Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FTK vs KLXE vs NINE vs PUMP vs LBRT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
FTK vs KLXE vs NINE vs PUMP vs LBRT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $488M | $58M | $427M | $1.91B | $5.13B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $252M | $637M | $571M | $1.18B | $4.05B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $30M | $-77M | $-41M | $-12M | $150M |
| Gross Margin | 24.5% | 21.2% | 11.5% | 8.3% | 10.7% |
| Operating Margin | 10.3% | 10.2% | 2.0% | -1.1% | 1.5% |
| Forward P/E | 23.8x | — | — | 1993.6x | 3480.2x |
| Total Debt | $50M | $318M | $383M | $249M | $873M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $6M | $18M | $91M | $28M |
FTK vs KLXE vs NINE vs PUMP vs LBRT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flotek Industries, … (FTK) | 100 | 275.5 | +175.5% |
| KLX Energy Services… (KLXE) | 100 | 44.1 | -55.9% |
| Nine Energy Service… (NINE) | 100 | 485.2 | +385.2% |
| ProPetro Holding Co… (PUMP) | 100 | 314.1 | +214.1% |
| Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT) | 100 | 615.0 | +515.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FTK vs KLXE vs NINE vs PUMP vs LBRT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FTK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 26.9%, EPS growth 147.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.4%
- 26.9% revenue growth vs NINE's -100.0%
- Lower P/E (23.8x vs 3480.2x)
- 11.8% margin vs KLXE's -12.1%
KLXE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability is your priority.
- Beta 0.76 vs NINE's 3.21
NINE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +15.1% vs FTK's +59.6%
PUMP is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 30.0%, current ratio 1.29x
- Beta 1.12, current ratio 1.29x
LBRT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.31, yield 1.0%
- 94.1% 10Y total return vs NINE's -62.3%
- 1.0% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.9% revenue growth vs NINE's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (23.8x vs 3480.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.8% margin vs KLXE's -12.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs NINE's 3.21 | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +15.1% vs FTK's +59.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.3% ROA vs KLXE's -21.3%, ROIC 15.1% vs -9.4% |
FTK vs KLXE vs NINE vs PUMP vs LBRT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FTK vs KLXE vs NINE vs PUMP vs LBRT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FTK leads in 2 of 6 categories
NINE leads 1 • LBRT leads 1 • KLXE leads 0 • PUMP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FTK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LBRT is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.0B annually — 16.1x FTK's $252M. FTK is the more profitable business, keeping 11.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KLXE's -12.1%. On growth, FTK holds the edge at +26.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $252M | $637M | $571M | $1.2B | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $37M | $160M | $61M | $154M | $549M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $30M | -$77M | -$41M | -$12M | $150M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$42M | -$7M | -$11M | -$193M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.5% | +21.2% | +11.5% | +8.3% | +10.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.3% | +10.2% | +2.0% | -1.1% | +1.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | -12.1% | -7.2% | -1.1% | +3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.2% | -6.5% | -1.2% | -0.9% | -4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.5% | -5.3% | -4.4% | -24.7% | +4.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -29.4% | +13.3% | -34.6% | -134.2% | +16.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — KLXE and PUMP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.3x trailing earnings, FTK trades at a 99% valuation discount to PUMP's 1993.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KLXE's 5.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NINE's 337.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $488M | $58M | $427M | $1.9B | $5.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $533M | $371M | $791M | $2.1B | $6.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.29x | -0.79x | -7.88x | 1993.59x | 35.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.83x | — | — | — | 3480.22x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.68x | 5.71x | 337.01x | 10.67x | 10.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.06x | 0.09x | — | 1.50x | 1.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.18x | — | — | 1.98x | 2.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 93.51x | — | — | 44.88x | 363.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FTK leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FTK delivers a 28.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $-1 for PUMP. PUMP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FTK's 0.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PUMP scores 5/9 vs NINE's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +28.8% | — | — | -1.4% | +7.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +14.3% | -21.3% | -11.5% | -1.0% | +4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.1% | -9.4% | +0.7% | +1.4% | +2.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +20.2% | -11.4% | +0.9% | +1.8% | +3.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.44x | — | — | 0.30x | 0.42x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $44M | $313M | $364M | $158M | $846M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $6M | $18M | $91M | $28M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $50M | $318M | $383M | $249M | $873M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.96x | -0.67x | 0.24x | -0.86x | 5.24x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NINE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NINE five years ago would be worth $48,522 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,717 for KLXE. Over the past 12 months, NINE leads with a +1505.8% total return vs FTK's +59.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FTK at 63.3% vs KLXE's -31.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.0% | +68.0% | +2682.5% | +58.4% | +68.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +59.6% | +65.5% | +1505.8% | +201.4% | +186.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +335.5% | -68.3% | +150.0% | +132.8% | +166.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.6% | -72.8% | +385.2% | +41.6% | +132.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.7% | -97.6% | -62.3% | +7.2% | +94.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +63.3% | -31.8% | +35.7% | +32.5% | +38.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KLXE and NINE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KLXE is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NINE's 3.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NINE currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs FTK's 79.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.73x | 0.76x | 3.21x | 1.12x | 1.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.41 | $4.06 | $10.23 | $18.50 | $34.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.75 | $1.46 | $0.00 | $4.51 | $9.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.4% | +80.3% | +96.3% | +84.1% | +92.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.5 | 56.9 | 82.9 | 51.9 | 58.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 264K | 307K | 125K | 3.5M | 4.2M |
Analyst Outlook
LBRT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FTK as "Buy", NINE as "Hold", PUMP as "Buy", LBRT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 82.7% upside for NINE (target: $18) vs -5.1% for PUMP (target: $15). LBRT is the only dividend payer here at 1.04% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.00 | — | $18.00 | $14.75 | $34.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | — | 9 | 30 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.33 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.5% |
FTK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NINE leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
FTK vs KLXE vs NINE vs PUMP vs LBRT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FTK or KLXE or NINE or PUMP or LBRT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Flotek Industries, Inc.
(FTK) is the stronger pick with 26. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). Flotek Industries, Inc. (FTK) offers the better valuation at 19. 3x trailing P/E (23. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Flotek Industries, Inc. (FTK) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FTK or KLXE or NINE or PUMP or LBRT?
On trailing P/E, Flotek Industries, Inc.
(FTK) is the cheapest at 19. 3x versus ProPetro Holding Corp. at 1993. 6x. On forward P/E, Flotek Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 23. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FTK or KLXE or NINE or PUMP or LBRT?
Over the past 5 years, Nine Energy Service, Inc.
(NINE) delivered a total return of +385. 2%, compared to -72. 8% for KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. (KLXE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LBRT returned +94. 1% versus KLXE's -97. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FTK or KLXE or NINE or PUMP or LBRT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc.
(KLXE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus Nine Energy Service, Inc. 's 3. 21β — meaning NINE is approximately 321% more volatile than KLXE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 44% for Flotek Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FTK or KLXE or NINE or PUMP or LBRT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flotek Industries, Inc.
(FTK) is pulling ahead at 26. 9% versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flotek Industries, Inc. grew EPS 147. 1% year-over-year, compared to -52. 4% for Liberty Energy Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FTK leads at 20. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FTK or KLXE or NINE or PUMP or LBRT?
Flotek Industries, Inc.
(FTK) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 9% net margin versus -12. 1% for KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FTK leads at 11. 9% versus -4. 8% for KLXE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FTK leads at 24. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FTK or KLXE or NINE or PUMP or LBRT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Flotek Industries, Inc.
(FTK) trades at 23. 8x forward P/E versus 3480. 2x for Liberty Energy Inc. — 3456. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NINE: 82. 7% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FTK or KLXE or NINE or PUMP or LBRT?
In this comparison, LBRT (1.
0% yield) pays a dividend. FTK, KLXE, NINE, PUMP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FTK or KLXE or NINE or PUMP or LBRT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Liberty Energy Inc.
(LBRT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 0% yield). Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) carries a higher beta of 3. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LBRT: +94. 1%, NINE: -62. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FTK and KLXE and NINE and PUMP and LBRT?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FTK is a small-cap high-growth stock; KLXE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NINE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PUMP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LBRT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. LBRT pays a dividend while FTK, KLXE, NINE, PUMP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.