GNSS
Genasys Inc.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$90M
5Y Perf.-56.6%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
GNSS vs CRWD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CRWD
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
Software - Infrastructure
Market Cap$118.59B
5Y Perf.+433.0%
GNSS vs CRWD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | GNSS | CRWD |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $90M | $118.59B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $51M | $4.81B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-15M | $-183M |
| Gross Margin | 43.2% | 74.9% |
| Operating Margin | -22.1% | -5.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 96.2x |
| Total Debt | $21M | $820M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $5.23B |
GNSS vs CRWD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
GNSS
CRWD
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Genasys Inc. (GNSS) | 100 | 43.4 | -56.6% |
| CrowdStrike Holding… (CRWD) | 100 | 533.0 | +433.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GNSS vs CRWD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CRWD leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. Genasys Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
GNSS
Genasys Inc.
The Income Pick
GNSS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.87
- Rev growth 69.8%, EPS growth 44.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -9.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, current ratio 0.72x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
CRWD
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
CRWD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 7.1% 10Y total return vs GNSS's 11.1%
- -3.8% margin vs GNSS's -29.2%
- +5.6% vs GNSS's +1.0%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | GNSS | 69.8% revenue growth vs CRWD's 21.7% |
| Quality / Margins | CRWD | -3.8% margin vs GNSS's -29.2% |
| Stability / Safety | GNSS | Beta 0.87 vs CRWD's 1.35 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | CRWD | +5.6% vs GNSS's +1.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CRWD | -1.9% ROA vs GNSS's -22.0%, ROIC -193.7% vs -56.7% |
GNSS vs CRWD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2026
GNSS vs CRWD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCRWDLAGGINGGNSS
GNSSGenasys Inc.
0leads
CRWDCrowdStrike Holdings,…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs GNSSMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
CRWD5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CRWD2/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CRWD7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CRWD6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRWD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRWD is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.8B annually — 94.6x GNSS's $51M. CRWD is the more profitable business, keeping -3.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GNSS's -29.2%. On growth, GNSS holds the edge at +145.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | GNSSGenasys Inc. | CRWDCrowdStrike Holdi… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $51M | $4.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$9M | $22M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$15M | -$183M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.2% | +74.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -22.1% | -5.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -29.2% | -3.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.3% | +25.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +145.9% | +23.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +78.0% | +140.5% |
CRWD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
CRWD leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | GNSSGenasys Inc. | CRWDCrowdStrike Holdi… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $90M | $118.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $103M | $114.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.97x | -720.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 96.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 952.11x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.21x | 24.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 41.38x | 27.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 90.51x |
CRWD leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CRWD leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CRWD delivers a -4.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-5 in annual profit, vs $-8 for GNSS. CRWD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GNSS's 9.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CRWD scores 4/9 vs GNSS's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | GNSSGenasys Inc. | CRWDCrowdStrike Holdi… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.2% | -4.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -22.0% | -1.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -56.7% | -193.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -68.2% | -2.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 9.85x | 0.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $13M | -$4.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $5.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $21M | $820M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -31.66x | -6.06x |
CRWD leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CRWD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CRWD five years ago would be worth $25,021 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,345 for GNSS. Over the past 12 months, CRWD leads with a +5.6% total return vs GNSS's +1.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CRWD at 52.3% vs GNSS's -11.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | GNSSGenasys Inc. | CRWDCrowdStrike Holdi… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.7% | +3.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.0% | +5.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.6% | +253.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.6% | +150.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.1% | +707.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.9% | +52.3% |
CRWD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GNSS and CRWD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GNSS is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRWD's 1.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CRWD currently trades 82.6% from its 52-week high vs GNSS's 73.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | GNSSGenasys Inc. | CRWDCrowdStrike Holdi… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 1.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.70 | $566.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.40 | $342.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.7% | +82.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.2 | 65.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 97K | 3.6M |
Evenly matched — GNSS and CRWD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | GNSSGenasys Inc. | CRWDCrowdStrike Holdi… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $528.24 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 65 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
CRWD leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
Best OverallCrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
GNSS vs CRWD: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GNSS or CRWD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Genasys Inc.
(GNSS) is the stronger pick with 69. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 21. 7% for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD). Analysts rate CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) a "Buy" — based on 65 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GNSS or CRWD?
Over the past 5 years, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
(CRWD) delivered a total return of +150. 2%, compared to -66. 6% for Genasys Inc. (GNSS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRWD returned +707. 0% versus GNSS's +11. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GNSS or CRWD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Genasys Inc.
(GNSS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 35β — meaning CRWD is approximately 56% more volatile than GNSS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 10% for Genasys Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — GNSS or CRWD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Genasys Inc.
(GNSS) is pulling ahead at 69. 8% versus 21. 7% for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Genasys Inc. grew EPS 44. 4% year-over-year, compared to -725. 9% for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CRWD leads at 29. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GNSS or CRWD?
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
(CRWD) is the more profitable company, earning -3. 4% net margin versus -44. 4% for Genasys Inc. — meaning it keeps -3. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CRWD leads at -3. 4% versus -41. 2% for GNSS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRWD leads at 74. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — GNSS or CRWD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is GNSS or CRWD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
(CRWD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+707. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CRWD: +707. 0%, GNSS: +11. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between GNSS and CRWD?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(GNSS: 145.9% · CRWD: 23.3%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.