Regulated Electric
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FTS vs CMS vs WEC vs EVRG vs AEE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Electric
Regulated Electric
Regulated Electric
Regulated Electric
FTS vs CMS vs WEC vs EVRG vs AEE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Electric | Regulated Electric | Regulated Electric | Regulated Electric | Regulated Electric |
| Market Cap | $28.47B | $22.85B | $36.74B | $19.05B | $30.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12.22B | $8.82B | $10.08B | $5.99B | $8.88B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.80B | $1.11B | $1.64B | $882M | $1.52B |
| Gross Margin | 60.8% | 64.6% | 55.7% | 41.5% | 51.7% |
| Operating Margin | 28.4% | 19.5% | 24.0% | 25.4% | 24.0% |
| Forward P/E | 15.2x | 19.0x | 20.2x | 19.5x | 20.3x |
| Total Debt | $34.63B | $18.94B | $22.31B | $15.44B | $19.83B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $367M | $615M | $28M | $25M | $13M |
FTS vs CMS vs WEC vs EVRG vs AEE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fortis Inc. (FTS) | 100 | 146.3 | +46.3% |
| CMS Energy Corporat… (CMS) | 100 | 126.3 | +26.3% |
| WEC Energy Group, I… (WEC) | 100 | 122.9 | +22.9% |
| Evergy, Inc. (EVRG) | 100 | 134.1 | +34.1% |
| Ameren Corporation (AEE) | 100 | 145.5 | +45.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FTS vs CMS vs WEC vs EVRG vs AEE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FTS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (15.2x vs 19.5x), PEG 3.02 vs 3.19
CMS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.01, yield 3.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.01, current ratio 0.98x
- Beta 0.01, yield 3.0%, current ratio 0.98x
- Beta 0.01 vs EVRG's 0.06
WEC is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 3.3% ROA vs FTS's 2.4%, ROIC 5.1% vs 4.4%
EVRG has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in dividends and momentum.
- 3.2% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs WEC's 3.1%
- +22.7% vs CMS's +3.0%
AEE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 15.4%, EPS growth 21.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.4%
- 170.4% 10Y total return vs WEC's 133.1%
- PEG 2.29 vs WEC's 4.06
- 15.4% revenue growth vs EVRG's 1.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.4% revenue growth vs EVRG's 1.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.2x vs 19.5x), PEG 3.02 vs 3.19 | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.2% margin vs CMS's 12.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs EVRG's 0.06 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs WEC's 3.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +22.7% vs CMS's +3.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.3% ROA vs FTS's 2.4%, ROIC 5.1% vs 4.4% |
FTS vs CMS vs WEC vs EVRG vs AEE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FTS vs CMS vs WEC vs EVRG vs AEE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WEC leads in 1 of 6 categories
EVRG leads 1 • FTS leads 0 • CMS leads 0 • AEE leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CMS and AEE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FTS is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.2B annually — 2.0x EVRG's $6.0B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 17.2% (AEE) to 12.5% (CMS). On growth, CMS holds the edge at +11.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12.2B | $8.8B | $10.1B | $6.0B | $8.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5.5B | $2.9B | $3.9B | $2.7B | $3.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.8B | $1.1B | $1.6B | $882M | $1.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2.2B | -$2.0B | -$1.1B | -$1.1B | -$1.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +60.8% | +64.6% | +55.7% | +41.5% | +51.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +28.4% | +19.5% | +24.0% | +25.4% | +24.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.8% | +12.5% | +16.2% | +14.7% | +17.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -18.4% | -23.1% | -11.0% | -18.3% | -14.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.6% | +11.6% | +9.0% | +5.5% | +3.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.0% | +11.9% | +7.9% | +18.5% | +19.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FTS and AEE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.3x trailing earnings, AEE trades at a 13% valuation discount to WEC's 23.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AEE offers better value at 2.30x vs WEC's 4.70x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $28.5B | $22.8B | $36.7B | $19.1B | $30.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $53.6B | $41.2B | $59.0B | $34.5B | $49.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.52x | 20.95x | 23.35x | 22.60x | 20.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.19x | 19.05x | 20.15x | 19.52x | 20.25x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.48x | 3.50x | 4.70x | 3.70x | 2.30x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.18x | 14.31x | 15.32x | 12.72x | 13.51x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.19x | 2.68x | 3.75x | 3.22x | 3.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.57x | 2.29x | 2.63x | 1.88x | 2.19x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
WEC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WEC delivers a 11.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $7 for FTS. FTS carries lower financial leverage with a 1.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMS's 1.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FTS scores 6/9 vs EVRG's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.9% | +11.6% | +11.6% | +8.6% | +11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.4% | +2.8% | +3.3% | +2.6% | +3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.4% | +4.9% | +5.1% | +4.5% | +4.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.2% | +5.0% | +5.4% | +4.9% | +4.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.34x | 1.95x | 1.59x | 1.50x | 1.47x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $34.3B | $18.3B | $22.3B | $15.4B | $19.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $367M | $615M | $28M | $25M | $13M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $34.6B | $18.9B | $22.3B | $15.4B | $19.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.59x | 2.58x | 2.87x | 2.46x | 2.61x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EVRG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EVRG five years ago would be worth $14,912 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,036 for CMS. Over the past 12 months, EVRG leads with a +22.7% total return vs CMS's +3.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EVRG at 13.4% vs WEC's 9.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.0% | +5.8% | +6.8% | +14.2% | +8.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +16.4% | +3.0% | +6.2% | +22.7% | +12.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.9% | +30.3% | +29.4% | +46.0% | +31.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.7% | +30.4% | +31.8% | +49.1% | +43.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +130.8% | +119.4% | +133.1% | +100.7% | +170.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.2% | +9.2% | +9.0% | +13.4% | +9.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FTS and EVRG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FTS is the less volatile stock with a -0.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EVRG's 0.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EVRG currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs CMS's 92.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.26x | 0.01x | -0.03x | 0.06x | 0.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $58.78 | $80.36 | $119.62 | $85.27 | $115.58 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $45.87 | $67.71 | $100.61 | $63.29 | $93.27 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.5% | +92.0% | +94.3% | +97.0% | +94.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.8 | 38.2 | 44.5 | 45.8 | 43.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 669K | 2.6M | 1.8M | 1.8M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WEC and EVRG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FTS as "Hold", CMS as "Buy", WEC as "Hold", EVRG as "Hold", AEE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 11.4% upside for AEE (target: $121) vs 7.6% for EVRG (target: $89). For income investors, EVRG offers the higher dividend yield at 3.17% vs FTS's 1.95%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $62.00 | $81.00 | $122.78 | $89.00 | $121.11 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 29 | 34 | 18 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | +3.0% | +3.1% | +3.2% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 19 | 23 | 6 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.49 | $2.21 | $3.50 | $2.62 | $2.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
WEC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). EVRG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
FTS vs CMS vs WEC vs EVRG vs AEE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FTS or CMS or WEC or EVRG or AEE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ameren Corporation (AEE) is the stronger pick with 15.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 7% for Evergy, Inc. (EVRG). Ameren Corporation (AEE) offers the better valuation at 20. 3x trailing P/E (20. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FTS or CMS or WEC or EVRG or AEE?
On trailing P/E, Ameren Corporation (AEE) is the cheapest at 20.
3x versus WEC Energy Group, Inc. at 23. 3x. On forward P/E, Fortis Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Ameren Corporation wins at 2. 29x versus WEC Energy Group, Inc. 's 4. 06x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FTS or CMS or WEC or EVRG or AEE?
Over the past 5 years, Evergy, Inc.
(EVRG) delivered a total return of +49. 1%, compared to +30. 4% for CMS Energy Corporation (CMS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AEE returned +170. 4% versus EVRG's +100. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FTS or CMS or WEC or EVRG or AEE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fortis Inc.
(FTS) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 26β versus Evergy, Inc. 's 0. 06β — meaning EVRG is approximately -124% more volatile than FTS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fortis Inc. (FTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 134% versus 195% for CMS Energy Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FTS or CMS or WEC or EVRG or AEE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ameren Corporation (AEE) is pulling ahead at 15.
4% versus 1. 7% for Evergy, Inc. (EVRG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ameren Corporation grew EPS 21. 0% year-over-year, compared to -3. 4% for Evergy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AEE leads at 3. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FTS or CMS or WEC or EVRG or AEE?
Ameren Corporation (AEE) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
5% net margin versus 12. 5% for CMS Energy Corporation — meaning it keeps 16. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FTS leads at 28. 7% versus 20. 2% for CMS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FTS leads at 72. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FTS or CMS or WEC or EVRG or AEE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Ameren Corporation (AEE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 29x versus WEC Energy Group, Inc. 's 4. 06x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Fortis Inc. (FTS) trades at 15. 2x forward P/E versus 20. 3x for Ameren Corporation — 5. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AEE: 11. 4% to $121. 11.
08Which pays a better dividend — FTS or CMS or WEC or EVRG or AEE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Evergy, Inc. (EVRG) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 1. 9% for Fortis Inc. (FTS).
09Is FTS or CMS or WEC or EVRG or AEE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Fortis Inc.
(FTS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 26), 1. 9% yield, +130. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FTS: +130. 8%, EVRG: +100. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FTS and CMS and WEC and EVRG and AEE?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FTS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CMS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; WEC is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; EVRG is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; AEE is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.