Marine Shipping
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GLBS vs SHIP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Marine Shipping
GLBS vs SHIP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping |
| Market Cap | $45M | $342M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $44M | $153M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $15M |
| Gross Margin | 26.5% | 45.4% |
| Operating Margin | 5.4% | 23.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.9x |
| Total Debt | $109M | $290M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $27M | $63M |
GLBS vs SHIP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Globus Maritime Lim… (GLBS) | 100 | 3.3 | -96.7% |
| Seanergy Maritime H… (SHIP) | 100 | 82.6 | -17.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GLBS vs SHIP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GLBS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.50
- Rev growth 26.8%, EPS growth -5.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -10.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 62.1%, current ratio 2.74x
SHIP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- -99.7% 10Y total return vs GLBS's -99.9%
- 9.7% margin vs GLBS's -4.0%
- 2.9% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.8% revenue growth vs SHIP's -5.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.7% margin vs GLBS's -4.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs SHIP's 1.21, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +207.0% vs GLBS's +101.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.5% ROA vs GLBS's -0.6%, ROIC 6.1% vs 0.7% |
GLBS vs SHIP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GLBS vs SHIP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GLBS and SHIP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SHIP is the larger business by revenue, generating $153M annually — 3.5x GLBS's $44M. SHIP is the more profitable business, keeping 9.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GLBS's -4.0%. On growth, GLBS holds the edge at +54.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $44M | $153M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $16M | $68M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | $15M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | -$6M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.5% | +45.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | +23.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | +9.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.2% | -4.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +54.8% | +18.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +141.9% | +84.4% |
Valuation Metrics
GLBS leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SHIP's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GLBS's 7.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $45M | $342M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $128M | $570M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -26.04x | 16.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.55x | 7.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.02x | 2.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.26x | 1.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 20.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SHIP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SHIP delivers a 5.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-1 for GLBS. GLBS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.62x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SHIP's 1.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GLBS scores 6/9 vs SHIP's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -1.0% | +5.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.6% | +2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.7% | +6.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.9% | +7.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.62x | 1.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $83M | $228M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $27M | $63M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $109M | $290M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.76x | 1.68x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SHIP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SHIP five years ago would be worth $16,564 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,955 for GLBS. Over the past 12 months, SHIP leads with a +207.0% total return vs GLBS's +101.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHIP at 56.3% vs GLBS's 31.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +32.5% | +79.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +101.8% | +207.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +126.8% | +282.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.5% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -99.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +31.4% | +56.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GLBS and SHIP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GLBS is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHIP's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHIP currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs GLBS's 90.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.50x | 1.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.44 | $16.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.99 | $5.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.2% | +96.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.2 | 62.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 87K | 258K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
SHIP is the only dividend payer here at 2.85% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.46 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SHIP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). GLBS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
GLBS vs SHIP: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GLBS or SHIP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Globus Maritime Limited (GLBS) is the stronger pick with 26.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 6% for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP). Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (6. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GLBS or SHIP?
Over the past 5 years, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
(SHIP) delivered a total return of +65. 6%, compared to -50. 5% for Globus Maritime Limited (GLBS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHIP returned -99. 7% versus GLBS's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GLBS or SHIP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Globus Maritime Limited (GLBS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
50β versus Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. 's 1. 21β — meaning SHIP is approximately 141% more volatile than GLBS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Globus Maritime Limited (GLBS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 62% versus 103% for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — GLBS or SHIP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Globus Maritime Limited (GLBS) is pulling ahead at 26.
8% versus -5. 6% for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. grew EPS -52. 1% year-over-year, compared to -504. 3% for Globus Maritime Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHIP leads at 8. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GLBS or SHIP?
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
(SHIP) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 2% net margin versus -4. 0% for Globus Maritime Limited — meaning it keeps 13. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SHIP leads at 26. 0% versus 5. 4% for GLBS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SHIP leads at 39. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — GLBS or SHIP?
In this comparison, SHIP (2.
9% yield) pays a dividend. GLBS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is GLBS or SHIP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Globus Maritime Limited (GLBS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
50)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GLBS: -99. 9%, SHIP: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between GLBS and SHIP?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GLBS is a small-cap high-growth stock; SHIP is a small-cap deep-value stock. SHIP pays a dividend while GLBS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.