Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GNRC vs POWL vs HUBB vs REZI vs FELE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Security & Protection Services
Industrial - Machinery
GNRC vs POWL vs HUBB vs REZI vs FELE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Security & Protection Services | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $15.65B | $11.14B | $26.21B | $6.04B | $4.41B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.33B | $1.13B | $6.00B | $7.47B | $2.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $189M | $187M | $906M | $-527M | $150M |
| Gross Margin | 38.1% | 30.1% | 35.5% | 29.4% | 35.2% |
| Operating Margin | 7.5% | 19.8% | 20.8% | 8.1% | 12.6% |
| Forward P/E | 30.9x | 55.4x | 25.0x | 13.1x | 21.8x |
| Total Debt | $1.33B | $2M | $2.61B | $3.17B | $280M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $341M | $451M | $483M | $661M | $100M |
GNRC vs POWL vs HUBB vs REZI vs FELE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Generac Holdings In… (GNRC) | 100 | 239.8 | +139.8% |
| Powell Industries, … (POWL) | 100 | 3449.0 | +3349.0% |
| Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) | 100 | 402.8 | +302.8% |
| Resideo Technologie… (REZI) | 100 | 570.4 | +470.4% |
| Franklin Electric C… (FELE) | 100 | 197.0 | +97.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GNRC vs POWL vs HUBB vs REZI vs FELE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GNRC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
POWL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 9.1%, EPS growth 20.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.5%
- 26.5% 10Y total return vs HUBB's 410.7%
- PEG 0.92 vs FELE's 2.50
- PEG 0.92 vs 1.20
Among these 5 stocks, HUBB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
REZI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 10.5% revenue growth vs GNRC's -2.0%
FELE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 32 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 1.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 21.1%, current ratio 2.79x
- Beta 0.92, yield 1.1%, current ratio 2.79x
- Beta 0.92 vs REZI's 2.27, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.5% revenue growth vs GNRC's -2.0% | |
| Value | PEG 0.92 vs 1.20 | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.5% margin vs REZI's -7.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.92 vs REZI's 2.27, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 32-year raise streak, vs POWL's 0.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +425.5% vs FELE's +17.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.9% ROA vs REZI's -6.2%, ROIC 90.6% vs 9.0% |
GNRC vs POWL vs HUBB vs REZI vs FELE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GNRC vs POWL vs HUBB vs REZI vs FELE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
POWL leads in 2 of 6 categories
REZI leads 1 • FELE leads 1 • GNRC leads 0 • HUBB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GNRC and HUBB each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REZI is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.5B annually — 6.6x POWL's $1.1B. POWL is the more profitable business, keeping 16.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to REZI's -7.1%. On growth, GNRC holds the edge at +12.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.3B | $1.1B | $6.0B | $7.5B | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $472M | $232M | $1.5B | $802M | $322M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $189M | $187M | $906M | -$527M | $150M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $419M | $143M | $909M | -$1.3B | $169M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.1% | +30.1% | +35.5% | +29.4% | +35.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.5% | +19.8% | +20.8% | +8.1% | +12.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.4% | +16.5% | +15.1% | -7.1% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | +12.6% | +15.2% | -16.8% | +7.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.4% | +6.5% | +11.1% | +2.0% | +9.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +69.9% | -0.8% | +8.3% | +11.4% | +13.4% |
Valuation Metrics
REZI leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.8x trailing earnings, HUBB trades at a 70% valuation discount to GNRC's 99.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), POWL offers better value at 1.03x vs FELE's 3.53x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $15.7B | $11.1B | $26.2B | $6.0B | $4.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16.6B | $10.7B | $28.3B | $8.5B | $4.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 99.17x | 61.76x | 29.81x | -10.68x | 30.75x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 30.91x | 55.38x | 25.01x | 13.07x | 21.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.03x | 1.43x | — | 3.53x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 34.39x | 47.51x | 20.81x | 10.65x | 13.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.72x | 10.09x | 4.48x | 0.81x | 2.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.99x | 17.43x | 6.85x | 2.06x | 3.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 58.38x | 72.00x | 29.97x | — | 22.81x |
Profitability & Efficiency
POWL leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
POWL delivers a 28.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $-18 for REZI. POWL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to REZI's 1.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HUBB scores 7/9 vs REZI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.2% | +28.6% | +24.4% | -18.1% | +11.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.4% | +16.9% | +11.6% | -6.2% | +7.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.9% | +90.6% | +17.1% | +9.0% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.9% | +37.5% | +20.1% | +9.3% | +18.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.51x | 0.00x | 0.68x | 1.09x | 0.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $992M | -$449M | $2.1B | $2.5B | $181M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $341M | $451M | $483M | $661M | $100M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $2M | $2.6B | $3.2B | $280M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.54x | — | 16.90x | -2.36x | 24.75x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
POWL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in POWL five years ago would be worth $252,824 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,149 for GNRC. Over the past 12 months, POWL leads with a +425.5% total return vs FELE's +17.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors POWL at 161.5% vs FELE's 3.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +89.1% | +160.4% | +6.8% | +14.5% | +3.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +129.9% | +425.5% | +41.5% | +111.6% | +17.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +141.5% | +1689.0% | +87.9% | +145.5% | +10.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.5% | +2428.2% | +159.4% | +33.0% | +20.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +666.1% | +2652.9% | +410.7% | +38.9% | +231.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +34.2% | +161.5% | +23.4% | +34.9% | +3.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GNRC and FELE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FELE is the less volatile stock with a 0.92 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than REZI's 2.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GNRC currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs POWL's 70.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.69x | 1.95x | 1.38x | 2.27x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $269.58 | $434.00 | $565.50 | $45.29 | $111.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $113.96 | $54.75 | $349.40 | $18.88 | $83.42 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.0% | +70.5% | +87.2% | +88.9% | +89.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 77.8 | 83.2 | 41.2 | 61.4 | 54.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 895K | 691K | 546K | 1.1M | 281K |
Analyst Outlook
FELE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GNRC as "Buy", POWL as "Hold", HUBB as "Hold", REZI as "Buy", FELE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 8.5% upside for HUBB (target: $535) vs -30.2% for POWL (target: $214). For income investors, FELE offers the higher dividend yield at 1.11% vs POWL's 0.12%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $271.22 | $213.67 | $535.14 | $40.00 | $100.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 39 | 9 | 17 | 7 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.0% | +0.1% | +1.1% | +0.6% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | 12 | 2 | 32 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.00 | $0.35 | $5.35 | $0.23 | $1.11 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | +0.1% | +0.9% | 0.0% | +3.8% |
POWL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). REZI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
GNRC vs POWL vs HUBB vs REZI vs FELE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GNRC or POWL or HUBB or REZI or FELE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Resideo Technologies, Inc.
(REZI) is the stronger pick with 10. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 0% for Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC). Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) offers the better valuation at 29. 8x trailing P/E (25. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC) a "Buy" — based on 39 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GNRC or POWL or HUBB or REZI or FELE?
On trailing P/E, Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the cheapest at 29.
8x versus Generac Holdings Inc. at 99. 2x. On forward P/E, Resideo Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Powell Industries, Inc. wins at 0. 92x versus Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. 's 2. 50x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GNRC or POWL or HUBB or REZI or FELE?
Over the past 5 years, Powell Industries, Inc.
(POWL) delivered a total return of +24. 3%, compared to -18. 5% for Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: POWL returned +26. 5% versus REZI's +38. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GNRC or POWL or HUBB or REZI or FELE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Franklin Electric Co.
, Inc. (FELE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 92β versus Resideo Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 27β — meaning REZI is approximately 148% more volatile than FELE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 109% for Resideo Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GNRC or POWL or HUBB or REZI or FELE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Resideo Technologies, Inc.
(REZI) is pulling ahead at 10. 5% versus -2. 0% for Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Powell Industries, Inc. grew EPS 20. 9% year-over-year, compared to -718. 0% for Resideo Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, POWL leads at 27. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GNRC or POWL or HUBB or REZI or FELE?
Powell Industries, Inc.
(POWL) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 4% net margin versus -7. 1% for Resideo Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HUBB leads at 20. 8% versus 6. 9% for GNRC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GNRC leads at 38. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GNRC or POWL or HUBB or REZI or FELE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 92x versus Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. 's 2. 50x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Resideo Technologies, Inc. (REZI) trades at 13. 1x forward P/E versus 55. 4x for Powell Industries, Inc. — 42. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HUBB: 8. 5% to $535. 14.
08Which pays a better dividend — GNRC or POWL or HUBB or REZI or FELE?
In this comparison, FELE (1.
1% yield), HUBB (1. 1% yield), REZI (0. 6% yield), POWL (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. GNRC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GNRC or POWL or HUBB or REZI or FELE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Franklin Electric Co.
, Inc. (FELE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 92), 1. 1% yield, +231. 4% 10Y return). Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL) carries a higher beta of 1. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FELE: +231. 4%, POWL: +26. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GNRC and POWL and HUBB and REZI and FELE?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
HUBB, REZI, FELE pay a dividend while GNRC, POWL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.