Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
GGR vs BLDP vs PLUG vs CHPT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Specialty Retail
GGR vs BLDP vs PLUG vs CHPT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Industrial - Machinery | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $59M | $1.24B | $4.34B | $135M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $280M | $99M | $710M | $411M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-131M | $-91M | $-1.63B | $-220M |
| Gross Margin | 2.7% | 5.5% | 99.8% | 30.5% |
| Operating Margin | -43.3% | -104.7% | 38.1% | -51.1% |
| Total Debt | $393M | $22M | $997M | $272M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $117M | $526M | $1M | $142M |
GGR vs BLDP vs PLUG vs CHPT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gogoro Inc. (GGR) | 100 | 2.1 | -97.9% |
| Ballard Power Syste… (BLDP) | 100 | 17.0 | -83.0% |
| Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) | 100 | 8.7 | -91.3% |
| ChargePoint Holding… (CHPT) | 100 | 1.2 | -98.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GGR vs BLDP vs PLUG vs CHPT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GGR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.31
- -46.9% margin vs PLUG's -229.8%
- Beta 1.31 vs CHPT's 2.64, lower leverage
BLDP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 45.0%, EPS growth 72.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.5%
- 190.8% 10Y total return vs PLUG's 61.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.39, Low D/E 3.8%, current ratio 9.86x
- Beta 2.39, current ratio 9.86x
PLUG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +266.9% vs CHPT's -48.2%
CHPT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 45.0% revenue growth vs GGR's -11.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | -46.9% margin vs PLUG's -229.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.31 vs CHPT's 2.64, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +266.9% vs CHPT's -48.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -12.6% ROA vs PLUG's -64.3%, ROIC -68.8% vs 10.9% |
GGR vs BLDP vs PLUG vs CHPT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GGR vs BLDP vs PLUG vs CHPT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BLDP leads in 2 of 6 categories
PLUG leads 1 • GGR leads 1 • CHPT leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLUG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLUG is the larger business by revenue, generating $710M annually — 7.1x BLDP's $99M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -46.9% (GGR) to -2.3% (PLUG). On growth, BLDP holds the edge at +37.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $280M | $99M | $710M | $411M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$30M | -$100M | -$1.5B | -$180M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$131M | -$91M | -$1.6B | -$220M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$90M | -$66M | -$2M | -$67M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | +5.5% | +99.8% | +30.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -43.3% | -104.7% | +38.1% | -51.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -46.9% | -91.5% | -2.3% | -53.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -32.0% | -66.6% | -0.3% | -16.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.6% | +37.2% | +17.6% | +7.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.5% | +59.3% | +95.9% | +28.8% |
Valuation Metrics
GGR leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $59M | $1.2B | $4.3B | $135M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $335M | $739M | $5.3B | $265M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.44x | -13.77x | — | -0.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.19x | 12.29x | 6.12x | 0.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.30x | 2.13x | — | 6.86x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BLDP leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BLDP delivers a -14.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-15 in annual profit, vs $-4 for CHPT. BLDP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLUG's 19.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BLDP scores 5/9 vs GGR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -99.3% | -14.6% | -124.4% | -3.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -18.7% | -12.6% | -64.3% | -25.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -22.0% | -68.8% | +10.9% | -83.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -25.9% | -12.3% | +18.6% | -41.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.23x | 0.04x | 19.75x | 12.75x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $276M | -$504M | $996M | $130M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $117M | $526M | $1M | $142M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $393M | $22M | $997M | $272M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9.05x | -46.37x | -36.18x | -8.58x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BLDP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BLDP five years ago would be worth $2,872 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $146 for CHPT. Over the past 12 months, PLUG leads with a +266.9% total return vs CHPT's -48.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BLDP at -3.5% vs CHPT's -67.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +32.7% | +54.1% | +39.9% | -11.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -22.4% | +217.7% | +266.9% | -48.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.0% | -10.0% | -66.4% | -96.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.9% | -71.3% | -84.5% | -98.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.0% | +190.8% | +61.7% | -96.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -60.9% | -3.5% | -30.5% | -67.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GGR and BLDP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GGR is the less volatile stock with a 1.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHPT's 2.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BLDP currently trades 85.0% from its 52-week high vs CHPT's 35.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.31x | 2.39x | 2.55x | 2.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.30 | $4.86 | $4.58 | $17.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.72 | $1.21 | $0.69 | $4.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.4% | +85.0% | +68.1% | +35.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.5 | 77.7 | 56.2 | 49.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 12K | 4.6M | 75.2M | 479K |
Analyst Outlook
CHPT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BLDP as "Hold", PLUG as "Buy", CHPT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 25.3% upside for PLUG (target: $4) vs -20.3% for BLDP (target: $3).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $3.29 | $3.91 | $7.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 26 | 38 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BLDP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). PLUG leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
GGR vs BLDP vs PLUG vs CHPT: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GGR or BLDP or PLUG or CHPT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ballard Power Systems Inc.
(BLDP) is the stronger pick with 45. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 2% for Gogoro Inc. (GGR). Analysts rate Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GGR or BLDP or PLUG or CHPT?
Over the past 5 years, Ballard Power Systems Inc.
(BLDP) delivered a total return of -71. 3%, compared to -98. 5% for ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BLDP returned +190. 8% versus GGR's -98. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GGR or BLDP or PLUG or CHPT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gogoro Inc.
(GGR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 31β versus ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 64β — meaning CHPT is approximately 102% more volatile than GGR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ballard Power Systems Inc. (BLDP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 20% for Plug Power Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — GGR or BLDP or PLUG or CHPT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ballard Power Systems Inc.
(BLDP) is pulling ahead at 45. 0% versus -11. 2% for Gogoro Inc. (GGR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Plug Power Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -43. 8% for Gogoro Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BLDP leads at 6. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GGR or BLDP or PLUG or CHPT?
Gogoro Inc.
(GGR) is the more profitable company, earning -39. 5% net margin versus -229. 8% for Plug Power Inc. — meaning it keeps -39. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLUG leads at 38. 1% versus -80. 6% for BLDP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLUG leads at 99. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — GGR or BLDP or PLUG or CHPT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is GGR or BLDP or PLUG or CHPT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Gogoro Inc.
(GGR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT) carries a higher beta of 2. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GGR: -98. 0%, CHPT: -96. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between GGR and BLDP and PLUG and CHPT?
These companies operate in different sectors (GGR (Consumer Cyclical) and BLDP (Industrials) and PLUG (Industrials) and CHPT (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GGR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BLDP is a small-cap high-growth stock; PLUG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CHPT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.