Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GDC vs IMTE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
GDC vs IMTE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $9M | $2M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $616K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $-21M |
| Gross Margin | — | -391.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | -12.9% |
| Total Debt | $2M | $11M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $23K | $676K |
GDC vs IMTE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| GD Culture Group Li… (GDC) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
| Integrated Media Te… (IMTE) | 100 | 1.5 | -98.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GDC vs IMTE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GDC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 100.0%, EPS growth 62.6%
- 100.0% revenue growth vs IMTE's 2.5%
- 0.3% margin vs IMTE's -33.3%
IMTE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.85
- -99.1% 10Y total return vs GDC's -99.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.85, Low D/E 45.8%, current ratio 1.55x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 100.0% revenue growth vs IMTE's 2.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.3% margin vs IMTE's -33.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.85 vs GDC's 3.04, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -55.5% vs GDC's -93.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.2% ROA vs IMTE's -43.7%, ROIC -198.9% vs -38.5% |
GDC vs IMTE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GDC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IMTE and GDC operate at a comparable scale, with $615,705 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $615,705 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | -$6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | -$21M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | $4M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | -3.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -12.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -33.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +6.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -71.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.3% | -3.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — GDC and IMTE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9M | $2M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11M | $12M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.10x | -0.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 4.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 547.10x | 0.05x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — GDC and IMTE each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GDC delivers a 3.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-61 for IMTE. IMTE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.46x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GDC's 769.88x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IMTE scores 5/9 vs GDC's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.3% | -61.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.2% | -43.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -198.9% | -38.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -188.0% | -58.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 769.88x | 0.46x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $10M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $22,538 | $675,781 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $11M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -22.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IMTE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMTE five years ago would be worth $121 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16 for GDC. Over the past 12 months, IMTE leads with a -55.5% total return vs GDC's -93.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IMTE at -51.4% vs GDC's -70.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -96.7% | -12.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -93.6% | -55.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.5% | -88.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | -98.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -99.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -70.9% | -51.4% |
Risk & Volatility
IMTE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IMTE is the less volatile stock with a 0.85 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GDC's 3.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMTE currently trades 34.4% from its 52-week high vs GDC's 1.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.04x | 0.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.91 | $1.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.14 | $0.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.5% | +34.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.4 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.4M | 274K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
IMTE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). GDC leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
GDC vs IMTE: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Which is the better long-term investment — GDC or IMTE?
Over the past 5 years, Integrated Media Technology Limited (IMTE) delivered a total return of -98.
8%, compared to -99. 8% for GD Culture Group Limited (GDC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMTE returned -99. 1% versus GDC's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
02Which is safer — GDC or IMTE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Integrated Media Technology Limited (IMTE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
85β versus GD Culture Group Limited's 3. 04β — meaning GDC is approximately 260% more volatile than IMTE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Integrated Media Technology Limited (IMTE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 46% versus 770% for GD Culture Group Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
03Which is growing faster — GDC or IMTE?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GD Culture Group Limited grew EPS 62.
6% year-over-year, compared to -691. 6% for Integrated Media Technology Limited. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
04Which has better profit margins — GDC or IMTE?
GD Culture Group Limited (GDC) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus -44. 8% for Integrated Media Technology Limited — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GDC leads at 0. 0% versus -58. 5% for IMTE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IMTE leads at 30. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — GDC or IMTE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is GDC or IMTE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Integrated Media Technology Limited (IMTE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
85)). GD Culture Group Limited (GDC) carries a higher beta of 3. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IMTE: -99. 1%, GDC: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between GDC and IMTE?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.