GES vs GIII

For growth investors, Guess', Inc.

(GES) is the stronger pick with 7. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 0% for G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. (GIII). G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. (GIII) offers the better valuation at 20. 7x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. (GIII) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, G-III Apparel Group, Ltd.

(GIII) is the cheapest at 20. 7x versus Guess', Inc. at 21. 8x. On forward P/E, Guess', Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, G-III Apparel Group, Ltd.

(GIII) delivered a total return of -8. 7%, compared to -19. 5% for Guess', Inc. (GES). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GES returned +56. 6% versus GIII's -27. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Guess', Inc.

(GES) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. 's 1. 08β — meaning GIII is approximately 31% more volatile than GES relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. (GIII) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for Guess', Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Guess', Inc.

(GES) is pulling ahead at 7. 9% versus -7. 0% for G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. (GIII). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. grew EPS -64. 0% year-over-year, compared to -75. 1% for Guess', Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GES leads at 4. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

G-III Apparel Group, Ltd.

(GIII) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 3% net margin versus 2. 0% for Guess', Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GES leads at 5. 8% versus 5. 3% for GIII. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GES leads at 43. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Guess', Inc.

(GES) trades at 10. 4x forward P/E versus 10. 8x for G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. — 0. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GES: 55. 8% to $26. 19.

In this comparison, GES (5.

6% yield) pays a dividend. GIII does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Guess', Inc.

(GES) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 5. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GES: +56. 6%, GIII: -27. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: GES is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GIII is a small-cap quality compounder stock. GES pays a dividend while GIII does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.