Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GEN vs CRWD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
GEN vs CRWD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $12.16B | $120.74B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.73B | $4.81B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $603M | $-183M |
| Gross Margin | 77.7% | 74.9% |
| Operating Margin | 36.9% | -5.4% |
| Forward P/E | 7.7x | 97.9x |
| Total Debt | $8.31B | $820M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.01B | $5.23B |
GEN vs CRWD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gen Digital Inc. (GEN) | 100 | 85.9 | -14.1% |
| CrowdStrike Holding… (CRWD) | 100 | 507.6 | +407.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GEN vs CRWD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GEN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.98, yield 2.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.98, current ratio 0.51x
- Beta 0.98, yield 2.5%, current ratio 0.51x
CRWD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 21.7%, EPS growth -7.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.0%
- 7.2% 10Y total return vs GEN's 116.9%
- 21.7% revenue growth vs GEN's 3.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.7% revenue growth vs GEN's 3.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.7x vs 97.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.8% margin vs CRWD's -3.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.98 vs CRWD's 1.35 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.5% vs GEN's -21.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.8% ROA vs CRWD's -1.9%, ROIC 12.4% vs -193.7% |
GEN vs CRWD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GEN vs CRWD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GEN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRWD and GEN operate at a comparable scale, with $4.8B and $4.7B in trailing revenue. GEN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRWD's -3.8%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.7B | $4.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.2B | $22M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $603M | -$183M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.5B | $1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +77.7% | +74.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +36.9% | -5.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.8% | -3.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +32.1% | +25.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.8% | +23.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.2% | +140.5% |
Valuation Metrics
GEN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, GEN's 9.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CRWD's 970.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.2B | $120.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $19.5B | $116.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.14x | -733.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.67x | 97.89x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 7.00x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.60x | 969.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.09x | 25.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.42x | 27.50x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.08x | 92.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GEN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GEN delivers a 25.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $26 in annual profit, vs $-5 for CRWD. CRWD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GEN's 3.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GEN scores 8/9 vs CRWD's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +25.9% | -4.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.8% | -1.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.4% | -193.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.5% | -2.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.66x | 0.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7.3B | -$4.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.0B | $5.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8.3B | $820M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.97x | -6.06x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CRWD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CRWD five years ago would be worth $24,660 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,457 for GEN. Over the past 12 months, CRWD leads with a +7.5% total return vs GEN's -21.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CRWD at 57.3% vs GEN's 7.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -23.9% | +5.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -21.6% | +7.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.7% | +289.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.6% | +146.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +116.9% | +721.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.3% | +57.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GEN and CRWD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GEN is the less volatile stock with a 0.98 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRWD's 1.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CRWD currently trades 84.1% from its 52-week high vs GEN's 61.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.98x | 1.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.22 | $566.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.78 | $342.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.2% | +84.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.3 | 63.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.2M | 3.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GEN as "Buy" and CRWD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 62.4% upside for GEN (target: $32) vs 10.9% for CRWD (target: $528). GEN is the only dividend payer here at 2.54% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $32.00 | $528.24 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 65 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.50 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.2% | 0.0% |
GEN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CRWD leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
GEN vs CRWD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GEN or CRWD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
(CRWD) is the stronger pick with 21. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 6% for Gen Digital Inc. (GEN). Gen Digital Inc. (GEN) offers the better valuation at 19. 1x trailing P/E (7. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gen Digital Inc. (GEN) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GEN or CRWD?
On forward P/E, Gen Digital Inc.
is actually cheaper at 7. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GEN or CRWD?
Over the past 5 years, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
(CRWD) delivered a total return of +146. 6%, compared to +4. 6% for Gen Digital Inc. (GEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRWD returned +721. 6% versus GEN's +115. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GEN or CRWD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gen Digital Inc.
(GEN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 98β versus CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 35β — meaning CRWD is approximately 38% more volatile than GEN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 4% for Gen Digital Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GEN or CRWD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
(CRWD) is pulling ahead at 21. 7% versus 3. 6% for Gen Digital Inc. (GEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Gen Digital Inc. grew EPS 8. 4% year-over-year, compared to -725. 9% for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CRWD leads at 29. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GEN or CRWD?
Gen Digital Inc.
(GEN) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 3% net margin versus -3. 4% for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GEN leads at 40. 9% versus -3. 4% for CRWD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GEN leads at 80. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GEN or CRWD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Gen Digital Inc.
(GEN) trades at 7. 7x forward P/E versus 97. 9x for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. — 90. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GEN: 62. 4% to $32. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GEN or CRWD?
In this comparison, GEN (2.
5% yield) pays a dividend. CRWD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GEN or CRWD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Gen Digital Inc.
(GEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 98), 2. 5% yield, +115. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GEN: +115. 9%, CRWD: +721. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GEN and CRWD?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GEN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CRWD is a mid-cap high-growth stock. GEN pays a dividend while CRWD does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.