Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GLP vs CAPL vs MMLP vs NGL vs DKL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GLP
Global Partners LP

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.62B
5Y Perf.+368.1%
CAPL
CrossAmerica Partners LP

Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$812M
5Y Perf.+41.1%
MMLP
Martin Midstream Partners L.P.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$100M
5Y Perf.+2.8%
NGL
NGL Energy Partners LP

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.00B
5Y Perf.+216.3%
DKL
Delek Logistics Partners, LP

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.71B
5Y Perf.+114.3%

GLP vs CAPL vs MMLP vs NGL vs DKL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GLP logoGLP
CAPL logoCAPL
MMLP logoMMLP
NGL logoNGL
DKL logoDKL
IndustryOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas Refining & MarketingOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$1.62B$812M$100M$2.00B$2.71B
Revenue (TTM)$18.56B$4.62B$711M$3.03B$1.06B
Net Income (TTM)$82M$60M$-20M$159M$170M
Gross Margin5.7%8.5%22.3%46.8%19.2%
Operating Margin1.3%2.6%5.8%13.3%16.5%
Forward P/E15.0x49.5x47.4x13.8x
Total Debt$1.62B$908M$525M$3.08B$35M
Cash & Equiv.$12M$3M$49K$6M$11M

GLP vs CAPL vs MMLP vs NGL vs DKLLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GLP
CAPL
MMLP
NGL
DKL
StockMay 20May 26Return
Global Partners LP (GLP)100468.1+368.1%
CrossAmerica Partne… (CAPL)100141.1+41.1%
Martin Midstream Pa… (MMLP)100102.8+2.8%
NGL Energy Partners… (NGL)100316.3+216.3%
Delek Logistics Par… (DKL)100214.3+114.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GLP vs CAPL vs MMLP vs NGL vs DKL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: DKL leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. NGL Energy Partners LP is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and recent price momentum and sentiment. GLP and CAPL also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
GLP
Global Partners LP
The Growth Play

GLP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 8.1%, EPS growth -12.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.6%
  • 455.9% 10Y total return vs DKL's 207.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.25, current ratio 1.14x
  • 8.1% revenue growth vs NGL's -16.5%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
CAPL
CrossAmerica Partners LP
The Income Pick

CAPL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 9.9%
  • Beta 0.06 vs NGL's 0.67
Best for: income & stability
MMLP
Martin Midstream Partners L.P.
The Lower-Volatility Pick

Among these 5 stocks, MMLP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: energy exposure
NGL
NGL Energy Partners LP
The Defensive Pick

NGL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.

  • Beta 0.67, yield 14.3%, current ratio 1.30x
  • 14.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs DKL's 8.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
  • +417.0% vs MMLP's -14.5%
Best for: defensive
DKL
Delek Logistics Partners, LP
The Value Play

DKL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.

  • Lower P/E (13.8x vs 47.4x)
  • 16.0% margin vs MMLP's -2.8%
  • 6.1% ROA vs MMLP's -3.9%, ROIC 14.1% vs 8.0%
Best for: value and quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGLP logoGLP8.1% revenue growth vs NGL's -16.5%
ValueDKL logoDKLLower P/E (13.8x vs 47.4x)
Quality / MarginsDKL logoDKL16.0% margin vs MMLP's -2.8%
Stability / SafetyCAPL logoCAPLBeta 0.06 vs NGL's 0.67
DividendsNGL logoNGL14.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs DKL's 8.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)NGL logoNGL+417.0% vs MMLP's -14.5%
Efficiency (ROA)DKL logoDKL6.1% ROA vs MMLP's -3.9%, ROIC 14.1% vs 8.0%

GLP vs CAPL vs MMLP vs NGL vs DKL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GLPGlobal Partners LP
FY 2024
Wholesale
62.4%$10.7B
GDSO
31.3%$5.4B
Commercial
6.2%$1.1B
CAPLCrossAmerica Partners LP
FY 2025
Fuel Sales To External Customers
88.0%$3.2B
Food And Merchandise Sales
11.3%$407M
Product and Service, Other
0.7%$24M
MMLPMartin Midstream Partners L.P.
FY 2025
Product
36.2%$396M
Specialty Products
22.7%$249M
Transportation
19.4%$213M
Sulfur Service, Product Sales
13.5%$148M
Terminalling And Storage
8.3%$91M
NGLNGL Energy Partners LP
FY 2025
Liquids Logistics Segment
52.9%$1.8B
Crude Oil Logistics Segment
25.4%$880M
Water Solutions Segment
21.8%$756M
DKLDelek Logistics Partners, LP
FY 2023
Wholesale Marketing and Terminalling
49.6%$506M
Gathering And Processing
36.4%$371M
Storage And Transportation
14.1%$144M

GLP vs CAPL vs MMLP vs NGL vs DKL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLDKLLAGGINGMMLP

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

DKL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

GLP is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.6B annually — 26.1x MMLP's $711M. DKL is the more profitable business, keeping 16.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MMLP's -2.8%. On growth, DKL holds the edge at +19.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricGLP logoGLPGlobal Partners LPCAPL logoCAPLCrossAmerica Part…MMLP logoMMLPMartin Midstream …NGL logoNGLNGL Energy Partne…DKL logoDKLDelek Logistics P…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$18.6B$4.6B$711M$3.0B$1.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$340M$200M$91M$672M$310M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$82M$60M-$20M$159M$170M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$238M$75M$15M$291M$112M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+5.7%+8.5%+22.3%+46.8%+19.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+1.3%+2.6%+5.8%+13.3%+16.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+0.4%+1.3%-2.8%+5.3%+16.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+1.3%+1.6%+2.2%+9.6%+10.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.0%-100.0%-2.5%-41.3%+19.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+3.8%+2.4%-5.6%+4.2%-17.8%
DKL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

GLP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 15.5x trailing earnings, DKL trades at a 32% valuation discount to GLP's 22.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CAPL's 5.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GLP's 13.7x.

MetricGLP logoGLPGlobal Partners LPCAPL logoCAPLCrossAmerica Part…MMLP logoMMLPMartin Midstream …NGL logoNGLNGL Energy Partne…DKL logoDKLDelek Logistics P…
Market CapShares × price$1.6B$812M$100M$2.0B$2.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.2B$1.7B$625M$5.1B$2.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS22.63x19.54x-6.95x-26.88x15.46x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.97x49.53x47.44x13.82x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.73x5.80x6.44x8.51x8.81x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.09x0.22x0.14x0.58x2.68x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.42x3.05x446.88x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF5.67x14.57x7.17x38.67x
GLP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

DKL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

DKL delivers a 19.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $12 for GLP. GLP carries lower financial leverage with a 2.40x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DKL's 5.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NGL scores 7/9 vs MMLP's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricGLP logoGLPGlobal Partners LPCAPL logoCAPLCrossAmerica Part…MMLP logoMMLPMartin Midstream …NGL logoNGLNGL Energy Partne…DKL logoDKLDelek Logistics P…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+12.1%+132.6%+19.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.1%+6.0%-3.9%+3.6%+6.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.0%+18.1%+8.0%+6.4%+14.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+8.4%+23.4%+11.4%+8.3%+8.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965374
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.40x4.42x5.75x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.6B$905M$525M$3.1B$24M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$12M$3M$49,000$6M$11M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.6B$908M$525M$3.1B$35M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.51x1.86x0.72x2.15x1.66x
DKL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NGL five years ago would be worth $72,658 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,438 for MMLP. Over the past 12 months, NGL leads with a +417.0% total return vs MMLP's -14.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NGL at 80.6% vs MMLP's 1.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGLP logoGLPGlobal Partners LPCAPL logoCAPLCrossAmerica Part…MMLP logoMMLPMartin Midstream …NGL logoNGLNGL Energy Partne…DKL logoDKLDelek Logistics P…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+14.8%+8.4%-4.6%+62.9%+13.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+1.2%+2.7%-14.5%+417.0%+45.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+86.4%+34.7%+5.0%+488.7%+45.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+149.9%+56.1%+14.4%+626.6%+86.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+455.9%+87.5%-57.7%+78.8%+207.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+23.1%+10.4%+1.6%+80.6%+13.3%
NGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CAPL and NGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CAPL is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NGL's 0.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NGL currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs MMLP's 72.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGLP logoGLPGlobal Partners LPCAPL logoCAPLCrossAmerica Part…MMLP logoMMLPMartin Midstream …NGL logoNGLNGL Energy Partne…DKL logoDKLDelek Logistics P…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.25x0.06x0.39x0.67x0.35x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$56.51$23.62$3.54$16.69$55.89
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$39.58$19.61$2.21$2.98$37.50
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+84.5%+90.2%+72.6%+96.6%+91.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10055.941.338.565.050.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded41K50K19K238K64K
Evenly matched — CAPL and NGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — NGL and DKL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: GLP as "Sell", CAPL as "Hold", MMLP as "Buy", NGL as "Hold", DKL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 9.8% upside for DKL (target: $56) vs -87.6% for NGL (target: $2). For income investors, NGL offers the higher dividend yield at 14.34% vs MMLP's 0.80%.

MetricGLP logoGLPGlobal Partners LPCAPL logoCAPLCrossAmerica Part…MMLP logoMMLPMartin Midstream …NGL logoNGLNGL Energy Partne…DKL logoDKLDelek Logistics P…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellSellHoldBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$46.00$2.00$56.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts915111710
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+9.9%+0.8%+14.3%+8.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises02225
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.10$0.02$2.31$4.45
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.1%+0.4%
Evenly matched — NGL and DKL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

DKL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GLP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallDelek Logistics Partners, LP (DKL)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GLP vs CAPL vs MMLP vs NGL vs DKL: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GLP or CAPL or MMLP or NGL or DKL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Global Partners LP (GLP) is the stronger pick with 8.

1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 5% for NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL). Delek Logistics Partners, LP (DKL) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (13. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Martin Midstream Partners L. P. (MMLP) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — GLP or CAPL or MMLP or NGL or DKL?

On trailing P/E, Delek Logistics Partners, LP (DKL) is the cheapest at 15.

5x versus Global Partners LP at 22. 6x. On forward P/E, Delek Logistics Partners, LP is actually cheaper at 13. 8x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — GLP or CAPL or MMLP or NGL or DKL?

Over the past 5 years, NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL) delivered a total return of +626.

6%, compared to +14. 4% for Martin Midstream Partners L. P. (MMLP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GLP returned +455. 9% versus MMLP's -57. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — GLP or CAPL or MMLP or NGL or DKL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

06β versus NGL Energy Partners LP's 0. 67β — meaning NGL is approximately 1105% more volatile than CAPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Global Partners LP (GLP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 6% for Delek Logistics Partners, LP — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — GLP or CAPL or MMLP or NGL or DKL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Global Partners LP (GLP) is pulling ahead at 8.

1% versus -16. 5% for NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CrossAmerica Partners LP grew EPS 109. 6% year-over-year, compared to -184. 6% for Martin Midstream Partners L. P.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GLP leads at -0. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — GLP or CAPL or MMLP or NGL or DKL?

Delek Logistics Partners, LP (DKL) is the more profitable company, earning 17.

4% net margin versus -2. 0% for Martin Midstream Partners L. P. — meaning it keeps 17. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DKL leads at 18. 0% versus 1. 3% for GLP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DKL leads at 20. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is GLP or CAPL or MMLP or NGL or DKL more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Delek Logistics Partners, LP (DKL) trades at 13.

8x forward P/E versus 49. 5x for CrossAmerica Partners LP — 35. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DKL: 9. 8% to $56. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — GLP or CAPL or MMLP or NGL or DKL?

In this comparison, NGL (14.

3% yield), CAPL (9. 9% yield), DKL (8. 7% yield), MMLP (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. GLP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is GLP or CAPL or MMLP or NGL or DKL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

06), 9. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CAPL: +87. 5%, NGL: +78. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between GLP and CAPL and MMLP and NGL and DKL?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: GLP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CAPL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MMLP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NGL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; DKL is a small-cap deep-value stock. CAPL, MMLP, NGL, DKL pay a dividend while GLP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

GLP

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CAPL

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 3.9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MMLP

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 13%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NGL

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 5.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DKL

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform GLP and CAPL and MMLP and NGL and DKL on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(GLP: 11.0% · CAPL: -100.0%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(GLP: 22.6x · CAPL: 19.5x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.