Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FSV vs WELL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FSV
FirstService Corporation

Real Estate - Services

Real EstateNASDAQ • CA
Market Cap$5.78B
5Y Perf.+34.6%
WELL
Welltower Inc.

REIT - Healthcare Facilities

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$150.14B
5Y Perf.+322.9%

FSV vs WELL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FSV logoFSV
WELL logoWELL
IndustryReal Estate - ServicesREIT - Healthcare Facilities
Market Cap$5.78B$150.14B
Revenue (TTM)$5.52B$11.63B
Net Income (TTM)$146M$1.43B
Gross Margin31.8%39.1%
Operating Margin6.1%4.4%
Forward P/E20.5x78.9x
Total Debt$1.62B$21.38B
Cash & Equiv.$180M$5.03B

FSV vs WELLLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FSV
WELL
StockMay 20May 26Return
FirstService Corpor… (FSV)100134.6+34.6%
Welltower Inc. (WELL)100422.9+322.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FSV vs WELL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: WELL leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. FirstService Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FSV
FirstService Corporation
The Real Estate Income Play

FSV is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.

  • Lower P/E (20.5x vs 78.9x)
  • 0.8% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs WELL's 1.3%
  • 3.4% ROA vs WELL's 2.3%, ROIC 8.0% vs 0.5%
Best for: value and dividends
WELL
Welltower Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

WELL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.13, yield 1.3%
  • Rev growth 35.8%, EPS growth -11.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.7%
  • 230.2% 10Y total return vs FSV's 196.4%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthWELL logoWELL35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs FSV's 5.8%
ValueFSV logoFSVLower P/E (20.5x vs 78.9x)
Quality / MarginsWELL logoWELL12.3% margin vs FSV's 2.6%
Stability / SafetyWELL logoWELLBeta 0.13 vs FSV's 0.64, lower leverage
DividendsFSV logoFSV0.8% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs WELL's 1.3%
Momentum (1Y)WELL logoWELL+43.9% vs FSV's -27.0%
Efficiency (ROA)FSV logoFSV3.4% ROA vs WELL's 2.3%, ROIC 8.0% vs 0.5%

FSV vs WELL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FSVFirstService Corporation
FY 2025
FirstService Brands Segment
58.4%$3.2B
FirstService Residential Segment
41.6%$2.3B
WELLWelltower Inc.
FY 2025
Senior Housing - Operating
81.1%$8.5B
Triple Net
11.4%$1.2B
Outpatient Medical
7.5%$782M

FSV vs WELL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLWELLLAGGINGFSV

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

WELL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

WELL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 2.1x FSV's $5.5B. WELL is the more profitable business, keeping 12.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FSV's 2.6%. On growth, WELL holds the edge at +40.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFSV logoFSVFirstService Corp…WELL logoWELLWelltower Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$5.5B$11.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$521M$2.8B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$146M$1.4B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$322M$2.5B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+31.8%+39.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+6.1%+4.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+2.6%+12.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+5.8%+21.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.9%+40.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+19.7%+22.5%
WELL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FSV leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 39.8x trailing earnings, FSV trades at a 74% valuation discount to WELL's 154.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FSV's 13.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WELL's 66.8x.

MetricFSV logoFSVFirstService Corp…WELL logoWELLWelltower Inc.
Market CapShares × price$5.8B$150.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$7.2B$166.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS39.77x154.17x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.20.51x78.89x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate4.25x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.85x66.76x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.05x14.08x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.09x3.37x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF17.84x52.72x
FSV leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FSV leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

FSV delivers a 8.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $3 for WELL. WELL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FSV's 0.87x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WELL scores 7/9 vs FSV's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFSV logoFSVFirstService Corp…WELL logoWELLWelltower Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+8.3%+3.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.4%+2.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+8.0%+0.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+10.0%+0.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–957
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.87x0.49x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.4B$16.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$180M$5.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.6B$21.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense4.62x0.26x
FSV leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

WELL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $31,264 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,004 for FSV. Over the past 12 months, WELL leads with a +43.9% total return vs FSV's -27.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WELL at 41.3% vs FSV's -4.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFSV logoFSVFirstService Corp…WELL logoWELLWelltower Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-16.6%+15.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-27.0%+43.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-11.9%+182.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-20.0%+212.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+196.4%+230.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-4.1%+41.3%
WELL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

WELL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

WELL is the less volatile stock with a 0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FSV's 0.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WELL currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs FSV's 59.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFSV logoFSVFirstService Corp…WELL logoWELLWelltower Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.64x0.13x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$209.66$219.59
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$124.37$142.65
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+59.9%+97.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10026.162.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded181K2.6M
WELL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — FSV and WELL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates FSV as "Buy" and WELL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.5% upside for FSV (target: $203) vs 5.7% for WELL (target: $227). For income investors, WELL offers the higher dividend yield at 1.29% vs FSV's 0.85%.

MetricFSV logoFSVFirstService Corp…WELL logoWELLWelltower Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$203.00$226.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts934
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.8%+1.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises102
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.07$2.76
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — FSV and WELL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

WELL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). FSV leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.

Best OverallWelltower Inc. (WELL)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FSV vs WELL: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FSV or WELL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Welltower Inc.

(WELL) is the stronger pick with 35. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 8% for FirstService Corporation (FSV). FirstService Corporation (FSV) offers the better valuation at 39. 8x trailing P/E (20. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FirstService Corporation (FSV) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FSV or WELL?

On trailing P/E, FirstService Corporation (FSV) is the cheapest at 39.

8x versus Welltower Inc. at 154. 2x. On forward P/E, FirstService Corporation is actually cheaper at 20. 5x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FSV or WELL?

Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.

(WELL) delivered a total return of +212. 6%, compared to -20. 0% for FirstService Corporation (FSV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WELL returned +230. 2% versus FSV's +196. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FSV or WELL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Welltower Inc.

(WELL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 13β versus FirstService Corporation's 0. 64β — meaning FSV is approximately 379% more volatile than WELL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Welltower Inc. (WELL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 87% for FirstService Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FSV or WELL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Welltower Inc.

(WELL) is pulling ahead at 35. 8% versus 5. 8% for FirstService Corporation (FSV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FirstService Corporation grew EPS 6. 4% year-over-year, compared to -11. 5% for Welltower Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WELL leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FSV or WELL?

Welltower Inc.

(WELL) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 8% net margin versus 2. 6% for FirstService Corporation — meaning it keeps 8. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FSV leads at 6. 1% versus 3. 3% for WELL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WELL leads at 39. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FSV or WELL more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, FirstService Corporation (FSV) trades at 20.

5x forward P/E versus 78. 9x for Welltower Inc. — 58. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FSV: 61. 5% to $203. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FSV or WELL?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Welltower Inc. (WELL) offers the highest yield at 1. 3%, versus 0. 8% for FirstService Corporation (FSV).

09

Is FSV or WELL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Welltower Inc.

(WELL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 13), 1. 3% yield, +230. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WELL: +230. 2%, FSV: +196. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FSV and WELL?

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FSV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

FSV

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 19%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WELL

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 20%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FSV and WELL on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FSV: 2.9% · WELL: 40.3%)
Net Margin>
%
(FSV: 2.6% · WELL: 12.3%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(FSV: 39.8x · WELL: 154.2x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.