Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GME vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
GME vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $11.27B | $2.96T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.63B | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $418M | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 33.0% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | 6.4% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 25.4x | 35.3x |
| Total Debt | $4.36B | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6.30B | $86.81B |
GME vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| GameStop Corp. (GME) | 100 | 2492.1 | +2392.1% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 225.1 | +125.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GME vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GME is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.94
- Lower volatility, beta 0.94, Low D/E 80.1%, current ratio 15.30x
- Beta 0.94, current ratio 15.30x
AMZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth 29.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.7%
- 7.2% 10Y total return vs GME's 249.8%
- 12.4% revenue growth vs GME's -5.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.4% revenue growth vs GME's -5.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (25.4x vs 35.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs GME's 11.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs AMZN's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +48.6% vs GME's -3.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs GME's 4.3%, ROIC 14.7% vs 8.5% |
GME vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GME vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 204.6x GME's $3.6B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 12.2% (AMZN) to 11.5% (GME). On growth, AMZN holds the edge at +16.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.6B | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $212M | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $418M | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $490M | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.0% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.5% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.9% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -17.2% | +74.8% |
Valuation Metrics
GME leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 32.7x trailing earnings, GME trades at a 15% valuation discount to AMZN's 38.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMZN's 20.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GME's 40.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11.3B | $2.96T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.3B | $3.02T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 32.69x | 38.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.42x | 35.26x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.37x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 40.20x | 20.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.11x | 4.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.54x | 7.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 384.26x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $8 for GME. AMZN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GME's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMZN scores 6/9 vs GME's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.0% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.3% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.5% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.1% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.80x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.9B | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6.3B | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.4B | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 39.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,632 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,253 for GME. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +48.6% total return vs GME's -3.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 37.5% vs GME's 7.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.1% | +21.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -3.3% | +48.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.7% | +159.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.5% | +66.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +249.8% | +715.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.1% | +37.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GME and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GME is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs GME's 70.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.94x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $35.81 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.93 | $183.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.3% | +98.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.1 | 80.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.8M | 45.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GME as "Hold" and AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 11.6% upside for AMZN (target: $307) vs -27.5% for GME (target: $18).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.25 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 36 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
AMZN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GME leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
GME vs AMZN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GME or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger pick with 12. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 1% for GameStop Corp. (GME). GameStop Corp. (GME) offers the better valuation at 32. 7x trailing P/E (25. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) a "Buy" — based on 94 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GME or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, GameStop Corp.
(GME) is the cheapest at 32. 7x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 38. 3x. On forward P/E, GameStop Corp. is actually cheaper at 25. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GME or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +66. 3%, compared to -37. 5% for GameStop Corp. (GME). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +715. 9% versus GME's +249. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GME or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), GameStop Corp.
(GME) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 61% more volatile than GME relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 80% for GameStop Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GME or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is pulling ahead at 12. 4% versus -5. 1% for GameStop Corp. (GME). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GameStop Corp. grew EPS 133. 3% year-over-year, compared to 29. 7% for Amazon. com, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMZN leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GME or AMZN?
GameStop Corp.
(GME) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 5% net margin versus 10. 8% for Amazon. com, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMZN leads at 11. 2% versus 6. 4% for GME. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMZN leads at 50. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GME or AMZN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, GameStop Corp.
(GME) trades at 25. 4x forward P/E versus 35. 3x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 9. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMZN: 11. 6% to $306. 77.
08Which pays a better dividend — GME or AMZN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is GME or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, GameStop Corp.
(GME) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), +249. 8% 10Y return). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GME: +249. 8%, AMZN: +715. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GME and AMZN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.