Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FTK vs SOC vs WTTR vs SLB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Drilling
Regulated Water
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
FTK vs SOC vs WTTR vs SLB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Drilling | Regulated Water | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $488M | $1.84T | $1.89B | $79.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $252M | $1M | $1.40B | $35.71B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $30M | $-498M | $22M | $3.35B |
| Gross Margin | 24.5% | -8.7% | 18.2% | 18.2% |
| Operating Margin | 10.3% | -367.6% | 2.3% | 15.3% |
| Forward P/E | 23.8x | 7.5x | 41.7x | 19.8x |
| Total Debt | $50M | $0.00 | $374M | $12.31B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $98M | $18M | $3.04B |
FTK vs SOC vs WTTR vs SLB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flotek Industries, … (FTK) | 100 | 177.6 | +77.6% |
| Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) | 100 | 132.5 | +32.5% |
| Select Water Soluti… (WTTR) | 100 | 348.2 | +248.2% |
| SLB N.V. (SLB) | 100 | 196.1 | +96.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FTK vs SOC vs WTTR vs SLB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FTK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 26.9%, EPS growth 147.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.4%
- 26.9% revenue growth vs WTTR's -3.1%
- 11.8% margin vs SOC's -391.5%
- 14.3% ROA vs SOC's -28.9%, ROIC 15.1% vs -44.6%
SOC is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 41.7x)
WTTR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 26.6% 10Y total return vs SOC's 32.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.09, Low D/E 40.4%, current ratio 1.57x
- +134.2% vs SOC's -36.8%
SLB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 2.0%
- Beta 0.87, yield 2.0%, current ratio 1.33x
- Beta 0.87 vs FTK's 1.73
- 2.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs WTTR's 1.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.9% revenue growth vs WTTR's -3.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 41.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.8% margin vs SOC's -391.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs FTK's 1.73 | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs WTTR's 1.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +134.2% vs SOC's -36.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.3% ROA vs SOC's -28.9%, ROIC 15.1% vs -44.6% |
FTK vs SOC vs WTTR vs SLB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FTK vs SOC vs WTTR vs SLB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FTK leads in 2 of 6 categories
WTTR leads 2 • SLB leads 1 • SOC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FTK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLB is the larger business by revenue, generating $35.7B annually — 28095.2x SOC's $1M. FTK is the more profitable business, keeping 11.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOC's -391.5%. On growth, FTK holds the edge at +26.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $252M | $1M | $1.4B | $35.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $37M | -$454M | $217M | $7.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $30M | -$498M | $22M | $3.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$611M | -$95M | $4.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.5% | -8.7% | +18.2% | +18.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.3% | -367.6% | +2.3% | +15.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | -391.5% | +1.5% | +9.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.2% | -480.4% | -6.8% | +13.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.5% | — | -2.3% | +5.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -29.4% | -5.4% | -4.4% | -31.2% |
Valuation Metrics
WTTR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.3x trailing earnings, FTK trades at a 77% valuation discount to WTTR's 84.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WTTR's 10.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FTK's 14.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $488M | $1.84T | $1.9B | $79.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $533M | $1.84T | $2.2B | $88.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.29x | -3.07x | 84.10x | 22.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.83x | 7.50x | 41.66x | 19.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.68x | — | 10.70x | 12.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.06x | — | 1.34x | 2.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.18x | 2359.43x | 1.88x | 2.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 93.51x | — | — | 16.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FTK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FTK delivers a 28.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $-114 for SOC. WTTR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.40x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SLB's 0.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FTK scores 4/9 vs SOC's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +28.8% | -113.8% | +2.2% | +13.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +14.3% | -28.9% | +1.3% | +6.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.1% | -44.6% | +2.3% | +12.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +20.2% | -37.5% | +2.9% | +14.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.44x | — | 0.40x | 0.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $44M | -$98M | $356M | $9.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $98M | $18M | $3.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $50M | $0 | $374M | $12.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.96x | -2.28x | 1.54x | 9.40x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WTTR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WTTR five years ago would be worth $25,837 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,264 for SOC. Over the past 12 months, WTTR leads with a +134.2% total return vs SOC's -36.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FTK at 63.3% vs SLB's 6.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.0% | +9.5% | +52.9% | +32.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +59.6% | -36.8% | +134.2% | +61.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +335.5% | +26.5% | +135.9% | +20.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.6% | +32.6% | +158.4% | +80.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.7% | +32.4% | +26.6% | -9.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +63.3% | +8.2% | +33.1% | +6.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WTTR and SLB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SLB is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FTK's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WTTR currently trades 93.7% from its 52-week high vs SOC's 36.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.73x | 1.51x | 1.09x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.41 | $35.00 | $17.95 | $57.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.75 | $3.72 | $7.20 | $31.64 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.4% | +36.7% | +93.7% | +92.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.5 | 45.8 | 69.4 | 57.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 264K | 5.4M | 1.7M | 16.3M |
Analyst Outlook
SLB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FTK as "Buy", SOC as "Buy", WTTR as "Buy", SLB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 110.3% upside for SOC (target: $27) vs -4.9% for WTTR (target: $16). For income investors, SLB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.03% vs WTTR's 1.93%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.00 | $27.00 | $16.00 | $56.95 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 4 | 14 | 66 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.9% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 3 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.32 | $1.08 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.4% | +3.0% |
FTK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WTTR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
FTK vs SOC vs WTTR vs SLB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FTK or SOC or WTTR or SLB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Flotek Industries, Inc.
(FTK) is the stronger pick with 26. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 1% for Select Water Solutions, Inc. (WTTR). Flotek Industries, Inc. (FTK) offers the better valuation at 19. 3x trailing P/E (23. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Flotek Industries, Inc. (FTK) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FTK or SOC or WTTR or SLB?
On trailing P/E, Flotek Industries, Inc.
(FTK) is the cheapest at 19. 3x versus Select Water Solutions, Inc. at 84. 1x. On forward P/E, Sable Offshore Corp. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FTK or SOC or WTTR or SLB?
Over the past 5 years, Select Water Solutions, Inc.
(WTTR) delivered a total return of +158. 4%, compared to +32. 6% for Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SOC returned +32. 4% versus FTK's -74. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FTK or SOC or WTTR or SLB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SLB N.
V. (SLB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus Flotek Industries, Inc. 's 1. 73β — meaning FTK is approximately 100% more volatile than SLB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Select Water Solutions, Inc. (WTTR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 40% versus 45% for SLB N. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FTK or SOC or WTTR or SLB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flotek Industries, Inc.
(FTK) is pulling ahead at 26. 9% versus -3. 1% for Select Water Solutions, Inc. (WTTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flotek Industries, Inc. grew EPS 147. 1% year-over-year, compared to -33. 3% for Select Water Solutions, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FTK leads at 20. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FTK or SOC or WTTR or SLB?
Flotek Industries, Inc.
(FTK) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 9% net margin versus -391. 5% for Sable Offshore Corp. — meaning it keeps 12. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SLB leads at 15. 3% versus -367. 6% for SOC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FTK leads at 24. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FTK or SOC or WTTR or SLB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sable Offshore Corp.
(SOC) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 41. 7x for Select Water Solutions, Inc. — 34. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SOC: 110. 3% to $27. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FTK or SOC or WTTR or SLB?
In this comparison, SLB (2.
0% yield), WTTR (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. FTK, SOC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FTK or SOC or WTTR or SLB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SLB N.
V. (SLB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87), 2. 0% yield). Flotek Industries, Inc. (FTK) carries a higher beta of 1. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SLB: -9. 2%, FTK: -74. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FTK and SOC and WTTR and SLB?
These companies operate in different sectors (FTK (Energy) and SOC (Energy) and WTTR (Utilities) and SLB (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FTK is a small-cap high-growth stock; SOC is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; WTTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SLB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. WTTR, SLB pay a dividend while FTK, SOC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.