GENI
Genius Sports Limited
Internet Content & Information
Market Cap$1.17B
5Y Perf.-52.6%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
GENI vs MGM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
MGM
MGM Resorts International
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Market Cap$9.75B
5Y Perf.+85.3%
GENI vs MGM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | GENI | MGM |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $1.17B | $9.75B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $669M | $17.72B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-112M | $183M |
| Gross Margin | 22.9% | 44.2% |
| Operating Margin | -18.1% | 5.2% |
| Forward P/E | 52.4x | 22.1x |
| Total Debt | $30M | $56.16B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $281M | $2.06B |
GENI vs MGM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
GENI
MGM
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Genius Sports Limit… (GENI) | 100 | 47.4 | -52.6% |
| MGM Resorts Interna… (MGM) | 100 | 185.3 | +85.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GENI vs MGM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: MGM leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Genius Sports Limited is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
GENI
Genius Sports Limited
The Income Pick
GENI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.50
- Rev growth 31.0%, EPS growth -63.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.50, Low D/E 4.2%, current ratio 1.56x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
MGM
MGM Resorts International
The Long-Run Compounder
MGM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and defensive.
- 81.8% 10Y total return vs GENI's -52.4%
- Beta 1.28, current ratio 1.23x
- Lower P/E (22.1x vs 52.4x)
Best for: long-term compounding and defensive
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | GENI | 31.0% revenue growth vs MGM's 1.7% |
| Value | MGM | Lower P/E (22.1x vs 52.4x) |
| Quality / Margins | MGM | 1.0% margin vs GENI's -16.7% |
| Stability / Safety | MGM | Beta 1.28 vs GENI's 1.50 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | MGM | +20.1% vs GENI's -53.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MGM | 0.4% ROA vs GENI's -11.1%, ROIC 1.7% vs -16.6% |
GENI vs MGM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
GENI vs MGM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLMGMLAGGINGGENI
GENIGenius Sports Limited
1leads
MGMMGM Resorts Internati…
5leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs GENIMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
MGM4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
MGM3/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
MGM6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
MGM4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
MGM2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
GENI1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGM is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.7B annually — 26.5x GENI's $669M. MGM is the more profitable business, keeping 1.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GENI's -16.7%. On growth, GENI holds the edge at +37.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | GENIGenius Sports Lim… | MGMMGM Resorts Inter… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $669M | $17.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$50M | $2.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$112M | $183M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $37M | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.9% | +44.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -18.1% | +5.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -16.7% | +1.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | +9.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +37.0% | +4.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.8% | -5.9% |
MGM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
MGM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | GENIGenius Sports Lim… | MGMMGM Resorts Inter… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $9.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $924M | $63.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -10.83x | 50.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 52.42x | 22.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 31.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.75x | 0.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.68x | 3.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.18x | 5.85x |
MGM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MGM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MGM delivers a 5.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-16 for GENI. GENI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MGM's 17.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MGM scores 5/9 vs GENI's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | GENIGenius Sports Lim… | MGMMGM Resorts Inter… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -15.5% | +5.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.1% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -16.6% | +1.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -15.3% | +2.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 17.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$250M | $54.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $281M | $2.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $30M | $56.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -136.57x | 1.52x |
MGM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MGM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MGM five years ago would be worth $9,551 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,536 for GENI. Over the past 12 months, MGM leads with a +20.1% total return vs GENI's -53.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GENI at 5.5% vs MGM's -4.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | GENIGenius Sports Lim… | MGMMGM Resorts Inter… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -55.8% | +4.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -53.1% | +20.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.4% | -12.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.6% | -4.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.4% | +81.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.5% | -4.3% |
MGM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MGM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MGM is the less volatile stock with a 1.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GENI's 1.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MGM currently trades 93.1% from its 52-week high vs GENI's 34.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | GENIGenius Sports Lim… | MGMMGM Resorts Inter… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.50x | 1.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.73 | $40.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.83 | $29.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +34.7% | +93.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.3 | 50.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.6M | 4.4M |
MGM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
GENI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GENI as "Buy" and MGM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 153.9% upside for GENI (target: $12) vs 4.2% for MGM (target: $40).
| Metric | GENIGenius Sports Lim… | MGMMGM Resorts Inter… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.10 | $39.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +12.6% |
GENI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
MGM leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). GENI leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook).
Best OverallMGM Resorts International (MGM)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
GENI vs MGM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GENI or MGM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Genius Sports Limited (GENI) is the stronger pick with 31.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 7% for MGM Resorts International (MGM). MGM Resorts International (MGM) offers the better valuation at 50. 1x trailing P/E (22. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Genius Sports Limited (GENI) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GENI or MGM?
On forward P/E, MGM Resorts International is actually cheaper at 22.
1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GENI or MGM?
Over the past 5 years, MGM Resorts International (MGM) delivered a total return of -4.
5%, compared to -74. 6% for Genius Sports Limited (GENI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MGM returned +81. 8% versus GENI's -52. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GENI or MGM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MGM Resorts International (MGM) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
28β versus Genius Sports Limited's 1. 50β — meaning GENI is approximately 18% more volatile than MGM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Genius Sports Limited (GENI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 17% for MGM Resorts International — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GENI or MGM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Genius Sports Limited (GENI) is pulling ahead at 31.
0% versus 1. 7% for MGM Resorts International (MGM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Genius Sports Limited grew EPS -63. 0% year-over-year, compared to -68. 3% for MGM Resorts International. Over a 3-year CAGR, GENI leads at 25. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GENI or MGM?
MGM Resorts International (MGM) is the more profitable company, earning 1.
2% net margin versus -16. 7% for Genius Sports Limited — meaning it keeps 1. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MGM leads at 5. 7% versus -15. 6% for GENI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MGM leads at 44. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GENI or MGM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, MGM Resorts International (MGM) trades at 22.
1x forward P/E versus 52. 4x for Genius Sports Limited — 30. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GENI: 153. 9% to $12. 10.
08Which pays a better dividend — GENI or MGM?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is GENI or MGM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MGM Resorts International (MGM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
28)). Genius Sports Limited (GENI) carries a higher beta of 1. 50 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MGM: +81. 8%, GENI: -52. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GENI and MGM?
These companies operate in different sectors (GENI (Communication Services) and MGM (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GENI is a small-cap high-growth stock; MGM is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 18%
- Gross Margin > 13%
Revenue Growth>
%
(GENI: 37.0% · MGM: 4.2%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.