Asset Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GAM vs TRI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
GAM vs TRI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Specialty Business Services |
| Market Cap | $1.50B | $40.01B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $252M | $7.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $202M | $1.53B |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 53.7% |
| Operating Margin | 97.5% | 28.8% |
| Forward P/E | 6.0x | 20.8x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $2.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $70K | $511M |
GAM vs TRI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| General American In… (GAM) | 100 | 205.7 | +105.7% |
| Thomson Reuters Cor… (TRI) | 100 | 129.2 | +29.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GAM vs TRI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GAM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 180.6%, EPS growth -36.1%
- 193.8% 10Y total return vs TRI's 153.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 31.80x
TRI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.38, yield 2.6%
- Beta 0.38, yield 2.6%, current ratio 0.64x
- Beta 0.38 vs GAM's 0.74
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 180.6% NII/revenue growth vs TRI's 4.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.0x vs 20.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 97.5% margin vs TRI's 19.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs GAM's 0.74 | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield; 7-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +38.0% vs TRI's -50.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.9% ROA vs TRI's 8.5%, ROIC 12.4% vs 11.2% |
GAM vs TRI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GAM vs TRI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GAM leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRI is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.7B annually — 30.5x GAM's $252M. GAM is the more profitable business, keeping 97.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TRI's 19.9%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $252M | $7.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $105,782 | $3.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $202M | $1.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +53.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +97.5% | +28.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +97.5% | +19.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +22.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +8.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.8% | +7.6% |
Valuation Metrics
GAM leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.0x trailing earnings, GAM trades at a 78% valuation discount to TRI's 27.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GAM's 6.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TRI's 14.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $40.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $41.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.98x | 26.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 20.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.60x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.13x | 14.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.98x | 5.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.91x | 3.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 19.50x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GAM leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRI delivers a 12.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $12 for GAM. GAM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRI's 0.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRI scores 6/9 vs GAM's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.0% | +12.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.9% | +8.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.4% | +11.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.3% | +13.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $1.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $69,600 | $511M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $2.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 18.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GAM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GAM five years ago would be worth $19,537 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,570 for TRI. Over the past 12 months, GAM leads with a +38.0% total return vs TRI's -50.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GAM at 25.6% vs TRI's -6.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.8% | -28.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +38.0% | -50.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +98.1% | -19.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.4% | +5.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +193.8% | +153.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.6% | -6.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GAM and TRI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TRI is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GAM's 0.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GAM currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs TRI's 41.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 0.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $66.18 | $221.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $51.22 | $79.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.6% | +41.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.6 | 56.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 29K | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
TRI is the only dividend payer here at 2.55% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $147.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.34 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.5% |
GAM leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
GAM vs TRI: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GAM or TRI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, General American Investors Company, Inc.
(GAM) is the stronger pick with 180. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 8% for Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI). General American Investors Company, Inc. (GAM) offers the better valuation at 6. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GAM or TRI?
On trailing P/E, General American Investors Company, Inc.
(GAM) is the cheapest at 6. 0x versus Thomson Reuters Corporation at 27. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GAM or TRI?
Over the past 5 years, General American Investors Company, Inc.
(GAM) delivered a total return of +95. 4%, compared to +5. 7% for Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GAM returned +193. 8% versus TRI's +153. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GAM or TRI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
38β versus General American Investors Company, Inc. 's 0. 74β — meaning GAM is approximately 96% more volatile than TRI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, General American Investors Company, Inc. (GAM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 18% for Thomson Reuters Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GAM or TRI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), General American Investors Company, Inc.
(GAM) is pulling ahead at 180. 6% versus 4. 8% for Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Thomson Reuters Corporation grew EPS -30. 5% year-over-year, compared to -36. 1% for General American Investors Company, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GAM or TRI?
General American Investors Company, Inc.
(GAM) is the more profitable company, earning 97. 5% net margin versus 20. 1% for Thomson Reuters Corporation — meaning it keeps 97. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GAM leads at 97. 5% versus 26. 3% for TRI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GAM leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — GAM or TRI?
In this comparison, TRI (2.
6% yield) pays a dividend. GAM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is GAM or TRI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
38), 2. 6% yield, +153. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRI: +153. 1%, GAM: +193. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between GAM and TRI?
These companies operate in different sectors (GAM (Financial Services) and TRI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GAM is a small-cap high-growth stock; TRI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. TRI pays a dividend while GAM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.