Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FTK vs NINE vs PUMP vs NCSM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
FTK vs NINE vs PUMP vs NCSM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $488M | $427M | $1.91B | $105M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $252M | $571M | $1.18B | $180M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $30M | $-41M | $-12M | $19M |
| Gross Margin | 24.5% | 11.5% | 8.3% | 36.7% |
| Operating Margin | 10.3% | 2.0% | -1.1% | 5.2% |
| Forward P/E | 24.5x | — | 1993.6x | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $50M | $383M | $249M | $13M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $18M | $91M | $37M |
FTK vs NINE vs PUMP vs NCSM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flotek Industries, … (FTK) | 100 | 271.6 | +171.6% |
| Nine Energy Service… (NINE) | 100 | 493.1 | +393.1% |
| ProPetro Holding Co… (PUMP) | 100 | 316.8 | +216.8% |
| NCS Multistage Hold… (NCSM) | 100 | 388.1 | +288.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FTK vs NINE vs PUMP vs NCSM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FTK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 26.9%, EPS growth 147.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.4%
- 26.9% revenue growth vs NINE's -100.0%
- 11.8% margin vs NINE's -7.2%
- 14.3% ROA vs NINE's -11.5%, ROIC 15.1% vs 0.7%
NINE is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -62.3% 10Y total return vs PUMP's 7.2%
- +15.1% vs NCSM's +28.1%
PUMP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NCSM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 0.28
- Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 9.0%, current ratio 4.27x
- Beta 0.28, current ratio 4.27x
- Lower P/E (11.8x vs 1993.6x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.9% revenue growth vs NINE's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.8x vs 1993.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.8% margin vs NINE's -7.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs NINE's 3.21 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +15.1% vs NCSM's +28.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.3% ROA vs NINE's -11.5%, ROIC 15.1% vs 0.7% |
FTK vs NINE vs PUMP vs NCSM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FTK vs NINE vs PUMP vs NCSM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NCSM leads in 2 of 6 categories
FTK leads 1 • NINE leads 1 • PUMP leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FTK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PUMP is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 6.6x NCSM's $180M. FTK is the more profitable business, keeping 11.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NINE's -7.2%. On growth, FTK holds the edge at +26.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $252M | $571M | $1.2B | $180M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $37M | $61M | $154M | $15M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $30M | -$41M | -$12M | $19M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$7M | -$11M | $24M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.5% | +11.5% | +8.3% | +36.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.3% | +2.0% | -1.1% | +5.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | -7.2% | -1.1% | +10.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.2% | -1.2% | -0.9% | +13.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.5% | -4.4% | -24.7% | -8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -29.4% | -34.6% | -134.2% | -109.3% |
Valuation Metrics
NCSM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.6x trailing earnings, NCSM trades at a 100% valuation discount to PUMP's 1993.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NCSM's 4.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NINE's 337.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $488M | $427M | $1.9B | $105M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $533M | $791M | $2.1B | $81M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.29x | -7.88x | 1993.59x | 4.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.46x | — | — | 11.82x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.68x | 337.01x | 10.67x | 4.57x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.06x | — | 1.50x | 0.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.18x | — | 1.98x | 0.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 93.51x | — | 44.88x | 4.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NCSM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FTK delivers a 28.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $-1 for PUMP. NCSM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FTK's 0.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NCSM scores 6/9 vs NINE's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +28.8% | — | -1.4% | +14.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +14.3% | -11.5% | -1.0% | +11.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.1% | +0.7% | +1.4% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +20.2% | +0.9% | +1.8% | +8.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.44x | — | 0.30x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $44M | $364M | $158M | -$24M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $18M | $91M | $37M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $50M | $383M | $249M | $13M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.96x | 0.24x | -0.86x | 28.21x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NINE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NINE five years ago would be worth $48,522 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,162 for PUMP. Over the past 12 months, NINE leads with a +1505.8% total return vs NCSM's +28.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FTK at 63.3% vs NCSM's 27.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.0% | +2682.5% | +58.4% | +0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +59.6% | +1505.8% | +201.4% | +28.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +335.5% | +150.0% | +132.8% | +104.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.6% | +385.2% | +41.6% | +51.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.7% | -62.3% | +7.2% | -90.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +63.3% | +35.7% | +32.5% | +27.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NINE and NCSM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NCSM is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NINE's 3.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NINE currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs NCSM's 45.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.57x | 3.04x | 1.02x | 0.16x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.41 | $10.23 | $18.50 | $87.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.75 | $0.00 | $4.51 | $28.64 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.4% | +96.3% | +84.1% | +45.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.5 | 82.9 | 51.9 | 27.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 264K | 125K | 3.5M | 38K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FTK as "Buy", NINE as "Hold", PUMP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 82.7% upside for NINE (target: $18) vs -5.1% for PUMP (target: $15).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.00 | $18.00 | $14.75 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 9 | 30 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.3% |
NCSM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). FTK leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
FTK vs NINE vs PUMP vs NCSM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FTK or NINE or PUMP or NCSM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Flotek Industries, Inc.
(FTK) is the stronger pick with 26. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. (NCSM) offers the better valuation at 4. 6x trailing P/E (11. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Flotek Industries, Inc. (FTK) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FTK or NINE or PUMP or NCSM?
On trailing P/E, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) is the cheapest at 4. 6x versus ProPetro Holding Corp. at 1993. 6x. On forward P/E, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FTK or NINE or PUMP or NCSM?
Over the past 5 years, Nine Energy Service, Inc.
(NINE) delivered a total return of +385. 2%, compared to +41. 6% for ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PUMP returned +8. 1% versus NCSM's -89. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FTK or NINE or PUMP or NCSM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 16β versus Nine Energy Service, Inc. 's 3. 04β — meaning NINE is approximately 1782% more volatile than NCSM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. (NCSM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 44% for Flotek Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FTK or NINE or PUMP or NCSM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flotek Industries, Inc.
(FTK) is pulling ahead at 26. 9% versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 239. 2% year-over-year, compared to -12. 6% for Nine Energy Service, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FTK leads at 20. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FTK or NINE or PUMP or NCSM?
Flotek Industries, Inc.
(FTK) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 9% net margin versus -7. 2% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FTK leads at 11. 9% versus 1. 5% for PUMP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NCSM leads at 38. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FTK or NINE or PUMP or NCSM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) trades at 11. 8x forward P/E versus 24. 5x for Flotek Industries, Inc. — 12. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NINE: 82. 7% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FTK or NINE or PUMP or NCSM?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is FTK or NINE or PUMP or NCSM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 16)). Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) carries a higher beta of 3. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NCSM: -89. 9%, NINE: -61. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FTK and NINE and PUMP and NCSM?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FTK is a small-cap high-growth stock; NINE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PUMP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NCSM is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.