Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GCTK vs NXTC vs DXCM vs FATE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GCTK
GlucoTrack, Inc.

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$773K
5Y Perf.-100.0%
NXTC
NextCure, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$27M
5Y Perf.-97.3%
DXCM
DexCom, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$23.50B
5Y Perf.-35.6%
FATE
Fate Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$280M
5Y Perf.-92.5%

GCTK vs NXTC vs DXCM vs FATE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GCTK logoGCTK
NXTC logoNXTC
DXCM logoDXCM
FATE logoFATE
IndustryMedical - Instruments & SuppliesBiotechnologyMedical - DevicesBiotechnology
Market Cap$773K$27M$23.50B$280M
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$0.00$4.82B$7M
Net Income (TTM)$-27M$-55M$930M$-136M
Gross Margin61.8%
Operating Margin21.4%-22.2%
Forward P/E0.0x24.5x
Total Debt$267K$4M$1.39B$78M
Cash & Equiv.$6M$26M$918M$47M

GCTK vs NXTC vs DXCM vs FATELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GCTK
NXTC
DXCM
FATE
StockMay 20May 26Return
GlucoTrack, Inc. (GCTK)1000.0-100.0%
NextCure, Inc. (NXTC)1002.7-97.3%
DexCom, Inc. (DXCM)10064.4-35.6%
Fate Therapeutics, … (FATE)1007.5-92.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GCTK vs NXTC vs DXCM vs FATE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: DXCM leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. GlucoTrack, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. NXTC and FATE also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
GCTK
GlucoTrack, Inc.
The Value Play

GCTK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.

  • Better valuation composite
Best for: value
NXTC
NextCure, Inc.
The Income Pick

NXTC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • beta 0.61
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.61, Low D/E 11.9%, current ratio 4.14x
  • Beta 0.61, current ratio 4.14x
  • Beta 0.61 vs FATE's 2.17, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
DXCM
DexCom, Inc.
The Growth Play

DXCM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 15.6%, EPS growth 47.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.0%
  • 290.2% 10Y total return vs FATE's 40.5%
  • 15.6% revenue growth vs GCTK's -122.1%
  • 19.3% margin vs FATE's -20.5%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
FATE
Fate Therapeutics, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

FATE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +143.0% vs GCTK's -91.5%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthDXCM logoDXCM15.6% revenue growth vs GCTK's -122.1%
ValueGCTK logoGCTKBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsDXCM logoDXCM19.3% margin vs FATE's -20.5%
Stability / SafetyNXTC logoNXTCBeta 0.61 vs FATE's 2.17, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)FATE logoFATE+143.0% vs GCTK's -91.5%
Efficiency (ROA)DXCM logoDXCM13.4% ROA vs GCTK's -262.2%

GCTK vs NXTC vs DXCM vs FATE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GCTKGlucoTrack, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

NXTCNextCure, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

DXCMDexCom, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

FATEFate Therapeutics, Inc.
FY 2023
Upfront Fee And Equity Premium
100.0%$31M

GCTK vs NXTC vs DXCM vs FATE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLDXCMLAGGINGFATE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

DXCM leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

DXCM and NXTC operate at a comparable scale, with $4.8B and $0 in trailing revenue. DXCM is the more profitable business, keeping 19.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FATE's -20.5%. On growth, DXCM holds the edge at +15.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricGCTK logoGCTKGlucoTrack, Inc.NXTC logoNXTCNextCure, Inc.DXCM logoDXCMDexCom, Inc.FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$0$4.8B$7M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$15M-$55M$1.2B-$148M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$27M-$55M$930M-$136M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$14M-$50M$1.4B-$88M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+61.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+21.4%-22.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+19.3%-20.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+29.7%-13.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+15.0%-26.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+41.3%+60.2%+88.9%+38.6%
DXCM leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — NXTC and DXCM and FATE each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

At 0.0x trailing earnings, GCTK trades at a 100% valuation discount to DXCM's 29.1x P/E.

MetricGCTK logoGCTKGlucoTrack, Inc.NXTC logoNXTCNextCure, Inc.DXCM logoDXCMDexCom, Inc.FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…
Market CapShares × price$773,493$27M$23.5B$280M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$5M$5M$24.0B$312M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS0.01x-0.52x29.14x-2.11x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.24.47x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.78x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple20.60x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue5.04x42.18x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.83x8.99x1.39x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF21.82x
Evenly matched — NXTC and DXCM and FATE each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

DXCM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

DXCM delivers a 33.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $-4 for GCTK. NXTC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DXCM's 0.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DXCM scores 8/9 vs NXTC's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricGCTK logoGCTKGlucoTrack, Inc.NXTC logoNXTCNextCure, Inc.DXCM logoDXCMDexCom, Inc.FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-3.9%-187.0%+33.8%-65.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-2.6%-124.6%+13.4%-42.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-152.1%+18.7%-36.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-3.6%-103.9%+23.5%-43.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–92182
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.12x0.51x0.38x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$5M-$22M$472M$31M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$6M$26M$918M$47M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$267,000$4M$1.4B$78M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-13.49x57.21x
DXCM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — NXTC and DXCM and FATE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in DXCM five years ago would be worth $6,792 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for GCTK. Over the past 12 months, FATE leads with a +143.0% total return vs GCTK's -91.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NXTC at -19.4% vs GCTK's -93.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGCTK logoGCTKGlucoTrack, Inc.NXTC logoNXTCNextCure, Inc.DXCM logoDXCMDexCom, Inc.FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-77.8%-23.3%-8.5%+145.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-91.5%+123.2%-26.9%+143.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-47.6%-49.3%-55.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-89.3%-32.1%-96.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-95.7%+290.2%+40.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-93.2%-19.4%-20.3%-23.6%
Evenly matched — NXTC and DXCM and FATE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NXTC and FATE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NXTC is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FATE's 2.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FATE currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs GCTK's 5.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGCTK logoGCTKGlucoTrack, Inc.NXTC logoNXTCNextCure, Inc.DXCM logoDXCMDexCom, Inc.FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.37x0.61x1.06x2.17x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$15.90$15.74$89.98$2.46
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.62$4.09$54.11$0.91
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+5.4%+64.7%+67.7%+98.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10049.750.243.681.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded5.3M54K3.9M1.9M
Evenly matched — NXTC and FATE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: DXCM as "Buy", FATE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1525.5% upside for FATE (target: $40) vs 32.8% for DXCM (target: $81).

MetricGCTK logoGCTKGlucoTrack, Inc.NXTC logoNXTCNextCure, Inc.DXCM logoDXCMDexCom, Inc.FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$80.88$39.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts5231
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+2.1%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

DXCM leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.

Best OverallDexCom, Inc. (DXCM)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GCTK vs NXTC vs DXCM vs FATE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GCTK or NXTC or DXCM or FATE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, DexCom, Inc.

(DXCM) is the stronger pick with 15. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -51. 2% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). GlucoTrack, Inc. (GCTK) offers the better valuation at 0. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DexCom, Inc. (DXCM) a "Buy" — based on 52 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — GCTK or NXTC or DXCM or FATE?

On trailing P/E, GlucoTrack, Inc.

(GCTK) is the cheapest at 0. 0x versus DexCom, Inc. at 29. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — GCTK or NXTC or DXCM or FATE?

Over the past 5 years, DexCom, Inc.

(DXCM) delivered a total return of -32. 1%, compared to -100. 0% for GlucoTrack, Inc. (GCTK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DXCM returned +290. 2% versus GCTK's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — GCTK or NXTC or DXCM or FATE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NextCure, Inc.

(NXTC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 61β versus Fate Therapeutics, Inc. 's 2. 17β — meaning FATE is approximately 255% more volatile than NXTC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NextCure, Inc. (NXTC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 51% for DexCom, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — GCTK or NXTC or DXCM or FATE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), DexCom, Inc.

(DXCM) is pulling ahead at 15. 6% versus -51. 2% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GlucoTrack, Inc. grew EPS 258. 6% year-over-year, compared to 17. 7% for NextCure, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DXCM leads at 17. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — GCTK or NXTC or DXCM or FATE?

DexCom, Inc.

(DXCM) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 9% net margin versus -20. 5% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DXCM leads at 19. 6% versus -22. 2% for FATE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DXCM leads at 60. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is GCTK or NXTC or DXCM or FATE more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FATE: 1525.

5% to $39. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — GCTK or NXTC or DXCM or FATE?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is GCTK or NXTC or DXCM or FATE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, NextCure, Inc.

(NXTC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 61)). Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE) carries a higher beta of 2. 17 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NXTC: -95. 7%, FATE: +40. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between GCTK and NXTC and DXCM and FATE?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: GCTK is a small-cap deep-value stock; NXTC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DXCM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FATE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

GCTK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NXTC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DXCM

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FATE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.