REIT - Diversified
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
GIPR vs FCPT vs NTST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
GIPR vs FCPT vs NTST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $1M | $2.80B | $1.70B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10M | $301M | $176M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10M | $117M | $185K |
| Gross Margin | 74.1% | 98.0% | 92.4% |
| Operating Margin | -66.7% | 56.0% | 27.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 21.8x | 64.8x |
| Total Debt | $70M | $1.21B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $613K | $12M | $14M |
GIPR vs FCPT vs NTST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Generation Income P… (GIPR) | 100 | 3.7 | -96.3% |
| Four Corners Proper… (FCPT) | 100 | 87.8 | -12.2% |
| NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) | 100 | 84.0 | -16.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GIPR vs FCPT vs NTST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GIPR is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.73, yield 100.0%, current ratio 1.15x
- 100.0% yield, vs FCPT's 5.5%
FCPT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.14, yield 5.5%
- 99.1% 10Y total return vs NTST's 40.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.14, Low D/E 74.2%, current ratio 0.30x
NTST is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 30.0%, EPS growth 150.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.2%
- 30.0% FFO/revenue growth vs FCPT's 9.7%
- Beta 0.05 vs GIPR's 1.73
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.0% FFO/revenue growth vs FCPT's 9.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 38.7% margin vs GIPR's -103.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs GIPR's 1.73 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, vs FCPT's 5.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.6% vs GIPR's -83.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.1% ROA vs GIPR's -9.5%, ROIC 4.5% vs -4.0% |
GIPR vs FCPT vs NTST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GIPR vs FCPT vs NTST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FCPT leads in 2 of 6 categories
NTST leads 2 • GIPR leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FCPT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FCPT is the larger business by revenue, generating $301M annually — 30.2x GIPR's $10M. FCPT is the more profitable business, keeping 38.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GIPR's -103.2%. On growth, NTST holds the edge at +27.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $301M | $176M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | $231M | $133M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10M | $117M | $185,000 |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $654,400 | $188M | $106M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +74.1% | +98.0% | +92.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -66.7% | +56.0% | +27.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -103.2% | +38.7% | +0.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.6% | +62.5% | +59.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.9% | +9.4% | +27.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.5% | +7.7% | +110.6% |
Valuation Metrics
GIPR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.4x trailing earnings, FCPT trades at a 91% valuation discount to NTST's 254.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NTST offers better value at 4.35x vs FCPT's 118.24x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $2.8B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $71M | $4.0B | $1.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.17x | 23.37x | 254.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 21.81x | 64.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 118.24x | 4.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 17.81x | 12.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.15x | 9.51x | 8.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.04x | 1.61x | 1.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.39x | 14.54x | 15.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FCPT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FCPT delivers a 7.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-32 for GIPR. FCPT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.74x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GIPR's 2.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FCPT scores 7/9 vs GIPR's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -32.2% | +7.4% | +0.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.5% | +4.1% | +0.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.0% | +4.5% | +2.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.0% | +6.0% | +2.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.14x | 0.74x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $70M | $1.2B | -$14M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $612,939 | $12M | $14M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $70M | $1.2B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.20x | 3.17x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NTST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FCPT five years ago would be worth $11,715 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,333 for GIPR. Over the past 12 months, NTST leads with a +32.6% total return vs GIPR's -83.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTST at 8.3% vs GIPR's -42.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -60.4% | +11.2% | +15.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -83.8% | -3.0% | +32.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.0% | +14.0% | +27.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.7% | +17.2% | +14.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.3% | +99.1% | +40.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -42.5% | +4.5% | +8.3% |
Risk & Volatility
NTST leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NTST is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GIPR's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NTST currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs GIPR's 13.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.73x | 0.14x | 0.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.99 | $28.14 | $21.30 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.23 | $22.78 | $15.24 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +13.1% | +90.5% | +95.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.9 | 55.6 | 57.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 658K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GIPR and FCPT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FCPT as "Hold", NTST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.2% upside for NTST (target: $22) vs 6.0% for FCPT (target: $27). For income investors, GIPR offers the higher dividend yield at 99.97% vs NTST's 4.10%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $27.00 | $22.03 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +5.5% | +4.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 8 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.26 | $1.40 | $0.83 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% |
FCPT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NTST leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
GIPR vs FCPT vs NTST: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GIPR or FCPT or NTST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is the stronger pick with 30. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 7% for Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT). Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT) offers the better valuation at 23. 4x trailing P/E (21. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GIPR or FCPT or NTST?
On trailing P/E, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.
(FCPT) is the cheapest at 23. 4x versus NETSTREIT Corp. at 254. 5x. On forward P/E, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. is actually cheaper at 21. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NETSTREIT Corp. wins at 1. 11x versus Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. 's 118. 24x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GIPR or FCPT or NTST?
Over the past 5 years, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.
(FCPT) delivered a total return of +17. 2%, compared to -76. 7% for Generation Income Properties, Inc. (GIPR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FCPT returned +99. 1% versus GIPR's -56. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GIPR or FCPT or NTST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 05β versus Generation Income Properties, Inc. 's 1. 73β — meaning GIPR is approximately 3381% more volatile than NTST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 74% versus 2% for Generation Income Properties, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GIPR or FCPT or NTST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is pulling ahead at 30. 0% versus 9. 7% for Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NETSTREIT Corp. grew EPS 150. 0% year-over-year, compared to 1. 9% for Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GIPR leads at 35. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GIPR or FCPT or NTST?
Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.
(FCPT) is the more profitable company, earning 38. 2% net margin versus -85. 5% for Generation Income Properties, Inc. — meaning it keeps 38. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FCPT leads at 55. 7% versus -52. 6% for GIPR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTST leads at 99. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GIPR or FCPT or NTST more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 11x versus Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. 's 118. 24x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT) trades at 21. 8x forward P/E versus 64. 8x for NETSTREIT Corp. — 43. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NTST: 8. 2% to $22. 03.
08Which pays a better dividend — GIPR or FCPT or NTST?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Generation Income Properties, Inc. (GIPR) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 4. 1% for NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST).
09Is GIPR or FCPT or NTST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 05), 4. 1% yield). Generation Income Properties, Inc. (GIPR) carries a higher beta of 1. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTST: +40. 7%, GIPR: -56. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GIPR and FCPT and NTST?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GIPR is a small-cap high-growth stock; FCPT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NTST is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.