GP vs EVGO vs CHPT vs WKHS vs RIVN

For growth investors, EVgo, Inc.

(EVGO) is the stronger pick with 49. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -49. 5% for Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS). Analysts rate EVgo, Inc. (EVGO) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, EVgo, Inc.

(EVGO) delivered a total return of -83. 7%, compared to -99. 8% for Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EVGO returned -79. 9% versus WKHS's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rivian Automotive, Inc.

(RIVN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 57β versus ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 64β — meaning CHPT is approximately 68% more volatile than RIVN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, EVgo, Inc. (EVGO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 13% for ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), EVgo, Inc.

(EVGO) is pulling ahead at 49. 6% versus -49. 5% for Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Workhorse Group Inc. grew EPS 65. 4% year-over-year, compared to 8. 1% for GreenPower Motor Company Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EVGO leads at 91. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

EVgo, Inc.

(EVGO) is the more profitable company, earning -10. 8% net margin versus -1538. 5% for Workhorse Group Inc. — meaning it keeps -10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EVGO leads at -28. 8% versus -1116. 7% for WKHS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CHPT leads at 30. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Rivian Automotive, Inc.

(RIVN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT) carries a higher beta of 2. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RIVN: -85. 9%, CHPT: -96. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: GP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EVGO is a small-cap high-growth stock; CHPT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WKHS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RIVN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.