Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GME vs BBY vs SPWH vs BNED vs EVLV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Security & Protection Services
GME vs BBY vs SPWH vs BNED vs EVLV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Security & Protection Services |
| Market Cap | $10.73B | $12.29B | $55M | $364M | $1.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.63B | $41.69B | $1.21B | $1.68B | $146M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $418M | $1.07B | $-37M | $-9M | $-33M |
| Gross Margin | 33.0% | 22.5% | 31.2% | 20.2% | 51.6% |
| Operating Margin | 6.4% | 3.3% | -1.3% | 4.1% | -33.2% |
| Forward P/E | 24.2x | 9.0x | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $4.36B | $4.13B | $455M | $283M | $42M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6.30B | $1.74B | $3M | $9M | $49M |
GME vs BBY vs SPWH vs BNED vs EVLV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| GameStop Corp. (GME) | 100 | 939.2 | +839.2% |
| Best Buy Co., Inc. (BBY) | 100 | 52.6 | -47.4% |
| Sportsman's Warehou… (SPWH) | 100 | 9.9 | -90.1% |
| Barnes & Noble Educ… (BNED) | 100 | 4.1 | -95.9% |
| Evolv Technologies … (EVLV) | 100 | 73.2 | -26.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GME vs BBY vs SPWH vs BNED vs EVLV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GME is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 232.2% 10Y total return vs BBY's 161.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.94, Low D/E 80.1%, current ratio 15.30x
- Beta 0.94, current ratio 15.30x
- 11.5% margin vs EVLV's -22.7%
BBY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 1.08, yield 6.5%
- Better valuation composite
- 6.5% yield; 8-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- 7.0% ROA vs EVLV's -11.6%, ROIC 18.7% vs -30.7%
SPWH lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, BNED doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
EVLV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 40.5%, EPS growth 41.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 40.4%
- 40.5% revenue growth vs SPWH's -7.0%
- +76.2% vs SPWH's -17.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 40.5% revenue growth vs SPWH's -7.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.5% margin vs EVLV's -22.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs BNED's 1.83, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.5% yield; 8-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +76.2% vs SPWH's -17.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.0% ROA vs EVLV's -11.6%, ROIC 18.7% vs -30.7% |
GME vs BBY vs SPWH vs BNED vs EVLV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GME vs BBY vs SPWH vs BNED vs EVLV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BBY leads in 2 of 6 categories
GME leads 1 • SPWH leads 1 • EVLV leads 1 • BNED leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GME leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BBY is the larger business by revenue, generating $41.7B annually — 285.7x EVLV's $146M. GME is the more profitable business, keeping 11.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EVLV's -22.7%. On growth, EVLV holds the edge at +32.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.6B | $41.7B | $1.2B | $1.7B | $146M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $212M | $1.9B | $24M | $102M | -$24M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $418M | $1.1B | -$37M | -$9M | -$33M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $490M | $1.3B | -$55M | -$5M | -$20M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.0% | +22.5% | +31.2% | +20.2% | +51.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | +3.3% | -1.3% | +4.1% | -33.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +2.6% | -3.1% | -0.6% | -22.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.5% | +3.0% | -4.5% | -0.3% | -14.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.9% | -1.0% | +1.8% | +7.0% | +32.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -17.2% | +3.7% | -12.5% | -61.5% | +158.1% |
Valuation Metrics
SPWH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.6x trailing earnings, BBY trades at a 63% valuation discount to GME's 31.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BBY's 6.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GME's 37.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10.7B | $12.3B | $55M | $364M | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.8B | $14.7B | $507M | $638M | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 31.10x | 11.62x | -1.63x | -4.27x | -35.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.19x | 9.03x | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 37.85x | 6.62x | 22.78x | 11.84x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.96x | 0.29x | 0.05x | 0.23x | 8.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.42x | 3.56x | 0.23x | 1.03x | 10.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.77x | 2.78x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BBY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BBY delivers a 36.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $-30 for EVLV. EVLV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SPWH's 1.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BBY scores 7/9 vs EVLV's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.0% | +36.8% | -17.9% | -3.4% | -30.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.3% | +7.0% | -3.9% | -1.0% | -11.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.5% | +18.7% | -1.9% | +2.3% | -30.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.1% | +20.2% | -3.2% | +3.4% | -25.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.80x | 1.18x | 1.93x | 1.04x | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.9B | $2.4B | $452M | $274M | -$7M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6.3B | $1.7B | $3M | $9M | $49M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.4B | $4.1B | $455M | $283M | $42M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 19.90x | -1.26x | 0.65x | -29.58x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EVLV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EVLV five years ago would be worth $7,207 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $136 for BNED. Over the past 12 months, EVLV leads with a +76.2% total return vs SPWH's -17.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EVLV at 21.4% vs BNED's -59.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.1% | -14.0% | -2.7% | +24.1% | +6.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -7.9% | -8.8% | -17.4% | +3.6% | +76.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.8% | -3.6% | -77.2% | -93.3% | +78.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.5% | -37.6% | -92.0% | -98.6% | -27.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +232.2% | +161.1% | -87.6% | -98.9% | -26.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.3% | -1.2% | -38.9% | -59.4% | +21.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GME and BNED each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GME is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BNED's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BNED currently trades 87.5% from its 52-week high vs SPWH's 32.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.94x | 1.08x | 1.80x | 1.83x | 1.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $35.81 | $84.99 | $4.33 | $12.21 | $8.91 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.93 | $56.68 | $1.08 | $5.90 | $4.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +66.9% | +68.9% | +32.8% | +87.5% | +80.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.1 | 40.2 | 49.9 | 57.1 | 66.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.9M | 4.2M | 833K | 231K | 2.9M |
Analyst Outlook
BBY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GME as "Hold", BBY as "Hold", BNED as "Hold", EVLV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 40.2% upside for EVLV (target: $10) vs -77.7% for BNED (target: $2). BBY is the only dividend payer here at 6.45% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.25 | $74.50 | — | $2.38 | $10.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 36 | 41 | — | 3 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +6.5% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 8 | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.78 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.2% | +0.6% | +0.0% | 0.0% |
BBY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). GME leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
GME vs BBY vs SPWH vs BNED vs EVLV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GME or BBY or SPWH or BNED or EVLV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc.
(EVLV) is the stronger pick with 40. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 0% for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. (SPWH). Best Buy Co. , Inc. (BBY) offers the better valuation at 11. 6x trailing P/E (9. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. (EVLV) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GME or BBY or SPWH or BNED or EVLV?
On trailing P/E, Best Buy Co.
, Inc. (BBY) is the cheapest at 11. 6x versus GameStop Corp. at 31. 1x. On forward P/E, Best Buy Co. , Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GME or BBY or SPWH or BNED or EVLV?
Over the past 5 years, Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc.
(EVLV) delivered a total return of -27. 9%, compared to -98. 6% for Barnes & Noble Education, Inc. (BNED). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GME returned +232. 2% versus BNED's -98. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GME or BBY or SPWH or BNED or EVLV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), GameStop Corp.
(GME) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Barnes & Noble Education, Inc. 's 1. 83β — meaning BNED is approximately 95% more volatile than GME relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. (EVLV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 193% for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GME or BBY or SPWH or BNED or EVLV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc.
(EVLV) is pulling ahead at 40. 5% versus -7. 0% for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. (SPWH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GameStop Corp. grew EPS 133. 3% year-over-year, compared to -13. 0% for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EVLV leads at 40. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GME or BBY or SPWH or BNED or EVLV?
GameStop Corp.
(GME) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 5% net margin versus -22. 7% for Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GME leads at 6. 4% versus -30. 7% for EVLV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EVLV leads at 51. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GME or BBY or SPWH or BNED or EVLV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Best Buy Co.
, Inc. (BBY) trades at 9. 0x forward P/E versus 24. 2x for GameStop Corp. — 15. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EVLV: 40. 2% to $10. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GME or BBY or SPWH or BNED or EVLV?
In this comparison, BBY (6.
5% yield) pays a dividend. GME, SPWH, BNED, EVLV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GME or BBY or SPWH or BNED or EVLV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Best Buy Co.
, Inc. (BBY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 08), 6. 5% yield, +161. 1% 10Y return). Barnes & Noble Education, Inc. (BNED) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BBY: +161. 1%, BNED: -98. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GME and BBY and SPWH and BNED and EVLV?
These companies operate in different sectors (GME (Consumer Cyclical) and BBY (Consumer Cyclical) and SPWH (Consumer Cyclical) and BNED (Consumer Cyclical) and EVLV (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GME is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BBY is a mid-cap deep-value stock; SPWH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BNED is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EVLV is a small-cap high-growth stock. BBY pays a dividend while GME, SPWH, BNED, EVLV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.