Chemicals - Specialty
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
GEVO vs LIN vs BE vs PLUG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Electrical Equipment & Parts
GEVO vs LIN vs BE vs PLUG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $493M | $228.85B | $62.18B | $4.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $174M | $34.66B | $2.45B | $710M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $7.13B | $6M | $-1.63B |
| Gross Margin | 23.4% | 46.0% | 31.1% | 99.8% |
| Operating Margin | -4.6% | 28.8% | 8.2% | 38.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 27.7x | 123.6x | — |
| Total Debt | $168M | $26.99B | $2.99B | $997M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $5.06B | $2.45B | $1M |
GEVO vs LIN vs BE vs PLUG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gevo, Inc. (GEVO) | 100 | 157.4 | +57.4% |
| Linde plc (LIN) | 100 | 244.1 | +144.1% |
| Bloom Energy Corpor… (BE) | 100 | 3220.9 | +3120.9% |
| Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) | 100 | 74.3 | -25.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GEVO vs LIN vs BE vs PLUG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GEVO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 8.5%, EPS growth 58.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 415.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.64, Low D/E 35.6%, current ratio 1.82x
- 8.5% revenue growth vs LIN's 3.0%
LIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.24, yield 1.2%
- Beta 0.24, yield 1.2%, current ratio 0.88x
- Better valuation composite
- 20.6% margin vs PLUG's -229.8%
BE is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 9.3% 10Y total return vs LIN's 375.2%
- +14.6% vs LIN's +11.2%
PLUG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.5% revenue growth vs LIN's 3.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.6% margin vs PLUG's -229.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.24 vs BE's 3.61, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield; 6-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +14.6% vs LIN's +11.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.3% ROA vs PLUG's -64.3%, ROIC 11.3% vs 10.9% |
GEVO vs LIN vs BE vs PLUG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GEVO vs LIN vs BE vs PLUG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LIN leads in 4 of 6 categories
BE leads 1 • GEVO leads 0 • PLUG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — LIN and BE and PLUG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $34.7B annually — 198.7x GEVO's $174M. LIN is the more profitable business, keeping 20.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PLUG's -2.3%. On growth, BE holds the edge at +130.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $174M | $34.7B | $2.4B | $710M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $18M | $12.1B | $240M | -$1.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | $7.1B | $6M | -$1.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$35M | $5.1B | $233M | -$2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.4% | +46.0% | +31.1% | +99.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.6% | +28.8% | +8.2% | +38.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.6% | +20.6% | +0.2% | -2.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -19.9% | +14.7% | +9.5% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +47.5% | +8.2% | +130.4% | +17.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.8% | +13.4% | +3.3% | +95.9% |
Valuation Metrics
LIN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, LIN's 19.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BE's 508.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $493M | $228.8B | $62.2B | $4.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $659M | $250.8B | $62.7B | $5.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -14.50x | 33.85x | -699.03x | — |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 27.67x | 123.56x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.33x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 102.12x | 19.75x | 508.37x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.07x | 6.73x | 30.72x | 6.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.01x | 5.82x | 78.41x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 44.97x | 1087.24x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LIN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LIN delivers a 17.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-124 for PLUG. GEVO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLUG's 19.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LIN scores 6/9 vs BE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.4% | +17.8% | +0.8% | -124.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.7% | +8.3% | +0.2% | -64.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.8% | +11.3% | +4.1% | +10.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.1% | +13.0% | +2.5% | +18.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.36x | 0.68x | 3.77x | 19.75x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $166M | $21.9B | $538M | $996M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $5.1B | $2.5B | $1M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $168M | $27.0B | $3.0B | $997M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.04x | 34.52x | 1.05x | -36.18x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BE five years ago would be worth $111,339 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,358 for PLUG. Over the past 12 months, BE leads with a +1464.7% total return vs LIN's +11.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BE at 148.0% vs PLUG's -30.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.5% | +15.5% | +162.1% | +40.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +88.0% | +11.2% | +1464.7% | +303.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.0% | +39.7% | +1425.9% | -66.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.2% | +73.9% | +1013.4% | -86.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | +375.2% | +934.6% | +62.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.2% | +11.8% | +148.0% | -30.4% |
Risk & Volatility
LIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BE's 3.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LIN currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs PLUG's 68.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.64x | 0.24x | 3.61x | 2.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.97 | $521.28 | $302.99 | $4.58 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.01 | $387.78 | $16.18 | $0.69 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.4% | +94.7% | +85.4% | +68.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.5 | 51.7 | 72.6 | 63.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.5M | 2.3M | 10.1M | 76.5M |
Analyst Outlook
LIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GEVO as "Buy", LIN as "Buy", BE as "Buy", PLUG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 72.4% upside for GEVO (target: $4) vs -27.5% for BE (target: $188). LIN is the only dividend payer here at 1.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.50 | $539.71 | $187.56 | $3.91 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 28 | 31 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.2% | +0.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 6 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $6.00 | $0.00 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
LIN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). BE leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
GEVO vs LIN vs BE vs PLUG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GEVO or LIN or BE or PLUG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gevo, Inc.
(GEVO) is the stronger pick with 849. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 0% for Linde plc (LIN). Linde plc (LIN) offers the better valuation at 33. 8x trailing P/E (27. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gevo, Inc. (GEVO) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GEVO or LIN or BE or PLUG?
On forward P/E, Linde plc is actually cheaper at 27.
7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GEVO or LIN or BE or PLUG?
Over the past 5 years, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) delivered a total return of +1013%, compared to -86.
4% for Plug Power Inc. (PLUG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BE returned +934. 6% versus GEVO's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GEVO or LIN or BE or PLUG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Linde plc (LIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
24β versus Bloom Energy Corporation's 3. 61β — meaning BE is approximately 1401% more volatile than LIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gevo, Inc. (GEVO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 36% versus 20% for Plug Power Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GEVO or LIN or BE or PLUG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gevo, Inc.
(GEVO) is pulling ahead at 849. 3% versus 3. 0% for Linde plc (LIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Plug Power Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -184. 6% for Bloom Energy Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, GEVO leads at 415. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GEVO or LIN or BE or PLUG?
Linde plc (LIN) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
3% net margin versus -229. 8% for Plug Power Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLUG leads at 38. 1% versus -11. 7% for GEVO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLUG leads at 99. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GEVO or LIN or BE or PLUG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Linde plc (LIN) trades at 27.
7x forward P/E versus 123. 6x for Bloom Energy Corporation — 95. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GEVO: 72. 4% to $3. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — GEVO or LIN or BE or PLUG?
In this comparison, LIN (1.
2% yield) pays a dividend. GEVO, BE, PLUG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GEVO or LIN or BE or PLUG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Linde plc (LIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
24), 1. 2% yield, +375. 2% 10Y return). Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) carries a higher beta of 2. 57 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIN: +375. 2%, PLUG: +62. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GEVO and LIN and BE and PLUG?
These companies operate in different sectors (GEVO (Basic Materials) and LIN (Basic Materials) and BE (Industrials) and PLUG (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GEVO is a small-cap high-growth stock; LIN is a large-cap quality compounder stock; BE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PLUG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. LIN pays a dividend while GEVO, BE, PLUG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.