Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GCTK vs DXCM vs PODD vs TNDM vs SENS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GCTK
GlucoTrack, Inc.

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$773K
5Y Perf.-100.0%
DXCM
DexCom, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$23.50B
5Y Perf.-35.6%
PODD
Insulet Corporation

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$11.26B
5Y Perf.-14.9%
TNDM
Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.27B
5Y Perf.-77.8%
SENS
Senseonics Holdings, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$224M
5Y Perf.-42.6%

GCTK vs DXCM vs PODD vs TNDM vs SENS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GCTK logoGCTK
DXCM logoDXCM
PODD logoPODD
TNDM logoTNDM
SENS logoSENS
IndustryMedical - Instruments & SuppliesMedical - DevicesMedical - DevicesMedical - DevicesMedical - Devices
Market Cap$773K$23.50B$11.26B$1.27B$224M
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$4.82B$2.90B$1.03B$42M
Net Income (TTM)$-27M$930M$303M$-95M$-88M
Gross Margin61.8%71.0%54.9%52.0%
Operating Margin21.4%17.5%-7.9%-204.4%
Forward P/E0.0x24.5x25.2x
Total Debt$267K$1.39B$1.05B$444M$41M
Cash & Equiv.$6M$918M$716M$91M$41M

GCTK vs DXCM vs PODD vs TNDM vs SENSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GCTK
DXCM
PODD
TNDM
SENS
StockMay 20May 26Return
GlucoTrack, Inc. (GCTK)1000.0-100.0%
DexCom, Inc. (DXCM)10064.4-35.6%
Insulet Corporation (PODD)10085.1-14.9%
Tandem Diabetes Car… (TNDM)10022.2-77.8%
Senseonics Holdings… (SENS)10057.4-42.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GCTK vs DXCM vs PODD vs TNDM vs SENS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: DXCM leads in 2 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. GlucoTrack, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. PODD, TNDM, and SENS also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
GCTK
GlucoTrack, Inc.
The Value Play

GCTK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.

  • Better valuation composite
Best for: value
DXCM
DexCom, Inc.
The Quality Compounder

DXCM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.

  • 19.3% margin vs SENS's -208.1%
  • 13.4% ROA vs GCTK's -262.2%
Best for: quality and efficiency
PODD
Insulet Corporation
The Income Pick

PODD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • beta 0.68
  • 439.0% 10Y total return vs DXCM's 290.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.68, Low D/E 69.4%, current ratio 2.78x
  • PEG 0.24 vs DXCM's 2.34
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
TNDM
Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

TNDM is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • -17.0% vs GCTK's -91.5%
Best for: momentum
SENS
Senseonics Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Play

SENS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 56.9%, EPS growth 33.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.1%
  • 56.9% revenue growth vs GCTK's -122.1%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSENS logoSENS56.9% revenue growth vs GCTK's -122.1%
ValueGCTK logoGCTKBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsDXCM logoDXCM19.3% margin vs SENS's -208.1%
Stability / SafetyPODD logoPODDBeta 0.68 vs SENS's 2.07
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)TNDM logoTNDM-17.0% vs GCTK's -91.5%
Efficiency (ROA)DXCM logoDXCM13.4% ROA vs GCTK's -262.2%

GCTK vs DXCM vs PODD vs TNDM vs SENS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GCTKGlucoTrack, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

DXCMDexCom, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

PODDInsulet Corporation
FY 2025
International Omnipod
98.7%$2.7B
Drug Delivery
1.3%$34M
TNDMTandem Diabetes Care, Inc.
FY 2025
Supplies and Other
54.3%$551M
Pump
45.7%$464M
SENSSenseonics Holdings, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

GCTK vs DXCM vs PODD vs TNDM vs SENS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLDXCMLAGGINGSENS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

DXCM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

DXCM and GCTK operate at a comparable scale, with $4.8B and $0 in trailing revenue. DXCM is the more profitable business, keeping 19.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SENS's -2.1%. On growth, SENS holds the edge at +87.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricGCTK logoGCTKGlucoTrack, Inc.DXCM logoDXCMDexCom, Inc.PODD logoPODDInsulet Corporati…TNDM logoTNDMTandem Diabetes C…SENS logoSENSSenseonics Holdin…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$4.8B$2.9B$1.0B$42M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$15M$1.2B$582M-$68M-$84M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$27M$930M$303M-$95M-$88M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$14M$1.4B$416M-$4M-$81M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+61.8%+71.0%+54.9%+52.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+21.4%+17.5%-7.9%-2.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+19.3%+10.4%-9.2%-2.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+29.7%+14.3%-0.4%-190.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+15.0%+33.9%+5.5%+87.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+41.3%+88.9%+160.0%+84.8%-77.5%
DXCM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — DXCM and PODD and TNDM each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 0.0x trailing earnings, GCTK trades at a 100% valuation discount to PODD's 46.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PODD offers better value at 0.45x vs DXCM's 2.78x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricGCTK logoGCTKGlucoTrack, Inc.DXCM logoDXCMDexCom, Inc.PODD logoPODDInsulet Corporati…TNDM logoTNDMTandem Diabetes C…SENS logoSENSSenseonics Holdin…
Market CapShares × price$773,493$23.5B$11.3B$1.3B$224M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$5M$24.0B$11.6B$1.6B$225M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS0.01x29.14x46.09x-6.08x-3.23x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.24.47x25.23x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.78x0.45x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple20.60x19.76x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue5.04x4.16x1.25x6.35x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share8.99x7.61x8.01x3.66x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF21.82x29.81x
Evenly matched — DXCM and PODD and TNDM each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

DXCM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

DXCM delivers a 33.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $-4 for GCTK. DXCM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.51x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TNDM's 2.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DXCM scores 8/9 vs GCTK's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricGCTK logoGCTKGlucoTrack, Inc.DXCM logoDXCMDexCom, Inc.PODD logoPODDInsulet Corporati…TNDM logoTNDMTandem Diabetes C…SENS logoSENSSenseonics Holdin…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-3.9%+33.8%+21.4%-68.3%-131.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-2.6%+13.4%+9.6%-10.0%-67.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+18.7%+20.1%-10.0%-3.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-3.6%+23.5%+18.7%-11.5%-83.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–928736
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.51x0.69x2.86x0.68x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$5M$472M$335M$354M$822,000
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$6M$918M$716M$91M$41M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$267,000$1.4B$1.1B$444M$41M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-13.49x57.21x7.39x-15.99x-4.38x
DXCM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TNDM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PODD five years ago would be worth $6,849 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for GCTK. Over the past 12 months, TNDM leads with a -17.0% total return vs GCTK's -91.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TNDM at -18.0% vs GCTK's -93.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGCTK logoGCTKGlucoTrack, Inc.DXCM logoDXCMDexCom, Inc.PODD logoPODDInsulet Corporati…TNDM logoTNDMTandem Diabetes C…SENS logoSENSSenseonics Holdin…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-77.8%-8.5%-43.3%-14.3%-9.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-91.5%-26.9%-39.3%-17.0%-61.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-49.3%-49.7%-44.8%-60.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-32.1%-31.5%-78.0%-85.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%+290.2%+439.0%-75.4%-91.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-93.2%-20.3%-20.5%-18.0%-26.4%
TNDM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — DXCM and PODD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

PODD is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SENS's 2.07 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DXCM currently trades 67.7% from its 52-week high vs GCTK's 5.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGCTK logoGCTKGlucoTrack, Inc.DXCM logoDXCMDexCom, Inc.PODD logoPODDInsulet Corporati…TNDM logoTNDMTandem Diabetes C…SENS logoSENSSenseonics Holdin…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.37x1.06x0.68x1.45x2.07x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$15.90$89.98$354.88$29.65$14.96
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.62$54.11$148.31$9.98$4.79
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+5.4%+67.7%+45.2%+62.3%+35.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10049.743.622.439.134.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded5.3M3.9M1.1M1.8M625K
Evenly matched — DXCM and PODD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: DXCM as "Buy", PODD as "Buy", TNDM as "Buy", SENS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 111.3% upside for PODD (target: $339) vs 32.8% for DXCM (target: $81).

MetricGCTK logoGCTKGlucoTrack, Inc.DXCM logoDXCMDexCom, Inc.PODD logoPODDInsulet Corporati…TNDM logoTNDMTandem Diabetes C…SENS logoSENSSenseonics Holdin…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$80.88$339.00$31.62$9.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts52503916
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+2.1%+0.5%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

DXCM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TNDM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallDexCom, Inc. (DXCM)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GCTK vs DXCM vs PODD vs TNDM vs SENS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GCTK or DXCM or PODD or TNDM or SENS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Senseonics Holdings, Inc.

(SENS) is the stronger pick with 56. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 9% for Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. (TNDM). GlucoTrack, Inc. (GCTK) offers the better valuation at 0. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DexCom, Inc. (DXCM) a "Buy" — based on 52 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — GCTK or DXCM or PODD or TNDM or SENS?

On trailing P/E, GlucoTrack, Inc.

(GCTK) is the cheapest at 0. 0x versus Insulet Corporation at 46. 1x. On forward P/E, DexCom, Inc. is actually cheaper at 24. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Insulet Corporation wins at 0. 24x versus DexCom, Inc. 's 2. 34x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — GCTK or DXCM or PODD or TNDM or SENS?

Over the past 5 years, Insulet Corporation (PODD) delivered a total return of -31.

5%, compared to -100. 0% for GlucoTrack, Inc. (GCTK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PODD returned +439. 0% versus GCTK's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — GCTK or DXCM or PODD or TNDM or SENS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Insulet Corporation (PODD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

68β versus Senseonics Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 07β — meaning SENS is approximately 203% more volatile than PODD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DexCom, Inc. (DXCM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 51% versus 3% for Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — GCTK or DXCM or PODD or TNDM or SENS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Senseonics Holdings, Inc.

(SENS) is pulling ahead at 56. 9% versus 7. 9% for Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. (TNDM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GlucoTrack, Inc. grew EPS 258. 6% year-over-year, compared to -106. 8% for Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SENS leads at 29. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — GCTK or DXCM or PODD or TNDM or SENS?

DexCom, Inc.

(DXCM) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 9% net margin versus -196. 0% for Senseonics Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DXCM leads at 19. 6% versus -193. 8% for SENS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PODD leads at 71. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is GCTK or DXCM or PODD or TNDM or SENS more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Insulet Corporation (PODD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 24x versus DexCom, Inc. 's 2. 34x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, DexCom, Inc. (DXCM) trades at 24. 5x forward P/E versus 25. 2x for Insulet Corporation — 0. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PODD: 111. 3% to $339. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — GCTK or DXCM or PODD or TNDM or SENS?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is GCTK or DXCM or PODD or TNDM or SENS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Insulet Corporation (PODD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

68), +439. 0% 10Y return). Senseonics Holdings, Inc. (SENS) carries a higher beta of 2. 07 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PODD: +439. 0%, SENS: -91. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between GCTK and DXCM and PODD and TNDM and SENS?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: GCTK is a small-cap deep-value stock; DXCM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PODD is a mid-cap high-growth stock; TNDM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SENS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

GCTK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DXCM

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PODD

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 16%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TNDM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 32%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SENS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 43%
  • Gross Margin > 31%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform GCTK and DXCM and PODD and TNDM and SENS on the metrics below

P/E Ratio<
x
(GCTK: 0.0x · DXCM: 29.1x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.