Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
GLIBA vs CABO vs CHTR vs LBRDA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
Telecommunications Services
Telecommunications Services
GLIBA vs CABO vs CHTR vs LBRDA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $842M | $345M | $20.29B | $5.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.05B | $1.47B | $54.64B | $261M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-309M | $-260M | $5.13B | $-2.74B |
| Gross Margin | 39.9% | 39.0% | 43.3% | 77.8% |
| Operating Margin | -33.2% | 26.0% | 24.1% | 8.8% |
| Forward P/E | 6.5x | 2.6x | 3.8x | 3.2x |
| Total Debt | $1.15B | $3.19B | $97.12B | $1.75B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $424M | $153M | $477M | $57M |
GLIBA vs CABO vs CHTR vs LBRDA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| GCI Liberty, Inc. (GLIBA) | 100 | 39.3 | -60.7% |
| Cable One, Inc. (CABO) | 100 | 3.2 | -96.8% |
| Charter Communicati… (CHTR) | 100 | 29.5 | -70.5% |
| Liberty Broadband C… (LBRDA) | 100 | 27.7 | -72.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GLIBA vs CABO vs CHTR vs LBRDA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GLIBA has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.45
- 5.3% revenue growth vs LBRDA's -100.0%
- -16.4% vs CABO's -65.2%
CABO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (2.6x vs 3.2x)
- 5.0% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
CHTR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -0.6%, EPS growth 3.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.5%
- -24.9% 10Y total return vs GLIBA's -50.4%
- 9.4% margin vs LBRDA's -10.5%
- 3.3% ROA vs LBRDA's -22.6%, ROIC 8.6% vs -0.3%
LBRDA is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.30, Low D/E 30.6%, current ratio 0.10x
- Beta 0.30, current ratio 0.10x
- Beta 0.30 vs GLIBA's 0.45, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.3% revenue growth vs LBRDA's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.6x vs 3.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.4% margin vs LBRDA's -10.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.30 vs GLIBA's 0.45, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.0% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -16.4% vs CABO's -65.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.3% ROA vs LBRDA's -22.6%, ROIC 8.6% vs -0.3% |
GLIBA vs CABO vs CHTR vs LBRDA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GLIBA vs CABO vs CHTR vs LBRDA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GLIBA leads in 2 of 6 categories
CABO leads 1 • CHTR leads 1 • LBRDA leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CABO and CHTR and LBRDA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHTR is the larger business by revenue, generating $54.6B annually — 209.3x LBRDA's $261M. CHTR is the more profitable business, keeping 9.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LBRDA's -10.5%. On growth, CHTR holds the edge at -1.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $1.5B | $54.6B | $261M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$135M | $730M | $20.9B | -$3.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$309M | -$260M | $5.1B | -$2.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $122M | -$167M | $4.0B | $303M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.9% | +39.0% | +43.3% | +77.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -33.2% | +26.0% | +24.1% | +8.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -29.5% | -17.7% | +9.4% | -10.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.7% | -11.3% | +7.4% | +116.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -7.3% | -1.0% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +12.3% | +8.9% | -24.6% |
Valuation Metrics
CABO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, GLIBA's 3.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CHTR's 5.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $842M | $345M | $20.3B | $5.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $3.4B | $116.9B | $7.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.72x | -0.96x | 4.43x | -1.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.53x | 2.63x | 3.80x | 3.20x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.24x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.57x | 4.60x | 5.31x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.80x | 0.23x | 0.37x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.49x | 0.24x | 1.08x | 0.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.90x | 1.24x | 4.59x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CHTR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHTR delivers a 25.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $-36 for LBRDA. LBRDA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.31x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CHTR's 4.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHTR scores 7/9 vs LBRDA's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -20.4% | -18.3% | +25.2% | -35.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.4% | -4.6% | +3.3% | -22.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.5% | +6.1% | +8.6% | -0.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.5% | +7.1% | +9.6% | -0.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.68x | 2.23x | 4.73x | 0.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $729M | $3.0B | $96.6B | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $424M | $153M | $477M | $57M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $3.2B | $97.1B | $1.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.96x | 3.06x | 2.48x | -28.58x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GLIBA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GLIBA five years ago would be worth $8,357 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $605 for CABO. Over the past 12 months, GLIBA leads with a -16.4% total return vs CABO's -65.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GLIBA at -5.8% vs CABO's -50.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -24.3% | -41.7% | -23.4% | -23.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -16.4% | -65.2% | -60.4% | -59.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.4% | -87.7% | -54.3% | -53.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.4% | -93.9% | -76.9% | -76.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.4% | -70.3% | -24.9% | -35.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.8% | -50.3% | -23.0% | -22.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GLIBA and LBRDA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LBRDA is the less volatile stock with a 0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GLIBA's 0.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GLIBA currently trades 64.9% from its 52-week high vs CABO's 32.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.45x | 0.42x | 0.33x | 0.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $41.87 | $186.54 | $437.06 | $102.38 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.40 | $53.94 | $156.00 | $36.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.9% | +32.6% | +36.7% | +36.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.4 | 23.1 | 28.2 | 28.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 41K | 151K | 2.3M | 180K |
Analyst Outlook
GLIBA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CABO as "Hold", CHTR as "Buy", LBRDA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 323.6% upside for LBRDA (target: $158) vs 31.6% for CABO (target: $80). CABO is the only dividend payer here at 5.03% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $68.00 | $80.00 | $277.40 | $158.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 14 | 55 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +5.0% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.06 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +25.3% | 0.0% |
GLIBA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). CABO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
GLIBA vs CABO vs CHTR vs LBRDA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GLIBA or CABO or CHTR or LBRDA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Charter Communications, Inc.
(CHTR) is the stronger pick with -0. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Liberty Broadband Corporation (LBRDA). Charter Communications, Inc. (CHTR) offers the better valuation at 4. 4x trailing P/E (3. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Charter Communications, Inc. (CHTR) a "Buy" — based on 55 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GLIBA or CABO or CHTR or LBRDA?
On forward P/E, Cable One, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 2. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GLIBA or CABO or CHTR or LBRDA?
Over the past 5 years, GCI Liberty, Inc.
(GLIBA) delivered a total return of -16. 4%, compared to -93. 9% for Cable One, Inc. (CABO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHTR returned -24. 9% versus CABO's -70. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GLIBA or CABO or CHTR or LBRDA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Liberty Broadband Corporation (LBRDA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
30β versus GCI Liberty, Inc. 's 0. 45β — meaning GLIBA is approximately 49% more volatile than LBRDA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Liberty Broadband Corporation (LBRDA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 31% versus 5% for Charter Communications, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GLIBA or CABO or CHTR or LBRDA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Charter Communications, Inc.
(CHTR) is pulling ahead at -0. 6% versus -100. 0% for Liberty Broadband Corporation (LBRDA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Charter Communications, Inc. grew EPS 3. 5% year-over-year, compared to -25. 5% for Cable One, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GLIBA leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GLIBA or CABO or CHTR or LBRDA?
Charter Communications, Inc.
(CHTR) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 1% net margin versus -1050. 2% for Liberty Broadband Corporation — meaning it keeps 9. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CABO leads at 26. 5% versus 8. 8% for LBRDA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LBRDA leads at 77. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GLIBA or CABO or CHTR or LBRDA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Cable One, Inc.
(CABO) trades at 2. 6x forward P/E versus 6. 5x for GCI Liberty, Inc. — 3. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LBRDA: 323. 6% to $158. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GLIBA or CABO or CHTR or LBRDA?
In this comparison, CABO (5.
0% yield) pays a dividend. GLIBA, CHTR, LBRDA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GLIBA or CABO or CHTR or LBRDA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cable One, Inc.
(CABO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 42), 5. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CABO: -70. 3%, GLIBA: -50. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GLIBA and CABO and CHTR and LBRDA?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GLIBA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CABO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CHTR is a mid-cap deep-value stock; LBRDA is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CABO pays a dividend while GLIBA, CHTR, LBRDA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 23%
- Dividend Yield > 2.0%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.