Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
FVCB vs CZWI vs MNSB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
FVCB vs CZWI vs MNSB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $302M | $207M | $184M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $120M | $90M | $135M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $22M | $14M | $16M |
| Gross Margin | 53.1% | 54.7% | 54.3% |
| Operating Margin | 23.6% | 7.0% | 14.1% |
| Forward P/E | 11.4x | 11.8x | 11.0x |
| Total Debt | $25M | $52M | $70M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $119M | $26M |
FVCB vs CZWI vs MNSB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FVCBankcorp, Inc. (FVCB) | 100 | 195.0 | +95.0% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 312.8 | +212.8% |
| MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB) | 100 | 188.9 | +88.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FVCB vs CZWI vs MNSB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FVCB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 9.4%, EPS growth 47.6%
- PEG 1.73 vs CZWI's 2.32
- 9.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.50, yield 1.7%
- 149.0% 10Y total return vs MNSB's 135.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
MNSB is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 3.1% vs FVCB's 2.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.4x vs 11.8x), PEG 1.73 vs 2.32 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs MNSB's 0.60, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs FVCB's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.1% vs MNSB's +37.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CZWI's 0.5% |
FVCB vs CZWI vs MNSB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FVCB vs CZWI vs MNSB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FVCB leads in 3 of 6 categories
CZWI leads 2 • MNSB leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FVCB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MNSB is the larger business by revenue, generating $135M annually — 1.5x CZWI's $90M. FVCB is the more profitable business, keeping 18.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MNSB's 11.5%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $120M | $90M | $135M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $29M | $9M | $23M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $22M | $14M | $16M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $24M | $11M | $11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.1% | +54.7% | +54.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.6% | +7.0% | +14.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.4% | +16.0% | +11.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.9% | +12.4% | +7.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.8% | +63.0% | +120.9% |
Valuation Metrics
FVCB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.9x trailing earnings, FVCB trades at a 6% valuation discount to CZWI's 14.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FVCB offers better value at 2.11x vs CZWI's 2.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $302M | $207M | $184M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $321M | $140M | $227M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.88x | 14.70x | 14.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.38x | 11.79x | 11.03x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.11x | 2.90x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.38x | 15.69x | 11.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.47x | 2.29x | 1.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.21x | 1.11x | 0.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.65x | 19.90x | 17.26x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FVCB leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FVCB delivers a 8.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $7 for MNSB. FVCB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MNSB's 0.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FVCB scores 9/9 vs MNSB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.9% | +7.8% | +7.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +0.8% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.2% | +2.0% | +5.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.9% | +0.6% | +6.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.28x | 0.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $20M | -$67M | $43M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $119M | $26M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $25M | $52M | $70M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.52x | 0.16x | 0.31x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $16,900 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,813 for MNSB. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +52.1% total return vs MNSB's +37.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 36.4% vs MNSB's 4.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.2% | +24.3% | +26.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +49.1% | +52.1% | +37.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.8% | +153.7% | +13.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.2% | +69.0% | +18.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.8% | +149.0% | +135.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.3% | +36.4% | +4.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CZWI and MNSB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MNSB's 0.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MNSB currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs FVCB's 91.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.60x | 0.50x | 0.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.41 | $22.62 | $25.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.13 | $12.83 | $17.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.2% | +94.9% | +99.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.0 | 51.2 | 65.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 205K | 41K | 45K |
Analyst Outlook
CZWI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FVCB as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy", MNSB as "Hold". For income investors, CZWI offers the higher dividend yield at 1.73% vs FVCB's 0.71%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.00 | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +1.7% | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 6 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.12 | $0.37 | $0.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.2% | +3.0% | +2.4% |
FVCB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CZWI leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
FVCB vs CZWI vs MNSB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FVCB or CZWI or MNSB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, FVCBankcorp, Inc.
(FVCB) is the stronger pick with 9. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). FVCBankcorp, Inc. (FVCB) offers the better valuation at 13. 9x trailing P/E (11. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FVCBankcorp, Inc. (FVCB) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FVCB or CZWI or MNSB?
On trailing P/E, FVCBankcorp, Inc.
(FVCB) is the cheapest at 13. 9x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. at 14. 7x. On forward P/E, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: FVCBankcorp, Inc. wins at 1. 73x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FVCB or CZWI or MNSB?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) delivered a total return of +69. 0%, compared to +18. 1% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZWI returned +149. 0% versus FVCB's +84. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FVCB or CZWI or MNSB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 50β versus MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. 's 0. 60β — meaning MNSB is approximately 20% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FVCBankcorp, Inc. (FVCB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 32% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FVCB or CZWI or MNSB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), FVCBankcorp, Inc.
(FVCB) is pulling ahead at 9. 4% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to 9. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FVCB or CZWI or MNSB?
FVCBankcorp, Inc.
(FVCB) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 1% net margin versus 11. 5% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FVCB leads at 23. 1% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CZWI leads at 54. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FVCB or CZWI or MNSB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, FVCBankcorp, Inc. (FVCB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 73x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB) trades at 11. 0x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 0. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — FVCB or CZWI or MNSB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) offers the highest yield at 1. 7%, versus 0. 7% for FVCBankcorp, Inc. (FVCB).
09Is FVCB or CZWI or MNSB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 50), 1. 7% yield, +149. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +149. 0%, FVCB: +84. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FVCB and CZWI and MNSB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.