Marine Shipping
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GNK vs SBLK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Marine Shipping
GNK vs SBLK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping |
| Market Cap | $1.10B | $3.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $114.70B | $1.04B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9.32B | $84M |
| Gross Margin | 62.9% | 33.0% |
| Operating Margin | 0.0% | 13.6% |
| Forward P/E | 14.9x | 8.0x |
| Total Debt | $200M | $1.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $56M | $500M |
GNK vs SBLK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Genco Shipping & Tr… (GNK) | 100 | 534.1 | +434.1% |
| Star Bulk Carriers … (SBLK) | 100 | 526.7 | +426.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GNK vs SBLK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GNK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.00, yield 3.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 22.3%, current ratio 2.34x
- Beta 1.00, yield 3.0%, current ratio 2.34x
SBLK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -17.6%, EPS growth -73.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -10.1%
- 9.8% 10Y total return vs GNK's 401.1%
- -17.6% revenue growth vs GNK's -19.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -17.6% revenue growth vs GNK's -19.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.0x vs 14.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.1% margin vs SBLK's 8.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.73 vs GNK's 1.00 | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, vs SBLK's 1.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +94.4% vs SBLK's +83.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.0% ROA vs SBLK's 2.2%, ROIC 0.7% vs 3.2% |
GNK vs SBLK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GNK vs SBLK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GNK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GNK is the larger business by revenue, generating $114.7B annually — 110.0x SBLK's $1.0B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 8.1% (GNK) to 8.1% (SBLK). On growth, GNK holds the edge at +1604.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $114.7B | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $112M | $311M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9.3B | $84M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $15.2B | $209M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.9% | +33.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.0% | +13.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.1% | +8.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.3% | +20.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1604.6% | -2.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +175.0% | +58.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SBLK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SBLK's 11.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GNK's 14.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $3.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -252.10x | 36.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.93x | 8.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.75x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.38x | 11.87x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.21x | 2.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.22x | 1.26x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 14.73x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GNK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GNK delivers a 4.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $3 for SBLK. GNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SBLK's 0.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SBLK scores 5/9 vs GNK's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.2% | +3.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.0% | +2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.7% | +3.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.9% | +4.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $145M | $572M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $56M | $500M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $200M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.00x | 2.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GNK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GNK five years ago would be worth $19,536 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,911 for SBLK. Over the past 12 months, GNK leads with a +94.4% total return vs SBLK's +83.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GNK at 26.6% vs SBLK's 17.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +39.4% | +40.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +94.4% | +83.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +103.0% | +60.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.4% | +79.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +401.1% | +977.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.6% | +17.1% |
Risk & Volatility
SBLK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SBLK is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GNK's 1.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.09 | $27.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.66 | $14.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.6% | +98.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.0 | 72.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 415K | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
GNK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GNK as "Buy" and SBLK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.2% upside for SBLK (target: $29) vs -18.7% for GNK (target: $21). For income investors, GNK offers the higher dividend yield at 3.00% vs SBLK's 1.11%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.50 | $29.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.0% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.76 | $0.30 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.2% |
GNK leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SBLK leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
GNK vs SBLK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GNK or SBLK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
(SBLK) is the stronger pick with -17. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 1% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK). Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) offers the better valuation at 36. 7x trailing P/E (8. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GNK or SBLK?
On forward P/E, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
is actually cheaper at 8. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GNK or SBLK?
Over the past 5 years, Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK) delivered a total return of +95.
4%, compared to +79. 1% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SBLK returned +977. 3% versus GNK's +401. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GNK or SBLK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
(SBLK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus Genco Shipping & Trading Limited's 1. 00β — meaning GNK is approximately 36% more volatile than SBLK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 44% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GNK or SBLK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
(SBLK) is pulling ahead at -17. 6% versus -19. 1% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Star Bulk Carriers Corp. grew EPS -73. 9% year-over-year, compared to -105. 7% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, SBLK leads at -10. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GNK or SBLK?
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
(SBLK) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 1% net margin versus -1. 3% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited — meaning it keeps 8. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SBLK leads at 13. 5% versus 2. 7% for GNK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SBLK leads at 22. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GNK or SBLK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
(SBLK) trades at 8. 0x forward P/E versus 14. 9x for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited — 6. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SBLK: 8. 2% to $29. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GNK or SBLK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 1. 1% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK).
09Is GNK or SBLK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
(SBLK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 1. 1% yield, +977. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SBLK: +977. 3%, GNK: +401. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GNK and SBLK?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GNK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SBLK is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.