Conglomerates
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GFF vs MAS vs ALLE vs AWI vs TREX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Construction
Security & Protection Services
Construction
Construction
GFF vs MAS vs ALLE vs AWI vs TREX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Conglomerates | Construction | Security & Protection Services | Construction | Construction |
| Market Cap | $4.22B | $14.51B | $11.76B | $7.05B | $4.12B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.35B | $7.68B | $4.16B | $1.65B | $1.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $35M | $837M | $634M | $306M | $191M |
| Gross Margin | 42.6% | 35.4% | 45.0% | 40.3% | 39.2% |
| Operating Margin | 8.3% | 16.8% | 20.6% | 27.5% | 22.1% |
| Forward P/E | 17.3x | 16.9x | 15.6x | 19.9x | 24.0x |
| Total Debt | $1.59B | $3.44B | $2.28B | $532M | $229M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $99M | $647M | $356M | $113M | $4M |
GFF vs MAS vs ALLE vs AWI vs TREX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Griffon Corporation (GFF) | 100 | 580.8 | +480.8% |
| Masco Corporation (MAS) | 100 | 154.2 | +54.2% |
| Allegion plc (ALLE) | 100 | 137.2 | +37.2% |
| Armstrong World Ind… (AWI) | 100 | 219.0 | +119.0% |
| Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) | 100 | 65.2 | -34.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GFF vs MAS vs ALLE vs AWI vs TREX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GFF ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 5.6% 10Y total return vs AWI's 330.4%
- +34.7% vs TREX's -30.8%
MAS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.28, yield 1.7%
- 1.7% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs GFF's 0.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
ALLE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.67, current ratio 1.84x
- PEG 0.92 vs TREX's 7.16
- Beta 0.67, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.84x
- Lower P/E (15.6x vs 24.0x), PEG 0.92 vs 7.16
AWI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 12.1%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.5%
- 12.1% revenue growth vs GFF's -3.9%
- 18.6% margin vs GFF's 1.5%
- 16.0% ROA vs GFF's 1.7%, ROIC 24.9% vs 9.1%
Among these 5 stocks, TREX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.1% revenue growth vs GFF's -3.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.6x vs 24.0x), PEG 0.92 vs 7.16 | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.6% margin vs GFF's 1.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs TREX's 1.47 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs GFF's 0.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.7% vs TREX's -30.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.0% ROA vs GFF's 1.7%, ROIC 24.9% vs 9.1% |
GFF vs MAS vs ALLE vs AWI vs TREX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GFF vs MAS vs ALLE vs AWI vs TREX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ALLE leads in 1 of 6 categories
GFF leads 1 • MAS leads 1 • AWI leads 0 • TREX leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ALLE and AWI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAS is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.7B annually — 6.5x TREX's $1.2B. AWI is the more profitable business, keeping 18.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GFF's 1.5%. On growth, ALLE holds the edge at +9.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.3B | $7.7B | $4.2B | $1.6B | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $241M | $1.4B | $959M | $603M | $309M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $35M | $837M | $634M | $306M | $191M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $294M | $943M | $704M | $247M | $263M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +42.6% | +35.4% | +45.0% | +40.3% | +39.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.3% | +16.8% | +20.6% | +27.5% | +22.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | +10.9% | +15.2% | +18.6% | +16.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.5% | +12.3% | +16.9% | +15.0% | +22.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -31.0% | +6.5% | +9.7% | +7.1% | +1.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -65.3% | +20.7% | -7.0% | -1.9% | +3.6% |
Valuation Metrics
ALLE leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.4x trailing earnings, ALLE trades at a 78% valuation discount to GFF's 83.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ALLE offers better value at 1.08x vs TREX's 6.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.2B | $14.5B | $11.8B | $7.0B | $4.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.7B | $17.3B | $13.7B | $7.5B | $4.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 83.18x | 18.63x | 18.39x | 23.32x | 22.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.30x | 16.85x | 15.60x | 19.87x | 23.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.67x | 3.76x | 1.08x | — | 6.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.23x | 12.18x | 13.83x | 17.23x | 13.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.68x | 1.92x | 2.89x | 4.35x | 3.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 57.22x | 201.40x | 5.72x | 7.99x | 4.05x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.91x | 16.76x | 17.14x | 28.63x | 30.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — MAS and AWI and TREX each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MAS delivers a 8.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $19 for TREX. TREX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAS's 45.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AWI scores 9/9 vs TREX's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +40.8% | +8.0% | +32.1% | +34.8% | +18.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +15.9% | +12.3% | +16.0% | +12.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.1% | +35.4% | +18.1% | +24.9% | +16.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.0% | +35.9% | +20.8% | +26.5% | +23.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 9 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 21.52x | 45.81x | 1.10x | 0.59x | 0.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.5B | $2.8B | $1.9B | $419M | $225M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $99M | $647M | $356M | $113M | $4M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.6B | $3.4B | $2.3B | $532M | $229M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.30x | 12.60x | 8.61x | 13.31x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GFF leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GFF five years ago would be worth $36,532 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,599 for TREX. Over the past 12 months, GFF leads with a +34.7% total return vs TREX's -30.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GFF at 46.7% vs TREX's -11.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.1% | +12.1% | -14.6% | -16.0% | +9.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +34.7% | +21.1% | -1.0% | +11.5% | -30.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +215.8% | +40.1% | +32.6% | +151.8% | -30.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +265.3% | +16.1% | +3.2% | +63.0% | -64.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +558.1% | +152.1% | +127.3% | +330.4% | +239.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +46.7% | +11.9% | +9.9% | +36.0% | -11.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GFF and ALLE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALLE is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TREX's 1.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GFF currently trades 92.9% from its 52-week high vs TREX's 56.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.36x | 1.28x | 0.67x | 0.82x | 1.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $97.58 | $79.19 | $183.11 | $206.08 | $68.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $65.01 | $58.16 | $131.25 | $148.25 | $29.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.9% | +90.8% | +74.7% | +80.1% | +56.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.3 | 59.6 | 38.5 | 41.3 | 51.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 348K | 2.7M | 887K | 494K | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
MAS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GFF as "Buy", MAS as "Buy", ALLE as "Hold", AWI as "Buy", TREX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 26.1% upside for ALLE (target: $173) vs 13.6% for TREX (target: $45). For income investors, MAS offers the higher dividend yield at 1.73% vs AWI's 0.77%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $111.50 | $82.36 | $172.50 | $197.50 | $44.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 38 | 23 | 26 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | +1.7% | +1.5% | +0.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 12 | 12 | 8 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.85 | $1.24 | $2.03 | $1.27 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.3% | +3.9% | +0.7% | +1.8% | +1.3% |
ALLE leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). GFF leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
GFF vs MAS vs ALLE vs AWI vs TREX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GFF or MAS or ALLE or AWI or TREX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the stronger pick with 12. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 9% for Griffon Corporation (GFF). Allegion plc (ALLE) offers the better valuation at 18. 4x trailing P/E (15. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Griffon Corporation (GFF) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GFF or MAS or ALLE or AWI or TREX?
On trailing P/E, Allegion plc (ALLE) is the cheapest at 18.
4x versus Griffon Corporation at 83. 2x. On forward P/E, Allegion plc is actually cheaper at 15. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Allegion plc wins at 0. 92x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 16x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GFF or MAS or ALLE or AWI or TREX?
Over the past 5 years, Griffon Corporation (GFF) delivered a total return of +265.
3%, compared to -64. 0% for Trex Company, Inc. (TREX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GFF returned +558. 1% versus ALLE's +127. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GFF or MAS or ALLE or AWI or TREX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Allegion plc (ALLE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
67β versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 1. 47β — meaning TREX is approximately 121% more volatile than ALLE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 46% for Masco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GFF or MAS or ALLE or AWI or TREX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is pulling ahead at 12. 1% versus -3. 9% for Griffon Corporation (GFF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Armstrong World Industries, Inc. grew EPS 17. 6% year-over-year, compared to -74. 2% for Griffon Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AWI leads at 9. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GFF or MAS or ALLE or AWI or TREX?
Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 0% net margin versus 2. 0% for Griffon Corporation — meaning it keeps 19. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AWI leads at 26. 6% versus 8. 2% for GFF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALLE leads at 45. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GFF or MAS or ALLE or AWI or TREX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Allegion plc (ALLE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 92x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 16x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Allegion plc (ALLE) trades at 15. 6x forward P/E versus 24. 0x for Trex Company, Inc. — 8. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALLE: 26. 1% to $172. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — GFF or MAS or ALLE or AWI or TREX?
In this comparison, MAS (1.
7% yield), ALLE (1. 5% yield), GFF (0. 9% yield), AWI (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. TREX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GFF or MAS or ALLE or AWI or TREX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Allegion plc (ALLE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
67), 1. 5% yield, +127. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALLE: +127. 3%, TREX: +239. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GFF and MAS and ALLE and AWI and TREX?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
GFF, MAS, ALLE, AWI pay a dividend while TREX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.