Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FTS vs CMS vs WEC vs EVRG vs AEE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FTS
Fortis Inc.

Regulated Electric

UtilitiesNYSE • CA
Market Cap$28.47B
5Y Perf.+46.3%
CMS
CMS Energy Corporation

Regulated Electric

UtilitiesNYSE • US
Market Cap$22.85B
5Y Perf.+26.3%
WEC
WEC Energy Group, Inc.

Regulated Electric

UtilitiesNYSE • US
Market Cap$36.74B
5Y Perf.+22.9%
EVRG
Evergy, Inc.

Regulated Electric

UtilitiesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$19.05B
5Y Perf.+34.1%
AEE
Ameren Corporation

Regulated Electric

UtilitiesNYSE • US
Market Cap$30.09B
5Y Perf.+45.5%

FTS vs CMS vs WEC vs EVRG vs AEE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FTS logoFTS
CMS logoCMS
WEC logoWEC
EVRG logoEVRG
AEE logoAEE
IndustryRegulated ElectricRegulated ElectricRegulated ElectricRegulated ElectricRegulated Electric
Market Cap$28.47B$22.85B$36.74B$19.05B$30.09B
Revenue (TTM)$12.22B$8.82B$10.08B$5.99B$8.88B
Net Income (TTM)$1.80B$1.11B$1.64B$882M$1.52B
Gross Margin60.8%64.6%55.7%41.5%51.7%
Operating Margin28.4%19.5%24.0%25.4%24.0%
Forward P/E15.2x19.0x20.2x19.5x20.3x
Total Debt$34.63B$18.94B$22.31B$15.44B$19.83B
Cash & Equiv.$367M$615M$28M$25M$13M

FTS vs CMS vs WEC vs EVRG vs AEELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FTS
CMS
WEC
EVRG
AEE
StockMay 20May 26Return
Fortis Inc. (FTS)100146.3+46.3%
CMS Energy Corporat… (CMS)100126.3+26.3%
WEC Energy Group, I… (WEC)100122.9+22.9%
Evergy, Inc. (EVRG)100134.1+34.1%
Ameren Corporation (AEE)100145.5+45.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FTS vs CMS vs WEC vs EVRG vs AEE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: EVRG and AEE are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Ameren Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. FTS, CMS, and WEC also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FTS
Fortis Inc.
The Value Play

FTS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Lower P/E (15.2x vs 19.5x), PEG 3.02 vs 3.19
Best for: value
CMS
CMS Energy Corporation
The Income Pick

CMS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.01, yield 3.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.01, current ratio 0.98x
  • Beta 0.01, yield 3.0%, current ratio 0.98x
  • Beta 0.01 vs EVRG's 0.06
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
WEC
WEC Energy Group, Inc.
The Niche Pick

WEC is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.

  • 3.3% ROA vs FTS's 2.4%, ROIC 5.1% vs 4.4%
Best for: efficiency
EVRG
Evergy, Inc.
The Income Pick

EVRG has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in dividends and momentum.

  • 3.2% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs WEC's 3.1%
  • +22.7% vs CMS's +3.0%
Best for: dividends and momentum
AEE
Ameren Corporation
The Growth Play

AEE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 15.4%, EPS growth 21.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.4%
  • 170.4% 10Y total return vs WEC's 133.1%
  • PEG 2.29 vs WEC's 4.06
  • 15.4% revenue growth vs EVRG's 1.7%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAEE logoAEE15.4% revenue growth vs EVRG's 1.7%
ValueFTS logoFTSLower P/E (15.2x vs 19.5x), PEG 3.02 vs 3.19
Quality / MarginsAEE logoAEE17.2% margin vs CMS's 12.5%
Stability / SafetyCMS logoCMSBeta 0.01 vs EVRG's 0.06
DividendsEVRG logoEVRG3.2% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs WEC's 3.1%
Momentum (1Y)EVRG logoEVRG+22.7% vs CMS's +3.0%
Efficiency (ROA)WEC logoWEC3.3% ROA vs FTS's 2.4%, ROIC 5.1% vs 4.4%

FTS vs CMS vs WEC vs EVRG vs AEE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FTSFortis Inc.
FY 2025
Electric and Gas
97.3%$11.6B
Other Services
2.7%$316M
CMSCMS Energy Corporation
FY 2025
Residential Utility Services
57.3%$4.4B
Commercial Utility Service
31.9%$2.4B
Industrial Utility Service
10.8%$824M
WECWEC Energy Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Wisconsin
71.0%$7.3B
Illinois
16.4%$1.7B
Non-Utility Energy Infrastructure
7.5%$770M
Other States
5.1%$528M
EVRGEvergy, Inc.
FY 2017
Electric Utility Segment
100.0%$2.7B
AEEAmeren Corporation
FY 2025
Electricity
87.1%$7.7B
Natural Gas
12.9%$1.1B

FTS vs CMS vs WEC vs EVRG vs AEE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLWECLAGGINGAEE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — CMS and AEE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

FTS is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.2B annually — 2.0x EVRG's $6.0B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 17.2% (AEE) to 12.5% (CMS). On growth, CMS holds the edge at +11.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFTS logoFTSFortis Inc.CMS logoCMSCMS Energy Corpor…WEC logoWECWEC Energy Group,…EVRG logoEVRGEvergy, Inc.AEE logoAEEAmeren Corporation
RevenueTrailing 12 months$12.2B$8.8B$10.1B$6.0B$8.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$5.5B$2.9B$3.9B$2.7B$3.7B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$1.8B$1.1B$1.6B$882M$1.5B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$2.2B-$2.0B-$1.1B-$1.1B-$1.3B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+60.8%+64.6%+55.7%+41.5%+51.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+28.4%+19.5%+24.0%+25.4%+24.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+14.8%+12.5%+16.2%+14.7%+17.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-18.4%-23.1%-11.0%-18.3%-14.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+1.6%+11.6%+9.0%+5.5%+3.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-1.0%+11.9%+7.9%+18.5%+19.6%
Evenly matched — CMS and AEE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — FTS and AEE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 20.3x trailing earnings, AEE trades at a 13% valuation discount to WEC's 23.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AEE offers better value at 2.30x vs WEC's 4.70x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricFTS logoFTSFortis Inc.CMS logoCMSCMS Energy Corpor…WEC logoWECWEC Energy Group,…EVRG logoEVRGEvergy, Inc.AEE logoAEEAmeren Corporation
Market CapShares × price$28.5B$22.8B$36.7B$19.1B$30.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$53.6B$41.2B$59.0B$34.5B$49.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS22.52x20.95x23.35x22.60x20.33x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.15.19x19.05x20.15x19.52x20.25x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate4.48x3.50x4.70x3.70x2.30x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.18x14.31x15.32x12.72x13.51x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.19x2.68x3.75x3.22x3.42x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.57x2.29x2.63x1.88x2.19x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
Evenly matched — FTS and AEE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

WEC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

WEC delivers a 11.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $7 for FTS. FTS carries lower financial leverage with a 1.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMS's 1.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FTS scores 6/9 vs EVRG's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricFTS logoFTSFortis Inc.CMS logoCMSCMS Energy Corpor…WEC logoWECWEC Energy Group,…EVRG logoEVRGEvergy, Inc.AEE logoAEEAmeren Corporation
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.9%+11.6%+11.6%+8.6%+11.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.4%+2.8%+3.3%+2.6%+3.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.4%+4.9%+5.1%+4.5%+4.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+5.2%+5.0%+5.4%+4.9%+4.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–966546
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.34x1.95x1.59x1.50x1.47x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$34.3B$18.3B$22.3B$15.4B$19.8B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$367M$615M$28M$25M$13M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$34.6B$18.9B$22.3B$15.4B$19.8B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.59x2.58x2.87x2.46x2.61x
WEC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

EVRG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in EVRG five years ago would be worth $14,912 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,036 for CMS. Over the past 12 months, EVRG leads with a +22.7% total return vs CMS's +3.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EVRG at 13.4% vs WEC's 9.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFTS logoFTSFortis Inc.CMS logoCMSCMS Energy Corpor…WEC logoWECWEC Energy Group,…EVRG logoEVRGEvergy, Inc.AEE logoAEEAmeren Corporation
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+9.0%+5.8%+6.8%+14.2%+8.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+16.4%+3.0%+6.2%+22.7%+12.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+33.9%+30.3%+29.4%+46.0%+31.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+42.7%+30.4%+31.8%+49.1%+43.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+130.8%+119.4%+133.1%+100.7%+170.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+10.2%+9.2%+9.0%+13.4%+9.5%
EVRG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FTS and EVRG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

FTS is the less volatile stock with a -0.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EVRG's 0.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EVRG currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs CMS's 92.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFTS logoFTSFortis Inc.CMS logoCMSCMS Energy Corpor…WEC logoWECWEC Energy Group,…EVRG logoEVRGEvergy, Inc.AEE logoAEEAmeren Corporation
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-0.26x0.01x-0.03x0.06x0.05x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$58.78$80.36$119.62$85.27$115.58
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$45.87$67.71$100.61$63.29$93.27
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+95.5%+92.0%+94.3%+97.0%+94.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10045.838.244.545.843.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded669K2.6M1.8M1.8M1.5M
Evenly matched — FTS and EVRG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — WEC and EVRG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: FTS as "Hold", CMS as "Buy", WEC as "Hold", EVRG as "Hold", AEE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 11.4% upside for AEE (target: $121) vs 7.6% for EVRG (target: $89). For income investors, EVRG offers the higher dividend yield at 3.17% vs FTS's 1.95%.

MetricFTS logoFTSFortis Inc.CMS logoCMSCMS Energy Corpor…WEC logoWECWEC Energy Group,…EVRG logoEVRGEvergy, Inc.AEE logoAEEAmeren Corporation
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHoldHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$62.00$81.00$122.78$89.00$121.11
# AnalystsCovering analysts1229341822
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%+3.0%+3.1%+3.2%+2.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01923616
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.49$2.21$3.50$2.62$2.82
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.0%0.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — WEC and EVRG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

WEC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). EVRG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.

Best OverallWEC Energy Group, Inc. (WEC)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FTS vs CMS vs WEC vs EVRG vs AEE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FTS or CMS or WEC or EVRG or AEE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Ameren Corporation (AEE) is the stronger pick with 15.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 7% for Evergy, Inc. (EVRG). Ameren Corporation (AEE) offers the better valuation at 20. 3x trailing P/E (20. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FTS or CMS or WEC or EVRG or AEE?

On trailing P/E, Ameren Corporation (AEE) is the cheapest at 20.

3x versus WEC Energy Group, Inc. at 23. 3x. On forward P/E, Fortis Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Ameren Corporation wins at 2. 29x versus WEC Energy Group, Inc. 's 4. 06x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FTS or CMS or WEC or EVRG or AEE?

Over the past 5 years, Evergy, Inc.

(EVRG) delivered a total return of +49. 1%, compared to +30. 4% for CMS Energy Corporation (CMS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AEE returned +170. 4% versus EVRG's +100. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FTS or CMS or WEC or EVRG or AEE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fortis Inc.

(FTS) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 26β versus Evergy, Inc. 's 0. 06β — meaning EVRG is approximately -124% more volatile than FTS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fortis Inc. (FTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 134% versus 195% for CMS Energy Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FTS or CMS or WEC or EVRG or AEE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ameren Corporation (AEE) is pulling ahead at 15.

4% versus 1. 7% for Evergy, Inc. (EVRG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ameren Corporation grew EPS 21. 0% year-over-year, compared to -3. 4% for Evergy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AEE leads at 3. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FTS or CMS or WEC or EVRG or AEE?

Ameren Corporation (AEE) is the more profitable company, earning 16.

5% net margin versus 12. 5% for CMS Energy Corporation — meaning it keeps 16. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FTS leads at 28. 7% versus 20. 2% for CMS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FTS leads at 72. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FTS or CMS or WEC or EVRG or AEE more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Ameren Corporation (AEE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 29x versus WEC Energy Group, Inc. 's 4. 06x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Fortis Inc. (FTS) trades at 15. 2x forward P/E versus 20. 3x for Ameren Corporation — 5. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AEE: 11. 4% to $121. 11.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FTS or CMS or WEC or EVRG or AEE?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Evergy, Inc. (EVRG) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 1. 9% for Fortis Inc. (FTS).

09

Is FTS or CMS or WEC or EVRG or AEE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Fortis Inc.

(FTS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 26), 1. 9% yield, +130. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FTS: +130. 8%, EVRG: +100. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FTS and CMS and WEC and EVRG and AEE?

Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FTS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CMS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; WEC is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; EVRG is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; AEE is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

FTS

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Utilities
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 8%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CMS

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Utilities
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WEC

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Utilities
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EVRG

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Utilities
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AEE

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Utilities
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 10%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FTS and CMS and WEC and EVRG and AEE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FTS: 1.6% · CMS: 11.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(FTS: 14.8% · CMS: 12.5%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(FTS: 22.5x · CMS: 21.0x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.