Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FTK vs KLXE vs NINE vs PUMP vs LBRT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FTK
Flotek Industries, Inc.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$488M
5Y Perf.+175.5%
KLXE
KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$58M
5Y Perf.-55.9%
NINE
Nine Energy Service, Inc.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$427M
5Y Perf.+385.2%
PUMP
ProPetro Holding Corp.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.91B
5Y Perf.+214.1%
LBRT
Liberty Energy Inc.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.13B
5Y Perf.+515.0%

FTK vs KLXE vs NINE vs PUMP vs LBRT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FTK logoFTK
KLXE logoKLXE
NINE logoNINE
PUMP logoPUMP
LBRT logoLBRT
IndustryOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$488M$58M$427M$1.91B$5.13B
Revenue (TTM)$252M$637M$571M$1.18B$4.05B
Net Income (TTM)$30M$-77M$-41M$-12M$150M
Gross Margin24.5%21.2%11.5%8.3%10.7%
Operating Margin10.3%10.2%2.0%-1.1%1.5%
Forward P/E23.8x1993.6x3480.2x
Total Debt$50M$318M$383M$249M$873M
Cash & Equiv.$6M$6M$18M$91M$28M

FTK vs KLXE vs NINE vs PUMP vs LBRTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FTK
KLXE
NINE
PUMP
LBRT
StockMay 20May 26Return
Flotek Industries, … (FTK)100275.5+175.5%
KLX Energy Services… (KLXE)10044.1-55.9%
Nine Energy Service… (NINE)100485.2+385.2%
ProPetro Holding Co… (PUMP)100314.1+214.1%
Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT)100615.0+515.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FTK vs KLXE vs NINE vs PUMP vs LBRT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FTK leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. NINE and LBRT also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FTK
Flotek Industries, Inc.
The Growth Play

FTK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 26.9%, EPS growth 147.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.4%
  • 26.9% revenue growth vs NINE's -100.0%
  • Lower P/E (23.8x vs 3480.2x)
  • 11.8% margin vs KLXE's -12.1%
Best for: growth exposure
KLXE
KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc.
The Defensive Choice

KLXE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability is your priority.

  • Beta 0.76 vs NINE's 3.21
Best for: stability
NINE
Nine Energy Service, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

NINE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +15.1% vs FTK's +59.6%
Best for: momentum
PUMP
ProPetro Holding Corp.
The Defensive Pick

PUMP is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 30.0%, current ratio 1.29x
  • Beta 1.12, current ratio 1.29x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
LBRT
Liberty Energy Inc.
The Income Pick

LBRT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.31, yield 1.0%
  • 94.1% 10Y total return vs NINE's -62.3%
  • 1.0% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFTK logoFTK26.9% revenue growth vs NINE's -100.0%
ValueFTK logoFTKLower P/E (23.8x vs 3480.2x)
Quality / MarginsFTK logoFTK11.8% margin vs KLXE's -12.1%
Stability / SafetyKLXE logoKLXEBeta 0.76 vs NINE's 3.21
DividendsLBRT logoLBRT1.0% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)NINE logoNINE+15.1% vs FTK's +59.6%
Efficiency (ROA)FTK logoFTK14.3% ROA vs KLXE's -21.3%, ROIC 15.1% vs -9.4%

FTK vs KLXE vs NINE vs PUMP vs LBRT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FTKFlotek Industries, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
90.0%$213M
Rental
6.8%$16M
Service
3.2%$8M
KLXEKLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc.
FY 2023
Rocky Mountains
100.0%$271M
NINENine Energy Service, Inc.
FY 2025
Service Revenue
38.4%$431M
Cement
18.8%$211M
Tool Revenue
11.6%$131M
Tools
11.6%$131M
Wireline
10.3%$116M
Coiled Tubing
9.3%$104M
PUMPProPetro Holding Corp.
FY 2025
Power Generation
100.0%$2M
LBRTLiberty Energy Inc.
FY 2025
Service, Other
100.0%$600,000

FTK vs KLXE vs NINE vs PUMP vs LBRT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFTKLAGGINGPUMP

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FTK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

LBRT is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.0B annually — 16.1x FTK's $252M. FTK is the more profitable business, keeping 11.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KLXE's -12.1%. On growth, FTK holds the edge at +26.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFTK logoFTKFlotek Industries…KLXE logoKLXEKLX Energy Servic…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …LBRT logoLBRTLiberty Energy In…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$252M$637M$571M$1.2B$4.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$37M$160M$61M$154M$549M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$30M-$77M-$41M-$12M$150M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$3M-$42M-$7M-$11M-$193M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+24.5%+21.2%+11.5%+8.3%+10.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+10.3%+10.2%+2.0%-1.1%+1.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+11.8%-12.1%-7.2%-1.1%+3.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-1.2%-6.5%-1.2%-0.9%-4.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+26.5%-5.3%-4.4%-24.7%+4.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-29.4%+13.3%-34.6%-134.2%+16.7%
FTK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — KLXE and PUMP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 19.3x trailing earnings, FTK trades at a 99% valuation discount to PUMP's 1993.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KLXE's 5.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NINE's 337.0x.

MetricFTK logoFTKFlotek Industries…KLXE logoKLXEKLX Energy Servic…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …LBRT logoLBRTLiberty Energy In…
Market CapShares × price$488M$58M$427M$1.9B$5.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$533M$371M$791M$2.1B$6.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS19.29x-0.79x-7.88x1993.59x35.58x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.23.83x3480.22x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple14.68x5.71x337.01x10.67x10.28x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.06x0.09x1.50x1.28x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share5.18x1.98x2.53x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF93.51x44.88x363.85x
Evenly matched — KLXE and PUMP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FTK leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

FTK delivers a 28.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $-1 for PUMP. PUMP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FTK's 0.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PUMP scores 5/9 vs NINE's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricFTK logoFTKFlotek Industries…KLXE logoKLXEKLX Energy Servic…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …LBRT logoLBRTLiberty Energy In…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+28.8%-1.4%+7.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+14.3%-21.3%-11.5%-1.0%+4.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+15.1%-9.4%+0.7%+1.4%+2.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+20.2%-11.4%+0.9%+1.8%+3.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–943154
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.44x0.30x0.42x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$44M$313M$364M$158M$846M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$6M$6M$18M$91M$28M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$50M$318M$383M$249M$873M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense5.96x-0.67x0.24x-0.86x5.24x
FTK leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NINE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NINE five years ago would be worth $48,522 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,717 for KLXE. Over the past 12 months, NINE leads with a +1505.8% total return vs FTK's +59.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FTK at 63.3% vs KLXE's -31.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFTK logoFTKFlotek Industries…KLXE logoKLXEKLX Energy Servic…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …LBRT logoLBRTLiberty Energy In…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-5.0%+68.0%+2682.5%+58.4%+68.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+59.6%+65.5%+1505.8%+201.4%+186.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+335.5%-68.3%+150.0%+132.8%+166.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+63.6%-72.8%+385.2%+41.6%+132.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-74.7%-97.6%-62.3%+7.2%+94.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+63.3%-31.8%+35.7%+32.5%+38.6%
NINE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — KLXE and NINE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KLXE is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NINE's 3.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NINE currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs FTK's 79.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFTK logoFTKFlotek Industries…KLXE logoKLXEKLX Energy Servic…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …LBRT logoLBRTLiberty Energy In…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.73x0.76x3.21x1.12x1.31x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$20.41$4.06$10.23$18.50$34.41
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$7.75$1.46$0.00$4.51$9.90
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+79.4%+80.3%+96.3%+84.1%+92.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10047.556.982.951.958.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded264K307K125K3.5M4.2M
Evenly matched — KLXE and NINE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

LBRT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: FTK as "Buy", NINE as "Hold", PUMP as "Buy", LBRT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 82.7% upside for NINE (target: $18) vs -5.1% for PUMP (target: $15). LBRT is the only dividend payer here at 1.04% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricFTK logoFTKFlotek Industries…KLXE logoKLXEKLX Energy Servic…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …LBRT logoLBRTLiberty Energy In…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$25.00$18.00$14.75$34.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1293019
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises14
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.33
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.5%
LBRT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

FTK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NINE leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallFlotek Industries, Inc. (FTK)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FTK vs KLXE vs NINE vs PUMP vs LBRT: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FTK or KLXE or NINE or PUMP or LBRT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Flotek Industries, Inc.

(FTK) is the stronger pick with 26. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). Flotek Industries, Inc. (FTK) offers the better valuation at 19. 3x trailing P/E (23. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Flotek Industries, Inc. (FTK) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FTK or KLXE or NINE or PUMP or LBRT?

On trailing P/E, Flotek Industries, Inc.

(FTK) is the cheapest at 19. 3x versus ProPetro Holding Corp. at 1993. 6x. On forward P/E, Flotek Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 23. 8x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FTK or KLXE or NINE or PUMP or LBRT?

Over the past 5 years, Nine Energy Service, Inc.

(NINE) delivered a total return of +385. 2%, compared to -72. 8% for KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. (KLXE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LBRT returned +94. 1% versus KLXE's -97. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FTK or KLXE or NINE or PUMP or LBRT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc.

(KLXE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus Nine Energy Service, Inc. 's 3. 21β — meaning NINE is approximately 321% more volatile than KLXE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 44% for Flotek Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FTK or KLXE or NINE or PUMP or LBRT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flotek Industries, Inc.

(FTK) is pulling ahead at 26. 9% versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flotek Industries, Inc. grew EPS 147. 1% year-over-year, compared to -52. 4% for Liberty Energy Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FTK leads at 20. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FTK or KLXE or NINE or PUMP or LBRT?

Flotek Industries, Inc.

(FTK) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 9% net margin versus -12. 1% for KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FTK leads at 11. 9% versus -4. 8% for KLXE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FTK leads at 24. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FTK or KLXE or NINE or PUMP or LBRT more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Flotek Industries, Inc.

(FTK) trades at 23. 8x forward P/E versus 3480. 2x for Liberty Energy Inc. — 3456. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NINE: 82. 7% to $18. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FTK or KLXE or NINE or PUMP or LBRT?

In this comparison, LBRT (1.

0% yield) pays a dividend. FTK, KLXE, NINE, PUMP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is FTK or KLXE or NINE or PUMP or LBRT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Liberty Energy Inc.

(LBRT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 0% yield). Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) carries a higher beta of 3. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LBRT: +94. 1%, NINE: -62. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FTK and KLXE and NINE and PUMP and LBRT?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FTK is a small-cap high-growth stock; KLXE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NINE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PUMP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LBRT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. LBRT pays a dividend while FTK, KLXE, NINE, PUMP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

FTK

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KLXE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NINE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PUMP

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LBRT

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FTK and KLXE and NINE and PUMP and LBRT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FTK: 26.5% · KLXE: -5.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.