Regulated Electric
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GPJA vs AEP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Electric
GPJA vs AEP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Electric | Regulated Electric |
| Market Cap | $245M | $71.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16.56B | $22.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4.63B | $3.65B |
| Gross Margin | 85.7% | 40.4% |
| Operating Margin | 50.2% | 23.5% |
| Forward P/E | 0.1x | 20.8x |
| Total Debt | $19.88B | $50.24B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $97M | $268M |
GPJA vs AEP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Georgia Power Compa… (GPJA) | 100 | 85.4 | -14.6% |
| American Electric P… (AEP) | 100 | 154.6 | +54.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GPJA vs AEP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GPJA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 12.0%, EPS growth 77.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.79, Low D/E 83.9%, current ratio 0.72x
- PEG 0.00 vs AEP's 2.43
AEP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.01, yield 2.9%
- 146.9% 10Y total return vs GPJA's 26.1%
- Beta 0.01 vs GPJA's 0.79
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.0% revenue growth vs AEP's 9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.1x vs 20.8x), PEG 0.00 vs 2.43 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.9% margin vs AEP's 16.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs GPJA's 0.79 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs AEP's 2.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.1% vs GPJA's +6.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs AEP's 3.2%, ROIC 12.7% vs 5.1% |
GPJA vs AEP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GPJA vs AEP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GPJA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AEP and GPJA operate at a comparable scale, with $22.2B and $16.6B in trailing revenue. GPJA is the more profitable business, keeping 27.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AEP's 16.5%. On growth, GPJA holds the edge at +125.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16.6B | $22.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $14.1B | $8.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4.6B | $3.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.8B | $840M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +85.7% | +40.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +50.2% | +23.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +27.9% | +16.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.9% | +3.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +125.3% | +6.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -99.1% | +6.7% |
Valuation Metrics
GPJA leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.1x trailing earnings, GPJA trades at a 100% valuation discount to AEP's 19.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GPJA offers better value at 0.00x vs AEP's 2.32x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $245M | $71.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $20.0B | $121.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.06x | 19.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 20.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.00x | 2.32x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.69x | 13.84x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 3.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | 2.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.63x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GPJA leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GPJA delivers a 12.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $11 for AEP. GPJA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.84x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AEP's 1.56x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.1% | +11.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.5% | +3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.7% | +5.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.4% | +5.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.84x | 1.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $19.8B | $50.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $97M | $268M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19.9B | $50.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 2.61x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AEP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AEP five years ago would be worth $17,068 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,791 for GPJA. Over the past 12 months, AEP leads with a +26.1% total return vs GPJA's +6.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AEP at 15.7% vs GPJA's 2.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.4% | +14.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.7% | +26.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.2% | +54.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.9% | +70.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.1% | +146.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.0% | +15.7% |
Risk & Volatility
AEP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AEP is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GPJA's 0.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.79x | 0.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.00 | $139.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.34 | $97.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.6% | +94.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.3 | 46.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 17K | 2.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GPJA and AEP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, GPJA offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs AEP's 2.93%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $136.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 21 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $268.06 | $3.86 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GPJA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). AEP leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
GPJA vs AEP: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GPJA or AEP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Georgia Power Company 5% JR SUB NT 77 (GPJA) is the stronger pick with 12.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 4% for American Electric Power Company, Inc. (AEP). Georgia Power Company 5% JR SUB NT 77 (GPJA) offers the better valuation at 0. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate American Electric Power Company, Inc. (AEP) a "Buy" — based on 35 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GPJA or AEP?
On trailing P/E, Georgia Power Company 5% JR SUB NT 77 (GPJA) is the cheapest at 0.
1x versus American Electric Power Company, Inc. at 19. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GPJA or AEP?
Over the past 5 years, American Electric Power Company, Inc.
(AEP) delivered a total return of +70. 7%, compared to +7. 9% for Georgia Power Company 5% JR SUB NT 77 (GPJA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AEP returned +146. 9% versus GPJA's +26. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GPJA or AEP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Electric Power Company, Inc.
(AEP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus Georgia Power Company 5% JR SUB NT 77's 0. 79β — meaning GPJA is approximately 12211% more volatile than AEP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Georgia Power Company 5% JR SUB NT 77 (GPJA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 84% versus 156% for American Electric Power Company, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GPJA or AEP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Georgia Power Company 5% JR SUB NT 77 (GPJA) is pulling ahead at 12.
0% versus 9. 4% for American Electric Power Company, Inc. (AEP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Georgia Power Company 5% JR SUB NT 77 grew EPS 77. 8% year-over-year, compared to 19. 4% for American Electric Power Company, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GPJA leads at 7. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GPJA or AEP?
Georgia Power Company 5% JR SUB NT 77 (GPJA) is the more profitable company, earning 38.
8% net margin versus 16. 4% for American Electric Power Company, Inc. — meaning it keeps 38. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GPJA leads at 62. 4% versus 24. 3% for AEP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GPJA leads at 54. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — GPJA or AEP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Georgia Power Company 5% JR SUB NT 77 (GPJA) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 2. 9% for American Electric Power Company, Inc. (AEP).
08Is GPJA or AEP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Electric Power Company, Inc.
(AEP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 01), 2. 9% yield, +146. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AEP: +146. 9%, GPJA: +26. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between GPJA and AEP?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GPJA is a small-cap deep-value stock; AEP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.