Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GCTK vs DXCM vs PODD vs TNDM vs SENS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
Medical - Devices
Medical - Devices
Medical - Devices
GCTK vs DXCM vs PODD vs TNDM vs SENS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices | Medical - Devices | Medical - Devices | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $773K | $23.50B | $11.26B | $1.27B | $224M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $4.82B | $2.90B | $1.03B | $42M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-27M | $930M | $303M | $-95M | $-88M |
| Gross Margin | — | 61.8% | 71.0% | 54.9% | 52.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 21.4% | 17.5% | -7.9% | -204.4% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | 24.5x | 25.2x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $267K | $1.39B | $1.05B | $444M | $41M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $918M | $716M | $91M | $41M |
GCTK vs DXCM vs PODD vs TNDM vs SENS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| GlucoTrack, Inc. (GCTK) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| DexCom, Inc. (DXCM) | 100 | 64.4 | -35.6% |
| Insulet Corporation (PODD) | 100 | 85.1 | -14.9% |
| Tandem Diabetes Car… (TNDM) | 100 | 22.2 | -77.8% |
| Senseonics Holdings… (SENS) | 100 | 57.4 | -42.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GCTK vs DXCM vs PODD vs TNDM vs SENS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GCTK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Better valuation composite
DXCM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- 19.3% margin vs SENS's -208.1%
- 13.4% ROA vs GCTK's -262.2%
PODD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.68
- 439.0% 10Y total return vs DXCM's 290.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.68, Low D/E 69.4%, current ratio 2.78x
- PEG 0.24 vs DXCM's 2.34
TNDM is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- -17.0% vs GCTK's -91.5%
SENS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 56.9%, EPS growth 33.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.1%
- 56.9% revenue growth vs GCTK's -122.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 56.9% revenue growth vs GCTK's -122.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.3% margin vs SENS's -208.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.68 vs SENS's 2.07 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -17.0% vs GCTK's -91.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.4% ROA vs GCTK's -262.2% |
GCTK vs DXCM vs PODD vs TNDM vs SENS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
GCTK vs DXCM vs PODD vs TNDM vs SENS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DXCM leads in 2 of 6 categories
TNDM leads 1 • GCTK leads 0 • PODD leads 0 • SENS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DXCM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DXCM and GCTK operate at a comparable scale, with $4.8B and $0 in trailing revenue. DXCM is the more profitable business, keeping 19.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SENS's -2.1%. On growth, SENS holds the edge at +87.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $4.8B | $2.9B | $1.0B | $42M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$15M | $1.2B | $582M | -$68M | -$84M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$27M | $930M | $303M | -$95M | -$88M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$14M | $1.4B | $416M | -$4M | -$81M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +61.8% | +71.0% | +54.9% | +52.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +21.4% | +17.5% | -7.9% | -2.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +19.3% | +10.4% | -9.2% | -2.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +29.7% | +14.3% | -0.4% | -190.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +15.0% | +33.9% | +5.5% | +87.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +41.3% | +88.9% | +160.0% | +84.8% | -77.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — DXCM and PODD and TNDM each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.0x trailing earnings, GCTK trades at a 100% valuation discount to PODD's 46.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PODD offers better value at 0.45x vs DXCM's 2.78x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $773,493 | $23.5B | $11.3B | $1.3B | $224M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$5M | $24.0B | $11.6B | $1.6B | $225M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.01x | 29.14x | 46.09x | -6.08x | -3.23x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 24.47x | 25.23x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.78x | 0.45x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 20.60x | 19.76x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 5.04x | 4.16x | 1.25x | 6.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 8.99x | 7.61x | 8.01x | 3.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 21.82x | 29.81x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
DXCM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DXCM delivers a 33.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $-4 for GCTK. DXCM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.51x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TNDM's 2.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DXCM scores 8/9 vs GCTK's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.9% | +33.8% | +21.4% | -68.3% | -131.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.6% | +13.4% | +9.6% | -10.0% | -67.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +18.7% | +20.1% | -10.0% | -3.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.6% | +23.5% | +18.7% | -11.5% | -83.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.51x | 0.69x | 2.86x | 0.68x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | $472M | $335M | $354M | $822,000 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $918M | $716M | $91M | $41M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $267,000 | $1.4B | $1.1B | $444M | $41M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -13.49x | 57.21x | 7.39x | -15.99x | -4.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TNDM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PODD five years ago would be worth $6,849 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for GCTK. Over the past 12 months, TNDM leads with a -17.0% total return vs GCTK's -91.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TNDM at -18.0% vs GCTK's -93.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -77.8% | -8.5% | -43.3% | -14.3% | -9.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -91.5% | -26.9% | -39.3% | -17.0% | -61.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -49.3% | -49.7% | -44.8% | -60.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -32.1% | -31.5% | -78.0% | -85.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +290.2% | +439.0% | -75.4% | -91.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -93.2% | -20.3% | -20.5% | -18.0% | -26.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DXCM and PODD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PODD is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SENS's 2.07 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DXCM currently trades 67.7% from its 52-week high vs GCTK's 5.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.37x | 1.06x | 0.68x | 1.45x | 2.07x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.90 | $89.98 | $354.88 | $29.65 | $14.96 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.62 | $54.11 | $148.31 | $9.98 | $4.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +5.4% | +67.7% | +45.2% | +62.3% | +35.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.7 | 43.6 | 22.4 | 39.1 | 34.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.3M | 3.9M | 1.1M | 1.8M | 625K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DXCM as "Buy", PODD as "Buy", TNDM as "Buy", SENS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 111.3% upside for PODD (target: $339) vs 32.8% for DXCM (target: $81).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $80.88 | $339.00 | $31.62 | $9.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 52 | 50 | 39 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.1% | +0.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
DXCM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TNDM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
GCTK vs DXCM vs PODD vs TNDM vs SENS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GCTK or DXCM or PODD or TNDM or SENS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Senseonics Holdings, Inc.
(SENS) is the stronger pick with 56. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 9% for Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. (TNDM). GlucoTrack, Inc. (GCTK) offers the better valuation at 0. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DexCom, Inc. (DXCM) a "Buy" — based on 52 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GCTK or DXCM or PODD or TNDM or SENS?
On trailing P/E, GlucoTrack, Inc.
(GCTK) is the cheapest at 0. 0x versus Insulet Corporation at 46. 1x. On forward P/E, DexCom, Inc. is actually cheaper at 24. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Insulet Corporation wins at 0. 24x versus DexCom, Inc. 's 2. 34x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GCTK or DXCM or PODD or TNDM or SENS?
Over the past 5 years, Insulet Corporation (PODD) delivered a total return of -31.
5%, compared to -100. 0% for GlucoTrack, Inc. (GCTK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PODD returned +439. 0% versus GCTK's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GCTK or DXCM or PODD or TNDM or SENS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Insulet Corporation (PODD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
68β versus Senseonics Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 07β — meaning SENS is approximately 203% more volatile than PODD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DexCom, Inc. (DXCM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 51% versus 3% for Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GCTK or DXCM or PODD or TNDM or SENS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Senseonics Holdings, Inc.
(SENS) is pulling ahead at 56. 9% versus 7. 9% for Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. (TNDM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GlucoTrack, Inc. grew EPS 258. 6% year-over-year, compared to -106. 8% for Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SENS leads at 29. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GCTK or DXCM or PODD or TNDM or SENS?
DexCom, Inc.
(DXCM) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 9% net margin versus -196. 0% for Senseonics Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DXCM leads at 19. 6% versus -193. 8% for SENS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PODD leads at 71. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GCTK or DXCM or PODD or TNDM or SENS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Insulet Corporation (PODD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 24x versus DexCom, Inc. 's 2. 34x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, DexCom, Inc. (DXCM) trades at 24. 5x forward P/E versus 25. 2x for Insulet Corporation — 0. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PODD: 111. 3% to $339. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GCTK or DXCM or PODD or TNDM or SENS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is GCTK or DXCM or PODD or TNDM or SENS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Insulet Corporation (PODD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
68), +439. 0% 10Y return). Senseonics Holdings, Inc. (SENS) carries a higher beta of 2. 07 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PODD: +439. 0%, SENS: -91. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GCTK and DXCM and PODD and TNDM and SENS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GCTK is a small-cap deep-value stock; DXCM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PODD is a mid-cap high-growth stock; TNDM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SENS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.