Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
FVCB vs MNSB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
FVCB vs MNSB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $302M | $184M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $120M | $135M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $22M | $16M |
| Gross Margin | 53.1% | 54.3% |
| Operating Margin | 23.6% | 14.1% |
| Forward P/E | 11.4x | 11.0x |
| Total Debt | $25M | $70M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $26M |
FVCB vs MNSB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FVCBankcorp, Inc. (FVCB) | 100 | 195.0 | +95.0% |
| MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB) | 100 | 188.9 | +88.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FVCB vs MNSB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FVCB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.60, yield 0.7%
- Rev growth 9.4%, EPS growth 47.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.60, Low D/E 10.0%, current ratio 0.14x
MNSB is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and bank quality.
- 135.4% 10Y total return vs FVCB's 84.8%
- NIM 3.1% vs FVCB's 2.8%
- Lower P/E (11.0x vs 11.4x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.4% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.0x vs 11.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs MNSB's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.60 vs MNSB's 0.60, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs MNSB's 1.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +49.1% vs MNSB's +37.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs MNSB's 0.4% |
FVCB vs MNSB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FVCB vs MNSB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FVCB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MNSB and FVCB operate at a comparable scale, with $135M and $120M in trailing revenue. FVCB is the more profitable business, keeping 18.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MNSB's 11.5%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $120M | $135M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $29M | $23M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $22M | $16M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $24M | $11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.1% | +54.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.6% | +14.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.4% | +11.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.9% | +7.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.8% | +120.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FVCB and MNSB each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.9x trailing earnings, FVCB trades at a 2% valuation discount to MNSB's 14.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FVCB's 11.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MNSB's 11.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $302M | $184M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $321M | $227M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.88x | 14.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.38x | 11.03x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.11x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.38x | 11.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.47x | 1.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.21x | 0.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.65x | 17.26x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FVCB leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FVCB delivers a 8.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $7 for MNSB. FVCB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MNSB's 0.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FVCB scores 9/9 vs MNSB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.9% | +7.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.2% | +5.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.9% | +6.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $20M | $43M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $26M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $25M | $70M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.52x | 0.31x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FVCB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FVCB five years ago would be worth $12,119 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,813 for MNSB. Over the past 12 months, FVCB leads with a +49.1% total return vs MNSB's +37.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FVCB at 18.3% vs MNSB's 4.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.2% | +26.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +49.1% | +37.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.8% | +13.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.2% | +18.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.8% | +135.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.3% | +4.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FVCB and MNSB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FVCB is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MNSB's 0.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MNSB currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs FVCB's 91.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.60x | 0.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.41 | $25.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.13 | $17.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.2% | +99.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.0 | 65.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 205K | 45K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FVCB and MNSB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FVCB as "Buy" and MNSB as "Hold". For income investors, MNSB offers the higher dividend yield at 1.60% vs FVCB's 0.71%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.12 | $0.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.2% | +2.4% |
FVCB leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
FVCB vs MNSB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FVCB or MNSB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, FVCBankcorp, Inc.
(FVCB) is the stronger pick with 9. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). FVCBankcorp, Inc. (FVCB) offers the better valuation at 13. 9x trailing P/E (11. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FVCBankcorp, Inc. (FVCB) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FVCB or MNSB?
On trailing P/E, FVCBankcorp, Inc.
(FVCB) is the cheapest at 13. 9x versus MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. at 14. 2x. On forward P/E, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FVCB or MNSB?
Over the past 5 years, FVCBankcorp, Inc.
(FVCB) delivered a total return of +21. 2%, compared to +18. 1% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MNSB returned +135. 4% versus FVCB's +84. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FVCB or MNSB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), FVCBankcorp, Inc.
(FVCB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 60β versus MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. 's 0. 60β — meaning MNSB is approximately 0% more volatile than FVCB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FVCBankcorp, Inc. (FVCB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 32% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FVCB or MNSB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), FVCBankcorp, Inc.
(FVCB) is pulling ahead at 9. 4% versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to 47. 6% for FVCBankcorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FVCB or MNSB?
FVCBankcorp, Inc.
(FVCB) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 1% net margin versus 11. 5% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FVCB leads at 23. 1% versus 14. 0% for MNSB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MNSB leads at 54. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FVCB or MNSB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
(MNSB) trades at 11. 0x forward P/E versus 11. 4x for FVCBankcorp, Inc. — 0. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — FVCB or MNSB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB) offers the highest yield at 1. 6%, versus 0. 7% for FVCBankcorp, Inc. (FVCB).
09Is FVCB or MNSB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
(MNSB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 60), 1. 6% yield, +135. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MNSB: +135. 4%, FVCB: +84. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FVCB and MNSB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.