Rental & Leasing Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
GATX vs WAB vs RAIL vs GNSS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Railroads
Railroads
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
GATX vs WAB vs RAIL vs GNSS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Rental & Leasing Services | Railroads | Railroads | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $6.51B | $45.09B | $254M | $90M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.90B | $11.51B | $469M | $51M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $340M | $1.21B | $29M | $-15M |
| Gross Margin | 33.6% | 33.8% | 14.8% | 43.2% |
| Operating Margin | 25.2% | 16.1% | 6.3% | -22.1% |
| Forward P/E | 18.3x | 25.0x | 16.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $12.81B | $5.54B | $152M | $21M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4.98B | $789M | $64M | $8M |
GATX vs WAB vs RAIL vs GNSS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| GATX Corporation (GATX) | 100 | 291.9 | +191.9% |
| Westinghouse Air Br… (WAB) | 100 | 435.1 | +335.1% |
| FreightCar America,… (RAIL) | 100 | 665.0 | +565.0% |
| Genasys Inc. (GNSS) | 100 | 43.7 | -56.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GATX vs WAB vs RAIL vs GNSS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GATX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.71, yield 1.4%
- 359.5% 10Y total return vs WAB's 247.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, current ratio 1.27x
- PEG 0.83 vs WAB's 0.97
WAB is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +40.6% vs GNSS's +2.6%
RAIL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and efficiency is your priority.
- Better valuation composite
- 9.4% ROA vs GNSS's -22.0%
GNSS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 69.8%, EPS growth 44.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -9.0%
- 69.8% revenue growth vs RAIL's -10.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 69.8% revenue growth vs RAIL's -10.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.9% margin vs GNSS's -29.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs RAIL's 2.06 | |
| Dividends | 1.4% yield, 19-year raise streak, vs WAB's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +40.6% vs GNSS's +2.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.4% ROA vs GNSS's -22.0% |
GATX vs WAB vs RAIL vs GNSS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GATX vs WAB vs RAIL vs GNSS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WAB leads in 2 of 6 categories
GNSS leads 1 • RAIL leads 1 • GATX leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GNSS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WAB is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.5B annually — 226.2x GNSS's $51M. GATX is the more profitable business, keeping 17.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GNSS's -29.2%. On growth, GNSS holds the edge at +145.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $11.5B | $469M | $51M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $823M | $2.3B | $34M | -$9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $340M | $1.2B | $29M | -$15M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$297M | $1.6B | $14M | -$3M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.6% | +33.8% | +14.8% | +43.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.2% | +16.1% | +6.3% | -22.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.9% | +10.5% | +6.2% | -29.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -15.6% | +14.3% | +3.1% | -5.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.4% | +13.0% | -33.2% | +145.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.3% | +12.8% | -24.3% | +78.0% |
Valuation Metrics
RAIL leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.3x trailing earnings, RAIL trades at a 81% valuation discount to WAB's 38.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GATX offers better value at 1.19x vs WAB's 1.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.5B | $45.1B | $254M | $90M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14.3B | $49.8B | $342M | $104M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.08x | 38.90x | 7.32x | -5.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.28x | 25.05x | 16.29x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.19x | 1.51x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.52x | 21.03x | 8.52x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.74x | 4.04x | 0.51x | 2.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.80x | 4.06x | — | 41.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 30.08x | 8.08x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
WAB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WAB delivers a 10.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-8 for GNSS. WAB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.50x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GNSS's 9.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RAIL scores 6/9 vs GNSS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.7% | +10.9% | — | -8.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.2% | +5.6% | +9.4% | -22.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.7% | +9.6% | — | -56.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.1% | +11.7% | +19.5% | -68.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.52x | 0.50x | — | 9.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7.8B | $4.8B | $88M | $13M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5.0B | $789M | $64M | $8M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12.8B | $5.5B | $152M | $21M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.04x | 7.41x | -0.57x | -31.66x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WAB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WAB five years ago would be worth $32,899 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,328 for GNSS. Over the past 12 months, WAB leads with a +40.6% total return vs GNSS's +2.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RAIL at 40.7% vs GNSS's -11.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.6% | +23.0% | -27.0% | -8.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +28.5% | +40.6% | +30.8% | +2.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +68.4% | +170.1% | +178.5% | -31.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +87.5% | +229.0% | +24.9% | -66.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +359.5% | +247.1% | -37.0% | +14.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.0% | +39.3% | +40.7% | -11.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GATX and WAB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GATX is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RAIL's 2.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAB currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs RAIL's 53.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.71x | 1.11x | 2.06x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $205.56 | $275.84 | $14.90 | $2.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $143.46 | $184.26 | $6.02 | $1.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.1% | +96.3% | +53.6% | +74.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.4 | 58.7 | 36.1 | 59.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 188K | 905K | 198K | 95K |
Analyst Outlook
GATX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GATX as "Buy", WAB as "Buy", RAIL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 15.8% upside for GATX (target: $212) vs 9.5% for WAB (target: $291). For income investors, GATX offers the higher dividend yield at 1.37% vs WAB's 0.38%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $212.00 | $291.00 | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 34 | 13 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.4% | +0.4% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 19 | 6 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.51 | $1.01 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | +0.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
WAB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). GNSS leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
GATX vs WAB vs RAIL vs GNSS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GATX or WAB or RAIL or GNSS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Genasys Inc.
(GNSS) is the stronger pick with 69. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 4% for FreightCar America, Inc. (RAIL). FreightCar America, Inc. (RAIL) offers the better valuation at 7. 3x trailing P/E (16. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GATX Corporation (GATX) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GATX or WAB or RAIL or GNSS?
On trailing P/E, FreightCar America, Inc.
(RAIL) is the cheapest at 7. 3x versus Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation at 38. 9x. On forward P/E, FreightCar America, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: GATX Corporation wins at 0. 83x versus Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation's 0. 97x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GATX or WAB or RAIL or GNSS?
Over the past 5 years, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) delivered a total return of +229.
0%, compared to -66. 7% for Genasys Inc. (GNSS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GATX returned +359. 5% versus RAIL's -37. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GATX or WAB or RAIL or GNSS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), GATX Corporation (GATX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
71β versus FreightCar America, Inc. 's 2. 06β — meaning RAIL is approximately 191% more volatile than GATX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 50% versus 10% for Genasys Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GATX or WAB or RAIL or GNSS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Genasys Inc.
(GNSS) is pulling ahead at 69. 8% versus -10. 4% for FreightCar America, Inc. (RAIL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FreightCar America, Inc. grew EPS 134. 9% year-over-year, compared to 13. 1% for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, RAIL leads at 11. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GATX or WAB or RAIL or GNSS?
GATX Corporation (GATX) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
2% net margin versus -44. 4% for Genasys Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GATX leads at 30. 7% versus -41. 2% for GNSS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GATX leads at 48. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GATX or WAB or RAIL or GNSS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, GATX Corporation (GATX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 83x versus Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation's 0. 97x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, FreightCar America, Inc. (RAIL) trades at 16. 3x forward P/E versus 25. 0x for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation — 8. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GATX: 15. 8% to $212. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GATX or WAB or RAIL or GNSS?
In this comparison, GATX (1.
4% yield), WAB (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. RAIL, GNSS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GATX or WAB or RAIL or GNSS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, GATX Corporation (GATX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
71), 1. 4% yield, +359. 5% 10Y return). FreightCar America, Inc. (RAIL) carries a higher beta of 2. 06 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GATX: +359. 5%, RAIL: -37. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GATX and WAB and RAIL and GNSS?
These companies operate in different sectors (GATX (Industrials) and WAB (Industrials) and RAIL (Industrials) and GNSS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GATX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WAB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; RAIL is a small-cap deep-value stock; GNSS is a small-cap high-growth stock. GATX pays a dividend while WAB, RAIL, GNSS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.