GLDD vs CIVI

For growth investors, Civitas Resources, Inc.

(CIVI) is the stronger pick with 49. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 16. 5% for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD). Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc.

(CIVI) is the cheapest at 3. 2x versus Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation at 15. 7x. On forward P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Civitas Resources, Inc. wins at 0. 32x versus Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation's 9. 93x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Civitas Resources, Inc.

(CIVI) delivered a total return of +30. 2%, compared to +20. 2% for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GLDD returned +276. 9% versus CIVI's -87. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

92β versus Civitas Resources, Inc. 's 1. 10β — meaning CIVI is approximately 19% more volatile than GLDD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 68% versus 89% for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Civitas Resources, Inc.

(CIVI) is pulling ahead at 49. 8% versus 16. 5% for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation grew EPS 28. 6% year-over-year, compared to -6. 2% for Civitas Resources, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CIVI leads at 77. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Civitas Resources, Inc.

(CIVI) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 1% net margin versus 8. 3% for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation — meaning it keeps 16. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CIVI leads at 29. 0% versus 14. 1% for GLDD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CIVI leads at 41. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 32x versus Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation's 9. 93x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) trades at 6. 8x forward P/E versus 15. 4x for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation — 8. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

In this comparison, CIVI (18.

2% yield) pays a dividend. GLDD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Civitas Resources, Inc.

(CIVI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 10), 18. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CIVI: -87. 5%, GLDD: +276. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (GLDD (Industrials) and CIVI (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

CIVI pays a dividend while GLDD does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.