Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FTI vs WTTR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Water
FTI vs WTTR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Regulated Water |
| Market Cap | $28.42B | $1.89B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10.18B | $1.40B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.08B | $22M |
| Gross Margin | 20.1% | 18.2% |
| Operating Margin | 14.4% | 2.3% |
| Forward P/E | 23.8x | 35.1x |
| Total Debt | $2.02B | $374M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.03B | $18M |
FTI vs WTTR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TechnipFMC plc (FTI) | 100 | 1157.6 | +1057.6% |
| Select Water Soluti… (WTTR) | 100 | 282.8 | +182.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FTI vs WTTR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FTI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 9.4%, EPS growth 20.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.0%
- 221.3% 10Y total return vs WTTR's 26.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.59, Low D/E 59.2%, current ratio 1.13x
WTTR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.09, yield 1.9%
- Beta 1.09, yield 1.9%, current ratio 1.57x
- 1.9% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs FTI's 0.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.4% revenue growth vs WTTR's -3.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (23.8x vs 35.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.6% margin vs WTTR's 1.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.59 vs WTTR's 1.09 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs FTI's 0.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +144.6% vs WTTR's +134.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.7% ROA vs WTTR's 1.3%, ROIC 17.6% vs 2.3% |
FTI vs WTTR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FTI vs WTTR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FTI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FTI is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.2B annually — 7.3x WTTR's $1.4B. FTI is the more profitable business, keeping 10.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WTTR's 1.5%. On growth, FTI holds the edge at +11.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10.2B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.9B | $217M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | $22M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.3B | -$95M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +20.1% | +18.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.4% | +2.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.6% | +1.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | -6.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.2% | -2.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +93.9% | -4.4% |
Valuation Metrics
WTTR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.9x trailing earnings, FTI trades at a 63% valuation discount to WTTR's 84.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WTTR's 10.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FTI's 21.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $28.4B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $29.4B | $2.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 30.89x | 84.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.77x | 35.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.02x | 10.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.86x | 1.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.74x | 1.88x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.63x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FTI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FTI delivers a 32.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $2 for WTTR. WTTR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.40x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FTI's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FTI scores 7/9 vs WTTR's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +32.2% | +2.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.7% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.6% | +2.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +18.8% | +2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.59x | 0.40x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $984M | $356M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.0B | $18M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.0B | $374M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 22.62x | 1.54x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FTI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FTI five years ago would be worth $83,438 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $25,837 for WTTR. Over the past 12 months, FTI leads with a +144.6% total return vs WTTR's +134.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FTI at 72.4% vs WTTR's 33.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +50.3% | +52.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +144.6% | +134.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +412.1% | +135.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +734.4% | +158.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +221.3% | +26.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +72.4% | +33.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FTI and WTTR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FTI is the less volatile stock with a 0.59 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WTTR's 1.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.55x | 1.07x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $77.78 | $17.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $28.87 | $7.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.3% | +93.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.9 | 69.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.8M | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
WTTR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FTI as "Buy" and WTTR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.9% upside for WTTR (target: $20) vs -1.7% for FTI (target: $70). For income investors, WTTR offers the higher dividend yield at 1.93% vs FTI's 0.28%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $69.86 | $19.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 50 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.20 | $0.32 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.2% | +0.4% |
FTI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WTTR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
FTI vs WTTR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FTI or WTTR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TechnipFMC plc (FTI) is the stronger pick with 9.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 1% for Select Water Solutions, Inc. (WTTR). TechnipFMC plc (FTI) offers the better valuation at 30. 9x trailing P/E (23. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TechnipFMC plc (FTI) a "Buy" — based on 50 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FTI or WTTR?
On trailing P/E, TechnipFMC plc (FTI) is the cheapest at 30.
9x versus Select Water Solutions, Inc. at 84. 1x. On forward P/E, TechnipFMC plc is actually cheaper at 23. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FTI or WTTR?
Over the past 5 years, TechnipFMC plc (FTI) delivered a total return of +734.
4%, compared to +158. 4% for Select Water Solutions, Inc. (WTTR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FTI returned +217. 4% versus WTTR's +26. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FTI or WTTR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TechnipFMC plc (FTI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
55β versus Select Water Solutions, Inc. 's 1. 07β — meaning WTTR is approximately 93% more volatile than FTI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Select Water Solutions, Inc. (WTTR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 40% versus 59% for TechnipFMC plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FTI or WTTR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TechnipFMC plc (FTI) is pulling ahead at 9.
4% versus -3. 1% for Select Water Solutions, Inc. (WTTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TechnipFMC plc grew EPS 20. 4% year-over-year, compared to -33. 3% for Select Water Solutions, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FTI leads at 14. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FTI or WTTR?
TechnipFMC plc (FTI) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
7% net margin versus 1. 5% for Select Water Solutions, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FTI leads at 9. 6% versus 2. 5% for WTTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FTI leads at 17. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FTI or WTTR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TechnipFMC plc (FTI) trades at 23.
8x forward P/E versus 35. 1x for Select Water Solutions, Inc. — 11. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WTTR: 16. 9% to $19. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — FTI or WTTR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Select Water Solutions, Inc. (WTTR) offers the highest yield at 1. 9%, versus 0. 3% for TechnipFMC plc (FTI).
09Is FTI or WTTR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TechnipFMC plc (FTI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
55), +217. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FTI: +217. 4%, WTTR: +26. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FTI and WTTR?
These companies operate in different sectors (FTI (Energy) and WTTR (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
WTTR pays a dividend while FTI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.