Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
GCT vs SOS vs GLOB vs BTBT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Information Technology Services
Financial - Capital Markets
GCT vs SOS vs GLOB vs BTBT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Information Technology Services | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $1.63B | $3M | $1.80B | $589M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.38B | $346M | $2.48B | $164M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $148M | $-24M | $100M | $137M |
| Gross Margin | 23.4% | 3.7% | 34.6% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | 11.6% | -9.5% | 7.3% | 16.8% |
| Forward P/E | 10.9x | — | 6.6x | 9.2x |
| Total Debt | $469M | $0.00 | $410M | $14M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $380M | $237M | $142M | $95M |
GCT vs SOS vs GLOB vs BTBT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| GigaCloud Technolog… (GCT) | 100 | 292.4 | +192.4% |
| SOS Limited (SOS) | 100 | 1.2 | -98.8% |
| Globant S.A. (GLOB) | 100 | 19.4 | -80.6% |
| Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) | 100 | 123.6 | +23.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GCT vs SOS vs GLOB vs BTBT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GCT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 173.0% 10Y total return vs GLOB's 13.6%
- +209.5% vs SOS's -75.4%
SOS is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 2.01, current ratio 9.97x
GLOB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.60
- Lower volatility, beta 1.60, Low D/E 20.2%, current ratio 1.54x
- Lower P/E (6.6x vs 9.2x)
- Beta 1.60 vs BTBT's 3.37
BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
- 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs GCT's 11.1%
- 17.3% margin vs SOS's -7.0%
- 0.3% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs GCT's 11.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.6x vs 9.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.3% margin vs SOS's -7.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.60 vs BTBT's 3.37 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +209.5% vs SOS's -75.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.0% ROA vs SOS's -4.9%, ROIC 6.5% vs -9.5% |
GCT vs SOS vs GLOB vs BTBT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GCT vs SOS vs GLOB vs BTBT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GCT leads in 2 of 6 categories
BTBT leads 1 • GLOB leads 1 • SOS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GLOB is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 15.2x BTBT's $164M. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOS's -7.0%. On growth, SOS holds the edge at +48.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $346M | $2.5B | $164M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $165M | -$15M | $321M | $166M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $148M | -$24M | $100M | $137M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $150M | -$141.0B | $231M | -$448M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.4% | +3.7% | +34.6% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.6% | -9.5% | +7.3% | +16.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | -7.0% | +4.0% | +17.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | -407.3% | +9.3% | -65.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.2% | +48.1% | +0.4% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +52.9% | +33.3% | -28.4% | +2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SOS and GLOB each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.2x trailing earnings, BTBT trades at a 23% valuation discount to GCT's 11.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GLOB's 5.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GCT's 11.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $3M | $1.8B | $589M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.7B | -$234M | $2.1B | $508M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.93x | -0.25x | 11.01x | 9.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.89x | — | 6.57x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.52x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.24x | — | 5.34x | 8.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.27x | 0.01x | 0.75x | 3.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.37x | 0.01x | 0.90x | 0.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.94x | — | 8.17x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GCT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GCT delivers a 31.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-6 for SOS. BTBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GCT's 0.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTBT scores 6/9 vs SOS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +31.5% | -5.6% | +4.4% | +21.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.8% | -4.9% | +3.0% | +19.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.1% | -9.5% | +8.3% | +6.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.4% | -5.0% | +9.6% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.97x | — | 0.20x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $90M | -$237M | $268M | -$81M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $380M | $237M | $142M | $95M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $469M | $0 | $410M | $14M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 417.84x | — | 4.74x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GCT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GCT five years ago would be worth $27,304 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4 for SOS. Over the past 12 months, GCT leads with a +209.5% total return vs SOS's -75.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GCT at 101.2% vs SOS's -74.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.5% | -26.0% | -35.0% | -10.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +209.5% | -75.4% | -66.7% | -9.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +714.4% | -98.3% | -70.9% | -19.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.0% | -100.0% | -81.2% | -84.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.0% | -100.0% | +13.6% | -60.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +101.2% | -74.5% | -33.8% | -7.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GCT and GLOB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GLOB is the less volatile stock with a 1.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GCT currently trades 82.6% from its 52-week high vs SOS's 11.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.41x | 2.01x | 1.60x | 3.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $51.86 | $9.62 | $142.25 | $4.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.57 | $0.90 | $38.49 | $1.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.6% | +11.5% | +28.8% | +40.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.4 | 46.7 | 36.1 | 69.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 752K | 117K | 1.3M | 18.5M |
Analyst Outlook
GLOB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GCT as "Buy", GLOB as "Buy", BTBT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 173.2% upside for BTBT (target: $5) vs -24.1% for GCT (target: $33). BTBT is the only dividend payer here at 0.31% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $32.50 | — | $63.83 | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | — | 28 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.1% | 0.0% | +0.6% | 0.0% |
GCT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). BTBT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
GCT vs SOS vs GLOB vs BTBT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GCT or SOS or GLOB or BTBT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 11. 1% for GigaCloud Technology Inc. (GCT). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GigaCloud Technology Inc. (GCT) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GCT or SOS or GLOB or BTBT?
On trailing P/E, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the cheapest at 9. 2x versus GigaCloud Technology Inc. at 11. 9x. On forward P/E, Globant S. A. is actually cheaper at 6. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GCT or SOS or GLOB or BTBT?
Over the past 5 years, GigaCloud Technology Inc.
(GCT) delivered a total return of +173. 0%, compared to -100. 0% for SOS Limited (SOS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GCT returned +173. 0% versus SOS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GCT or SOS or GLOB or BTBT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Globant S.
A. (GLOB) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 60β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 37β — meaning BTBT is approximately 111% more volatile than GLOB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 97% for GigaCloud Technology Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GCT or SOS or GLOB or BTBT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus 11. 1% for GigaCloud Technology Inc. (GCT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -82. 3% for SOS Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, GCT leads at 38. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GCT or SOS or GLOB or BTBT?
Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus -5. 9% for SOS Limited — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTBT leads at 16. 8% versus -9. 3% for SOS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BTBT leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GCT or SOS or GLOB or BTBT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Globant S.
A. (GLOB) trades at 6. 6x forward P/E versus 10. 9x for GigaCloud Technology Inc. — 4. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BTBT: 173. 2% to $5. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GCT or SOS or GLOB or BTBT?
In this comparison, BTBT (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. GCT, SOS, GLOB do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GCT or SOS or GLOB or BTBT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Globant S.
A. (GLOB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. SOS Limited (SOS) carries a higher beta of 2. 01 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GLOB: +13. 6%, SOS: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GCT and SOS and GLOB and BTBT?
These companies operate in different sectors (GCT (Technology) and SOS (Technology) and GLOB (Technology) and BTBT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GCT is a small-cap deep-value stock; SOS is a small-cap high-growth stock; GLOB is a small-cap high-growth stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.