REIT - Diversified
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GOOD vs WELL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
GOOD vs WELL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Healthcare Facilities |
| Market Cap | $616M | $149.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $166M | $11.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $21M | $1.43B |
| Gross Margin | -11.7% | 39.1% |
| Operating Margin | 27.9% | 4.4% |
| Forward P/E | 83.0x | 78.4x |
| Total Debt | $856M | $21.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $5.03B |
GOOD vs WELL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gladstone Commercia… (GOOD) | 100 | 71.0 | -29.0% |
| Welltower Inc. (WELL) | 100 | 420.4 | +320.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GOOD vs WELL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GOOD is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and dividends.
- 12.7% margin vs WELL's 12.3%
- 11.4% yield, vs WELL's 1.3%
WELL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.13, yield 1.3%
- Rev growth 35.8%, EPS growth -11.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.7%
- 223.1% 10Y total return vs GOOD's 51.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs GOOD's 8.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (78.4x vs 83.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.7% margin vs WELL's 12.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.13 vs GOOD's 0.55, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 11.4% yield, vs WELL's 1.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.7% vs GOOD's +0.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.3% ROA vs GOOD's 1.7%, ROIC 0.5% vs 4.4% |
GOOD vs WELL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GOOD vs WELL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 70.2x GOOD's $166M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 12.7% (GOOD) to 12.3% (WELL). On growth, WELL holds the edge at +40.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $166M | $11.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $106M | $2.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $21M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $90M | $2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -11.7% | +39.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.9% | +4.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.7% | +12.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +54.1% | +21.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.8% | +40.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | +22.5% |
Valuation Metrics
GOOD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 31.0x trailing earnings, GOOD trades at a 80% valuation discount to WELL's 153.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GOOD's 12.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WELL's 66.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $616M | $149.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $165.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 31.02x | 153.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 82.97x | 78.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.88x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.36x | 66.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.82x | 13.99x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.76x | 3.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.17x | 52.41x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOD leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOD delivers a 9.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $3 for WELL. WELL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GOOD's 2.50x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WELL scores 7/9 vs GOOD's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.7% | +3.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.4% | +0.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.3% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.50x | 0.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $846M | $16.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $5.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $856M | $21.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.46x | 0.26x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WELL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $30,234 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,026 for GOOD. Over the past 12 months, WELL leads with a +42.7% total return vs GOOD's +0.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WELL at 42.5% vs GOOD's 12.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.6% | +14.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.7% | +42.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +43.8% | +189.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.7% | +202.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +51.0% | +223.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.9% | +42.5% |
Risk & Volatility
WELL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WELL is the less volatile stock with a 0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GOOD's 0.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WELL currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs GOOD's 84.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.55x | 0.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.03 | $219.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.33 | $142.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.6% | +97.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.1 | 60.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 390K | 2.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GOOD and WELL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GOOD as "Buy" and WELL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 6.3% upside for WELL (target: $227) vs 2.2% for GOOD (target: $13). For income investors, GOOD offers the higher dividend yield at 11.35% vs WELL's 1.30%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.00 | $226.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +11.4% | +1.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.44 | $2.76 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | 0.0% |
GOOD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WELL leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
GOOD vs WELL: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GOOD or WELL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger pick with 35. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 0% for Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD). Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) offers the better valuation at 31. 0x trailing P/E (83. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GOOD or WELL?
On trailing P/E, Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is the cheapest at 31.
0x versus Welltower Inc. at 153. 3x. On forward P/E, Welltower Inc. is actually cheaper at 78. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GOOD or WELL?
Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) delivered a total return of +202. 3%, compared to -9. 7% for Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WELL returned +223. 1% versus GOOD's +51. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GOOD or WELL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 13β versus Gladstone Commercial Corporation's 0. 55β — meaning GOOD is approximately 315% more volatile than WELL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Welltower Inc. (WELL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 3% for Gladstone Commercial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GOOD or WELL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is pulling ahead at 35. 8% versus 8. 0% for Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Gladstone Commercial Corporation grew EPS 57. 7% year-over-year, compared to -11. 5% for Welltower Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WELL leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GOOD or WELL?
Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is the more profitable company, earning 12.
0% net margin versus 8. 8% for Welltower Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOD leads at 37. 2% versus 3. 3% for WELL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WELL leads at 39. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GOOD or WELL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) trades at 78. 4x forward P/E versus 83. 0x for Gladstone Commercial Corporation — 4. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WELL: 6. 3% to $226. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — GOOD or WELL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) offers the highest yield at 11. 4%, versus 1. 3% for Welltower Inc. (WELL).
09Is GOOD or WELL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 13), 1. 3% yield, +223. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WELL: +223. 1%, GOOD: +51. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GOOD and WELL?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GOOD is a small-cap income-oriented stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.