Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
GCTK vs NXTC vs DXCM vs FATE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Medical - Devices
Biotechnology
GCTK vs NXTC vs DXCM vs FATE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Biotechnology | Medical - Devices | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $773K | $27M | $23.50B | $280M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $4.82B | $7M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-27M | $-55M | $930M | $-136M |
| Gross Margin | — | — | 61.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | 21.4% | -22.2% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | — | 24.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $267K | $4M | $1.39B | $78M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $26M | $918M | $47M |
GCTK vs NXTC vs DXCM vs FATE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| GlucoTrack, Inc. (GCTK) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| NextCure, Inc. (NXTC) | 100 | 2.7 | -97.3% |
| DexCom, Inc. (DXCM) | 100 | 64.4 | -35.6% |
| Fate Therapeutics, … (FATE) | 100 | 7.5 | -92.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GCTK vs NXTC vs DXCM vs FATE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GCTK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Better valuation composite
NXTC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.61
- Lower volatility, beta 0.61, Low D/E 11.9%, current ratio 4.14x
- Beta 0.61, current ratio 4.14x
- Beta 0.61 vs FATE's 2.17, lower leverage
DXCM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.6%, EPS growth 47.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.0%
- 290.2% 10Y total return vs FATE's 40.5%
- 15.6% revenue growth vs GCTK's -122.1%
- 19.3% margin vs FATE's -20.5%
FATE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +143.0% vs GCTK's -91.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.6% revenue growth vs GCTK's -122.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.3% margin vs FATE's -20.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.61 vs FATE's 2.17, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +143.0% vs GCTK's -91.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.4% ROA vs GCTK's -262.2% |
GCTK vs NXTC vs DXCM vs FATE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
GCTK vs NXTC vs DXCM vs FATE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DXCM leads in 2 of 6 categories
GCTK leads 0 • NXTC leads 0 • FATE leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DXCM leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DXCM and NXTC operate at a comparable scale, with $4.8B and $0 in trailing revenue. DXCM is the more profitable business, keeping 19.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FATE's -20.5%. On growth, DXCM holds the edge at +15.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 | $4.8B | $7M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$15M | -$55M | $1.2B | -$148M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$27M | -$55M | $930M | -$136M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$14M | -$50M | $1.4B | -$88M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — | +61.8% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — | +21.4% | -22.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — | +19.3% | -20.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — | +29.7% | -13.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +15.0% | -26.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +41.3% | +60.2% | +88.9% | +38.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NXTC and DXCM and FATE each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.0x trailing earnings, GCTK trades at a 100% valuation discount to DXCM's 29.1x P/E.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $773,493 | $27M | $23.5B | $280M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$5M | $5M | $24.0B | $312M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.01x | -0.52x | 29.14x | -2.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 24.47x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.78x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 20.60x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | 5.04x | 42.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.83x | 8.99x | 1.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 21.82x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
DXCM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DXCM delivers a 33.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $-4 for GCTK. NXTC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DXCM's 0.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DXCM scores 8/9 vs NXTC's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.9% | -187.0% | +33.8% | -65.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.6% | -124.6% | +13.4% | -42.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -152.1% | +18.7% | -36.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.6% | -103.9% | +23.5% | -43.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.12x | 0.51x | 0.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | -$22M | $472M | $31M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $26M | $918M | $47M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $267,000 | $4M | $1.4B | $78M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -13.49x | — | 57.21x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — NXTC and DXCM and FATE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DXCM five years ago would be worth $6,792 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for GCTK. Over the past 12 months, FATE leads with a +143.0% total return vs GCTK's -91.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NXTC at -19.4% vs GCTK's -93.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -77.8% | -23.3% | -8.5% | +145.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -91.5% | +123.2% | -26.9% | +143.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -47.6% | -49.3% | -55.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -89.3% | -32.1% | -96.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -95.7% | +290.2% | +40.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -93.2% | -19.4% | -20.3% | -23.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NXTC and FATE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NXTC is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FATE's 2.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FATE currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs GCTK's 5.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.37x | 0.61x | 1.06x | 2.17x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.90 | $15.74 | $89.98 | $2.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.62 | $4.09 | $54.11 | $0.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +5.4% | +64.7% | +67.7% | +98.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.7 | 50.2 | 43.6 | 81.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.3M | 54K | 3.9M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DXCM as "Buy", FATE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1525.5% upside for FATE (target: $40) vs 32.8% for DXCM (target: $81).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $80.88 | $39.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 52 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.1% | 0.0% |
DXCM leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
GCTK vs NXTC vs DXCM vs FATE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GCTK or NXTC or DXCM or FATE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DexCom, Inc.
(DXCM) is the stronger pick with 15. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -51. 2% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). GlucoTrack, Inc. (GCTK) offers the better valuation at 0. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DexCom, Inc. (DXCM) a "Buy" — based on 52 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GCTK or NXTC or DXCM or FATE?
On trailing P/E, GlucoTrack, Inc.
(GCTK) is the cheapest at 0. 0x versus DexCom, Inc. at 29. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GCTK or NXTC or DXCM or FATE?
Over the past 5 years, DexCom, Inc.
(DXCM) delivered a total return of -32. 1%, compared to -100. 0% for GlucoTrack, Inc. (GCTK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DXCM returned +290. 2% versus GCTK's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GCTK or NXTC or DXCM or FATE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NextCure, Inc.
(NXTC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 61β versus Fate Therapeutics, Inc. 's 2. 17β — meaning FATE is approximately 255% more volatile than NXTC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NextCure, Inc. (NXTC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 51% for DexCom, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GCTK or NXTC or DXCM or FATE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DexCom, Inc.
(DXCM) is pulling ahead at 15. 6% versus -51. 2% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GlucoTrack, Inc. grew EPS 258. 6% year-over-year, compared to 17. 7% for NextCure, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DXCM leads at 17. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GCTK or NXTC or DXCM or FATE?
DexCom, Inc.
(DXCM) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 9% net margin versus -20. 5% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DXCM leads at 19. 6% versus -22. 2% for FATE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DXCM leads at 60. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GCTK or NXTC or DXCM or FATE more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FATE: 1525.
5% to $39. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — GCTK or NXTC or DXCM or FATE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is GCTK or NXTC or DXCM or FATE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NextCure, Inc.
(NXTC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 61)). Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE) carries a higher beta of 2. 17 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NXTC: -95. 7%, FATE: +40. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GCTK and NXTC and DXCM and FATE?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GCTK is a small-cap deep-value stock; NXTC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DXCM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FATE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.