus 78. 9x for Welltower Inc. — 58. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FSV: 61. 5% to $203. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FSV or WELL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Welltower Inc. (WELL) offers the highest yield at 1. 3%, versus 0. 8% for FirstService Corporation (FSV).
09Is FSV or WELL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 13), 1. 3% yield, +230. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WELL: +230. 2%, FSV: +196. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FSV and WELL?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FSV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.