Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GAM vs TRI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GAM
General American Investors Company, Inc.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.50B
5Y Perf.+105.7%
TRI
Thomson Reuters Corporation

Specialty Business Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • CA
Market Cap$40.01B
5Y Perf.+29.2%

GAM vs TRI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GAM logoGAM
TRI logoTRI
IndustryAsset ManagementSpecialty Business Services
Market Cap$1.50B$40.01B
Revenue (TTM)$252M$7.66B
Net Income (TTM)$202M$1.53B
Gross Margin100.0%53.7%
Operating Margin97.5%28.8%
Forward P/E6.0x20.8x
Total Debt$2M$2.12B
Cash & Equiv.$70K$511M

GAM vs TRILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GAM
TRI
StockMay 20May 26Return
General American In… (GAM)100205.7+105.7%
Thomson Reuters Cor… (TRI)100129.2+29.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GAM vs TRI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: GAM leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Thomson Reuters Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
GAM
General American Investors Company, Inc.
The Banking Pick

GAM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 180.6%, EPS growth -36.1%
  • 193.8% 10Y total return vs TRI's 153.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 31.80x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
TRI
Thomson Reuters Corporation
The Income Pick

TRI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.38, yield 2.6%
  • Beta 0.38, yield 2.6%, current ratio 0.64x
  • Beta 0.38 vs GAM's 0.74
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGAM logoGAM180.6% NII/revenue growth vs TRI's 4.8%
ValueGAM logoGAMLower P/E (6.0x vs 20.8x)
Quality / MarginsGAM logoGAM97.5% margin vs TRI's 19.9%
Stability / SafetyTRI logoTRIBeta 0.38 vs GAM's 0.74
DividendsTRI logoTRI2.6% yield; 7-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)GAM logoGAM+38.0% vs TRI's -50.2%
Efficiency (ROA)GAM logoGAM11.9% ROA vs TRI's 8.5%, ROIC 12.4% vs 11.2%

GAM vs TRI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GAMGeneral American Investors Company, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

TRIThomson Reuters Corporation
FY 2025
Electronic Software And Services
100.0%$7.0B

GAM vs TRI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLGAMLAGGINGTRI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

GAM leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

TRI is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.7B annually — 30.5x GAM's $252M. GAM is the more profitable business, keeping 97.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TRI's 19.9%.

MetricGAM logoGAMGeneral American …TRI logoTRIThomson Reuters C…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$252M$7.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$105,782$3.2B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$202M$1.5B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$0$1.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+100.0%+53.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+97.5%+28.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+97.5%+19.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+22.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+8.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+5.8%+7.6%
GAM leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

GAM leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

At 6.0x trailing earnings, GAM trades at a 78% valuation discount to TRI's 27.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GAM's 6.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TRI's 14.1x.

MetricGAM logoGAMGeneral American …TRI logoTRIThomson Reuters C…
Market CapShares × price$1.5B$40.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.5B$41.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS5.98x26.99x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.20.84x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate3.60x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.13x14.12x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue5.98x5.26x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.91x3.46x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF19.50x
GAM leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

GAM leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

TRI delivers a 12.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $12 for GAM. GAM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRI's 0.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRI scores 6/9 vs GAM's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricGAM logoGAMGeneral American …TRI logoTRIThomson Reuters C…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+12.0%+12.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+11.9%+8.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+12.4%+11.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+16.3%+13.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–946
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.00x0.18x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$2M$1.6B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$69,600$511M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2M$2.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense18.32x
GAM leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

GAM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in GAM five years ago would be worth $19,537 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,570 for TRI. Over the past 12 months, GAM leads with a +38.0% total return vs TRI's -50.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GAM at 25.6% vs TRI's -6.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGAM logoGAMGeneral American …TRI logoTRIThomson Reuters C…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+9.8%-28.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+38.0%-50.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+98.1%-19.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+95.4%+5.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+193.8%+153.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+25.6%-6.9%
GAM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — GAM and TRI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

TRI is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GAM's 0.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GAM currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs TRI's 41.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGAM logoGAMGeneral American …TRI logoTRIThomson Reuters C…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.74x0.38x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$66.18$221.97
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$51.22$79.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+97.6%+41.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10060.656.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded29K2.4M
Evenly matched — GAM and TRI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

TRI is the only dividend payer here at 2.55% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricGAM logoGAMGeneral American …TRI logoTRIThomson Reuters C…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$147.10
# AnalystsCovering analysts27
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises7
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.34
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+2.5%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

GAM leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.

Best OverallGeneral American Investors … (GAM)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GAM vs TRI: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GAM or TRI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, General American Investors Company, Inc.

(GAM) is the stronger pick with 180. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 8% for Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI). General American Investors Company, Inc. (GAM) offers the better valuation at 6. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — GAM or TRI?

On trailing P/E, General American Investors Company, Inc.

(GAM) is the cheapest at 6. 0x versus Thomson Reuters Corporation at 27. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — GAM or TRI?

Over the past 5 years, General American Investors Company, Inc.

(GAM) delivered a total return of +95. 4%, compared to +5. 7% for Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GAM returned +193. 8% versus TRI's +153. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — GAM or TRI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

38β versus General American Investors Company, Inc. 's 0. 74β — meaning GAM is approximately 96% more volatile than TRI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, General American Investors Company, Inc. (GAM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 18% for Thomson Reuters Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — GAM or TRI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), General American Investors Company, Inc.

(GAM) is pulling ahead at 180. 6% versus 4. 8% for Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Thomson Reuters Corporation grew EPS -30. 5% year-over-year, compared to -36. 1% for General American Investors Company, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — GAM or TRI?

General American Investors Company, Inc.

(GAM) is the more profitable company, earning 97. 5% net margin versus 20. 1% for Thomson Reuters Corporation — meaning it keeps 97. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GAM leads at 97. 5% versus 26. 3% for TRI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GAM leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Which pays a better dividend — GAM or TRI?

In this comparison, TRI (2.

6% yield) pays a dividend. GAM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is GAM or TRI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

38), 2. 6% yield, +153. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRI: +153. 1%, GAM: +193. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between GAM and TRI?

These companies operate in different sectors (GAM (Financial Services) and TRI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: GAM is a small-cap high-growth stock; TRI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. TRI pays a dividend while GAM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

GAM

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 90%
  • Net Margin > 58%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TRI

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform GAM and TRI on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(GAM: 180.6% · TRI: 8.3%)
Net Margin>
%
(GAM: 97.5% · TRI: 19.9%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(GAM: 6.0x · TRI: 27.0x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.