REIT - Diversified
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GIPR vs FCPT vs NTST vs PSTL vs LAND
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
REIT - Office
REIT - Industrial
GIPR vs FCPT vs NTST vs PSTL vs LAND — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail | REIT - Office | REIT - Industrial |
| Market Cap | $1M | $2.76B | $1.70B | $774M | $350M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10M | $301M | $176M | $96M | $76M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10M | $117M | $185K | $14M | $-10M |
| Gross Margin | 74.1% | 98.0% | 92.4% | 88.2% | 87.4% |
| Operating Margin | -66.7% | 56.0% | 27.7% | 35.8% | 78.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 21.5x | 64.7x | 39.4x | — |
| Total Debt | $70M | $1.21B | $0.00 | $405M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $613K | $12M | $14M | $1M | $27M |
GIPR vs FCPT vs NTST vs PSTL vs LAND — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Generation Income P… (GIPR) | 100 | 3.8 | -96.2% |
| Four Corners Proper… (FCPT) | 100 | 87.6 | -12.4% |
| NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) | 100 | 84.9 | -15.1% |
| Postal Realty Trust… (PSTL) | 100 | 119.4 | +19.4% |
| Gladstone Land Corp… (LAND) | 100 | 44.2 | -55.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GIPR vs FCPT vs NTST vs PSTL vs LAND
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GIPR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 98.2% yield, vs FCPT's 5.6%
FCPT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.14, yield 5.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.14, Low D/E 74.2%, current ratio 0.30x
- Better valuation composite
- 38.7% margin vs GIPR's -103.2%
NTST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 30.0%, EPS growth 150.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.2%
- 30.0% FFO/revenue growth vs LAND's -10.7%
- Beta 0.05 vs GIPR's 1.73
PSTL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.
- 66.7% 10Y total return vs FCPT's 98.7%
- Beta 0.30, yield 5.6%, current ratio 10.72x
- +82.6% vs GIPR's -83.9%
Among these 5 stocks, LAND doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.0% FFO/revenue growth vs LAND's -10.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 38.7% margin vs GIPR's -103.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs GIPR's 1.73 | |
| Dividends | 98.2% yield, vs FCPT's 5.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +82.6% vs GIPR's -83.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.1% ROA vs GIPR's -9.5%, ROIC 4.5% vs -4.0% |
GIPR vs FCPT vs NTST vs PSTL vs LAND — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
GIPR vs FCPT vs NTST vs PSTL vs LAND — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FCPT leads in 2 of 6 categories
GIPR leads 1 • PSTL leads 1 • NTST leads 0 • LAND leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FCPT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FCPT is the larger business by revenue, generating $301M annually — 30.2x GIPR's $10M. FCPT is the more profitable business, keeping 38.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GIPR's -103.2%. On growth, LAND holds the edge at +38.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $301M | $176M | $96M | $76M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | $231M | $133M | $58M | $94M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10M | $117M | $185,000 | $14M | -$10M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $654,400 | $188M | $106M | $38M | $5M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +74.1% | +98.0% | +92.4% | +88.2% | +87.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -66.7% | +56.0% | +27.7% | +35.8% | +78.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -103.2% | +38.7% | +0.1% | +14.8% | -13.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.6% | +62.5% | +59.9% | +39.2% | +6.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.9% | +9.4% | +27.7% | +21.7% | +38.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.5% | +7.7% | +110.6% | -5.9% | +66.7% |
Valuation Metrics
GIPR leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.1x trailing earnings, FCPT trades at a 91% valuation discount to NTST's 254.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NTST offers better value at 4.34x vs FCPT's 116.68x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $2.8B | $1.7B | $774M | $350M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $71M | $4.0B | $1.7B | $1.2B | $322M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.17x | 23.06x | 254.00x | 47.68x | -33.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 21.53x | 64.65x | 39.38x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 116.68x | 4.34x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 17.64x | 12.31x | 20.19x | 3.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.15x | 9.38x | 8.70x | 8.08x | 4.59x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.04x | 1.59x | 1.18x | 1.52x | 0.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.42x | 14.35x | 15.49x | 20.61x | 50.00x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FCPT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FCPT delivers a 7.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-32 for GIPR. FCPT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.74x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GIPR's 2.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FCPT scores 7/9 vs LAND's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -32.2% | +7.4% | +0.0% | +4.2% | -1.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.5% | +4.1% | +0.0% | +2.0% | -0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.0% | +4.5% | +2.1% | +3.7% | +4.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.0% | +6.0% | +2.1% | +5.0% | +4.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.14x | 0.74x | — | 1.13x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $70M | $1.2B | -$14M | $403M | -$27M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $612,939 | $12M | $14M | $1M | $27M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $70M | $1.2B | $0 | $405M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.20x | 3.17x | — | 2.19x | 2.99x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PSTL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PSTL five years ago would be worth $13,652 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,339 for GIPR. Over the past 12 months, PSTL leads with a +82.6% total return vs GIPR's -83.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PSTL at 18.6% vs GIPR's -42.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -59.7% | +9.8% | +15.6% | +40.5% | +7.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -83.9% | -4.1% | +31.6% | +82.6% | +5.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.5% | +12.3% | +26.6% | +66.6% | -28.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.6% | +15.4% | +17.0% | +36.5% | -39.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.2% | +98.7% | +40.5% | +66.7% | +46.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -42.0% | +3.9% | +8.2% | +18.6% | -10.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NTST and PSTL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NTST is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GIPR's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PSTL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs GIPR's 13.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.73x | 0.14x | 0.05x | 0.30x | 0.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.99 | $28.14 | $21.30 | $22.53 | $13.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.23 | $22.78 | $15.24 | $12.50 | $8.47 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +13.4% | +89.3% | +95.4% | +99.5% | +74.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.1 | 50.6 | 48.2 | 64.8 | 34.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 670K | 1.2M | 250K | 570K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GIPR and FCPT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FCPT as "Hold", NTST as "Buy", PSTL as "Buy", LAND as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.4% upside for NTST (target: $22) vs -0.4% for PSTL (target: $22). For income investors, GIPR offers the higher dividend yield at 98.24% vs NTST's 4.10%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $27.00 | $22.03 | $22.33 | $10.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 18 | 13 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +98.2% | +5.6% | +4.1% | +5.6% | +6.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.26 | $1.40 | $0.83 | $1.26 | $0.66 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FCPT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GIPR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
GIPR vs FCPT vs NTST vs PSTL vs LAND: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GIPR or FCPT or NTST or PSTL or LAND a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is the stronger pick with 30. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 7% for Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND). Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT) offers the better valuation at 23. 1x trailing P/E (21. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GIPR or FCPT or NTST or PSTL or LAND?
On trailing P/E, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.
(FCPT) is the cheapest at 23. 1x versus NETSTREIT Corp. at 254. 0x. On forward P/E, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. is actually cheaper at 21. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NETSTREIT Corp. wins at 1. 11x versus Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. 's 116. 68x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GIPR or FCPT or NTST or PSTL or LAND?
Over the past 5 years, Postal Realty Trust, Inc.
(PSTL) delivered a total return of +36. 5%, compared to -76. 6% for Generation Income Properties, Inc. (GIPR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FCPT returned +98. 7% versus GIPR's -56. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GIPR or FCPT or NTST or PSTL or LAND?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 05β versus Generation Income Properties, Inc. 's 1. 73β — meaning GIPR is approximately 3381% more volatile than NTST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 74% versus 2% for Generation Income Properties, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GIPR or FCPT or NTST or PSTL or LAND?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is pulling ahead at 30. 0% versus -10. 7% for Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NETSTREIT Corp. grew EPS 150. 0% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for Gladstone Land Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, GIPR leads at 35. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GIPR or FCPT or NTST or PSTL or LAND?
Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.
(FCPT) is the more profitable company, earning 38. 2% net margin versus -85. 5% for Generation Income Properties, Inc. — meaning it keeps 38. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LAND leads at 78. 6% versus -52. 6% for GIPR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTST leads at 99. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GIPR or FCPT or NTST or PSTL or LAND more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 11x versus Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. 's 116. 68x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT) trades at 21. 5x forward P/E versus 64. 7x for NETSTREIT Corp. — 43. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NTST: 8. 4% to $22. 03.
08Which pays a better dividend — GIPR or FCPT or NTST or PSTL or LAND?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Generation Income Properties, Inc. (GIPR) offers the highest yield at 98. 2%, versus 4. 1% for NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST).
09Is GIPR or FCPT or NTST or PSTL or LAND better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 05), 4. 1% yield). Generation Income Properties, Inc. (GIPR) carries a higher beta of 1. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTST: +40. 5%, GIPR: -56. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GIPR and FCPT and NTST and PSTL and LAND?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GIPR is a small-cap high-growth stock; FCPT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NTST is a small-cap high-growth stock; PSTL is a small-cap high-growth stock; LAND is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.