Marine Shipping
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
GNK vs CMRE vs SBLK vs DAC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Marine Shipping
Marine Shipping
Marine Shipping
GNK vs CMRE vs SBLK vs DAC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping |
| Market Cap | $1.10B | $2.10B | $3.09B | $2.42B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $114.70B | $1.09B | $1.04B | $1.04B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9.32B | $365M | $84M | $495M |
| Gross Margin | 62.9% | 48.2% | 33.0% | 60.1% |
| Operating Margin | 0.0% | 39.4% | 13.6% | 47.8% |
| Forward P/E | 14.9x | 6.8x | 8.0x | 5.3x |
| Total Debt | $200M | $1.51B | $1.07B | $1.16B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $56M | $528M | $500M | $1.04B |
GNK vs CMRE vs SBLK vs DAC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Genco Shipping & Tr… (GNK) | 100 | 534.1 | +434.1% |
| Costamare Inc. (CMRE) | 100 | 510.0 | +410.0% |
| Star Bulk Carriers … (SBLK) | 100 | 526.7 | +426.7% |
| Danaos Corporation (DAC) | 100 | 3280.4 | +3180.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GNK vs CMRE vs SBLK vs DAC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GNK plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
CMRE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 242.7% 10Y total return vs SBLK's 9.8%
- 3.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs DAC's 2.6%
- +153.2% vs DAC's +68.0%
SBLK lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
DAC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.62, yield 2.6%
- Rev growth 2.8%, EPS growth 2.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.62, Low D/E 30.4%, current ratio 3.28x
- PEG 0.11 vs SBLK's 0.16
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.8% revenue growth vs CMRE's -57.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.3x vs 8.0x), PEG 0.11 vs 0.16 | |
| Quality / Margins | 47.4% margin vs SBLK's 8.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.62 vs CMRE's 1.25, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs DAC's 2.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +153.2% vs DAC's +68.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.7% ROA vs SBLK's 2.2%, ROIC 9.8% vs 3.2% |
GNK vs CMRE vs SBLK vs DAC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
GNK vs CMRE vs SBLK vs DAC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DAC leads in 3 of 6 categories
CMRE leads 1 • GNK leads 0 • SBLK leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GNK and DAC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GNK is the larger business by revenue, generating $114.7B annually — 110.0x DAC's $1.0B. DAC is the more profitable business, keeping 47.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SBLK's 8.1%. On growth, GNK holds the edge at +1604.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $114.7B | $1.1B | $1.0B | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $112M | $550M | $311M | $695M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9.3B | $365M | $84M | $495M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $15.2B | $262M | $209M | $341M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.9% | +48.2% | +33.0% | +60.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.0% | +39.4% | +13.6% | +47.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.1% | +33.3% | +8.1% | +47.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.3% | +23.9% | +20.0% | +32.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1604.6% | -61.3% | -2.7% | +3.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +175.0% | +140.0% | +58.3% | +37.8% |
Valuation Metrics
DAC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.9x trailing earnings, DAC trades at a 87% valuation discount to SBLK's 36.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), DAC offers better value at 0.11x vs SBLK's 0.75x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $2.1B | $3.1B | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $3.1B | $3.7B | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -252.10x | 6.08x | 36.73x | 4.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.93x | 6.81x | 8.00x | 5.26x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.75x | 0.11x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.38x | 5.11x | 11.87x | 3.59x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.21x | 2.39x | 2.97x | 2.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.22x | 0.97x | 1.26x | 0.64x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 4.44x | 14.73x | 7.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DAC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CMRE delivers a 16.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $3 for SBLK. GNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMRE's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CMRE scores 7/9 vs GNK's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.2% | +16.3% | +3.4% | +13.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.0% | +8.8% | +2.2% | +9.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.7% | +9.3% | +3.2% | +9.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.9% | +11.5% | +4.0% | +11.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.70x | 0.44x | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $145M | $987M | $572M | $118M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $56M | $528M | $500M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $200M | $1.5B | $1.1B | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.00x | 5.21x | 2.08x | 11.62x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CMRE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CMRE five years ago would be worth $24,622 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,911 for SBLK. Over the past 12 months, CMRE leads with a +153.2% total return vs DAC's +68.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CMRE at 43.9% vs SBLK's 17.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +39.4% | +12.4% | +40.3% | +39.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +94.4% | +153.2% | +83.1% | +68.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +103.0% | +197.9% | +60.6% | +149.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.4% | +146.2% | +79.1% | +124.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +401.1% | +242.7% | +977.3% | +225.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.6% | +43.9% | +17.1% | +35.7% |
Risk & Volatility
DAC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DAC is the less volatile stock with a 0.62 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMRE's 1.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DAC currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs CMRE's 96.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | 1.25x | 0.73x | 0.62x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.09 | $18.05 | $27.20 | $132.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.66 | $6.63 | $14.79 | $80.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.6% | +96.3% | +98.6% | +99.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.0 | 55.5 | 72.8 | 74.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 415K | 388K | 1.4M | 83K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CMRE and DAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GNK as "Buy", CMRE as "Hold", SBLK as "Buy", DAC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 8.2% upside for SBLK (target: $29) vs -31.0% for CMRE (target: $12). For income investors, CMRE offers the higher dividend yield at 3.79% vs SBLK's 1.11%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.50 | $12.00 | $29.00 | $105.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 11 | 24 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.0% | +3.8% | +1.1% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.76 | $0.66 | $0.30 | $3.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.2% | +3.1% |
DAC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CMRE leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
GNK vs CMRE vs SBLK vs DAC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GNK or CMRE or SBLK or DAC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Danaos Corporation (DAC) is the stronger pick with 2.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -57. 9% for Costamare Inc. (CMRE). Danaos Corporation (DAC) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (5. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GNK or CMRE or SBLK or DAC?
On trailing P/E, Danaos Corporation (DAC) is the cheapest at 4.
9x versus Star Bulk Carriers Corp. at 36. 7x. On forward P/E, Danaos Corporation is actually cheaper at 5. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Danaos Corporation wins at 0. 11x versus Star Bulk Carriers Corp. 's 0. 16x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GNK or CMRE or SBLK or DAC?
Over the past 5 years, Costamare Inc.
(CMRE) delivered a total return of +146. 2%, compared to +79. 1% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SBLK returned +977. 3% versus DAC's +225. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GNK or CMRE or SBLK or DAC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Danaos Corporation (DAC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
62β versus Costamare Inc. 's 1. 25β — meaning CMRE is approximately 101% more volatile than DAC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 70% for Costamare Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GNK or CMRE or SBLK or DAC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Danaos Corporation (DAC) is pulling ahead at 2.
8% versus -57. 9% for Costamare Inc. (CMRE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Costamare Inc. grew EPS 17. 2% year-over-year, compared to -105. 7% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, DAC leads at 1. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GNK or CMRE or SBLK or DAC?
Danaos Corporation (DAC) is the more profitable company, earning 47.
4% net margin versus -1. 3% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited — meaning it keeps 47. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CMRE leads at 51. 7% versus 2. 7% for GNK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DAC leads at 60. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GNK or CMRE or SBLK or DAC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Danaos Corporation (DAC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 11x versus Star Bulk Carriers Corp. 's 0. 16x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Danaos Corporation (DAC) trades at 5. 3x forward P/E versus 14. 9x for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited — 9. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SBLK: 8. 2% to $29. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GNK or CMRE or SBLK or DAC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Costamare Inc. (CMRE) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 1. 1% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK).
09Is GNK or CMRE or SBLK or DAC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
(SBLK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 1. 1% yield, +977. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SBLK: +977. 3%, CMRE: +242. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GNK and CMRE and SBLK and DAC?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GNK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CMRE is a small-cap deep-value stock; SBLK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DAC is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.