Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GLP vs CAPL vs MMLP vs NGL vs DKL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
GLP vs CAPL vs MMLP vs NGL vs DKL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $1.62B | $812M | $100M | $2.00B | $2.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $18.56B | $4.62B | $711M | $3.03B | $1.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $82M | $60M | $-20M | $159M | $170M |
| Gross Margin | 5.7% | 8.5% | 22.3% | 46.8% | 19.2% |
| Operating Margin | 1.3% | 2.6% | 5.8% | 13.3% | 16.5% |
| Forward P/E | 15.0x | 49.5x | — | 47.4x | 13.8x |
| Total Debt | $1.62B | $908M | $525M | $3.08B | $35M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12M | $3M | $49K | $6M | $11M |
GLP vs CAPL vs MMLP vs NGL vs DKL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Partners LP (GLP) | 100 | 468.1 | +368.1% |
| CrossAmerica Partne… (CAPL) | 100 | 141.1 | +41.1% |
| Martin Midstream Pa… (MMLP) | 100 | 102.8 | +2.8% |
| NGL Energy Partners… (NGL) | 100 | 316.3 | +216.3% |
| Delek Logistics Par… (DKL) | 100 | 214.3 | +114.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GLP vs CAPL vs MMLP vs NGL vs DKL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GLP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 8.1%, EPS growth -12.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.6%
- 455.9% 10Y total return vs DKL's 207.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.25, current ratio 1.14x
- 8.1% revenue growth vs NGL's -16.5%
CAPL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 9.9%
- Beta 0.06 vs NGL's 0.67
Among these 5 stocks, MMLP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NGL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 0.67, yield 14.3%, current ratio 1.30x
- 14.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs DKL's 8.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- +417.0% vs MMLP's -14.5%
DKL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (13.8x vs 47.4x)
- 16.0% margin vs MMLP's -2.8%
- 6.1% ROA vs MMLP's -3.9%, ROIC 14.1% vs 8.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.1% revenue growth vs NGL's -16.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.8x vs 47.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.0% margin vs MMLP's -2.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs NGL's 0.67 | |
| Dividends | 14.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs DKL's 8.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +417.0% vs MMLP's -14.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.1% ROA vs MMLP's -3.9%, ROIC 14.1% vs 8.0% |
GLP vs CAPL vs MMLP vs NGL vs DKL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GLP vs CAPL vs MMLP vs NGL vs DKL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DKL leads in 2 of 6 categories
GLP leads 1 • NGL leads 1 • CAPL leads 0 • MMLP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DKL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GLP is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.6B annually — 26.1x MMLP's $711M. DKL is the more profitable business, keeping 16.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MMLP's -2.8%. On growth, DKL holds the edge at +19.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $18.6B | $4.6B | $711M | $3.0B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $340M | $200M | $91M | $672M | $310M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $82M | $60M | -$20M | $159M | $170M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $238M | $75M | $15M | $291M | $112M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +8.5% | +22.3% | +46.8% | +19.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +2.6% | +5.8% | +13.3% | +16.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.4% | +1.3% | -2.8% | +5.3% | +16.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +1.6% | +2.2% | +9.6% | +10.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.0% | -100.0% | -2.5% | -41.3% | +19.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.8% | +2.4% | -5.6% | +4.2% | -17.8% |
Valuation Metrics
GLP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.5x trailing earnings, DKL trades at a 32% valuation discount to GLP's 22.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CAPL's 5.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GLP's 13.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $812M | $100M | $2.0B | $2.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.2B | $1.7B | $625M | $5.1B | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.63x | 19.54x | -6.95x | -26.88x | 15.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.97x | 49.53x | — | 47.44x | 13.82x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.73x | 5.80x | 6.44x | 8.51x | 8.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.09x | 0.22x | 0.14x | 0.58x | 2.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.42x | — | — | 3.05x | 446.88x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.67x | 14.57x | 7.17x | 38.67x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
DKL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DKL delivers a 19.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $12 for GLP. GLP carries lower financial leverage with a 2.40x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DKL's 5.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NGL scores 7/9 vs MMLP's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.1% | — | — | +132.6% | +19.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.1% | +6.0% | -3.9% | +3.6% | +6.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.0% | +18.1% | +8.0% | +6.4% | +14.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.4% | +23.4% | +11.4% | +8.3% | +8.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.40x | — | — | 4.42x | 5.75x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.6B | $905M | $525M | $3.1B | $24M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12M | $3M | $49,000 | $6M | $11M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.6B | $908M | $525M | $3.1B | $35M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.51x | 1.86x | 0.72x | 2.15x | 1.66x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NGL five years ago would be worth $72,658 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,438 for MMLP. Over the past 12 months, NGL leads with a +417.0% total return vs MMLP's -14.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NGL at 80.6% vs MMLP's 1.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.8% | +8.4% | -4.6% | +62.9% | +13.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.2% | +2.7% | -14.5% | +417.0% | +45.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +86.4% | +34.7% | +5.0% | +488.7% | +45.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +149.9% | +56.1% | +14.4% | +626.6% | +86.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +455.9% | +87.5% | -57.7% | +78.8% | +207.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.1% | +10.4% | +1.6% | +80.6% | +13.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CAPL and NGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CAPL is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NGL's 0.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NGL currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs MMLP's 72.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.25x | 0.06x | 0.39x | 0.67x | 0.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $56.51 | $23.62 | $3.54 | $16.69 | $55.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $39.58 | $19.61 | $2.21 | $2.98 | $37.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.5% | +90.2% | +72.6% | +96.6% | +91.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.9 | 41.3 | 38.5 | 65.0 | 50.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 41K | 50K | 19K | 238K | 64K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NGL and DKL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GLP as "Sell", CAPL as "Hold", MMLP as "Buy", NGL as "Hold", DKL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 9.8% upside for DKL (target: $56) vs -87.6% for NGL (target: $2). For income investors, NGL offers the higher dividend yield at 14.34% vs MMLP's 0.80%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $46.00 | — | — | $2.00 | $56.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 15 | 11 | 17 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +9.9% | +0.8% | +14.3% | +8.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.10 | $0.02 | $2.31 | $4.45 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +0.4% |
DKL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GLP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
GLP vs CAPL vs MMLP vs NGL vs DKL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GLP or CAPL or MMLP or NGL or DKL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Global Partners LP (GLP) is the stronger pick with 8.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 5% for NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL). Delek Logistics Partners, LP (DKL) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (13. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Martin Midstream Partners L. P. (MMLP) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GLP or CAPL or MMLP or NGL or DKL?
On trailing P/E, Delek Logistics Partners, LP (DKL) is the cheapest at 15.
5x versus Global Partners LP at 22. 6x. On forward P/E, Delek Logistics Partners, LP is actually cheaper at 13. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GLP or CAPL or MMLP or NGL or DKL?
Over the past 5 years, NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL) delivered a total return of +626.
6%, compared to +14. 4% for Martin Midstream Partners L. P. (MMLP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GLP returned +455. 9% versus MMLP's -57. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GLP or CAPL or MMLP or NGL or DKL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
06β versus NGL Energy Partners LP's 0. 67β — meaning NGL is approximately 1105% more volatile than CAPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Global Partners LP (GLP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 6% for Delek Logistics Partners, LP — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GLP or CAPL or MMLP or NGL or DKL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Global Partners LP (GLP) is pulling ahead at 8.
1% versus -16. 5% for NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CrossAmerica Partners LP grew EPS 109. 6% year-over-year, compared to -184. 6% for Martin Midstream Partners L. P.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GLP leads at -0. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GLP or CAPL or MMLP or NGL or DKL?
Delek Logistics Partners, LP (DKL) is the more profitable company, earning 17.
4% net margin versus -2. 0% for Martin Midstream Partners L. P. — meaning it keeps 17. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DKL leads at 18. 0% versus 1. 3% for GLP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DKL leads at 20. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GLP or CAPL or MMLP or NGL or DKL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Delek Logistics Partners, LP (DKL) trades at 13.
8x forward P/E versus 49. 5x for CrossAmerica Partners LP — 35. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DKL: 9. 8% to $56. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GLP or CAPL or MMLP or NGL or DKL?
In this comparison, NGL (14.
3% yield), CAPL (9. 9% yield), DKL (8. 7% yield), MMLP (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. GLP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GLP or CAPL or MMLP or NGL or DKL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
06), 9. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CAPL: +87. 5%, NGL: +78. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GLP and CAPL and MMLP and NGL and DKL?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GLP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CAPL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MMLP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NGL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; DKL is a small-cap deep-value stock. CAPL, MMLP, NGL, DKL pay a dividend while GLP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.